I think from a broad-based perspective they are all forms of government tyranny. Sort of the opposite of freedom. The end result is hegemonic domination of the general population through authoritarian means.
So, the difference between these three things you're saying are different is how they treat their political prisoners? Why does that matter? How is it inherent in each of the three things that you're saying are different?
An authoritarian government always leads to a fiefdom where a handful of wealthy and powerful families control the land and its populace, where they are the Lords and the populace are the serfs.
And they all lead to the same spot, which is the point.
I think from a broad-based perspective they are all forms of government tyranny. Sort of the opposite of freedom. The end result is hegemonic domination of the general population through authoritarian means.
So, the difference between these three things you're saying are different is how they treat their political prisoners? Why does that matter? How is it inherent in each of the three things that you're saying are different?
Ok
An authoritarian government always leads to a fiefdom where a handful of wealthy and powerful families control the land and its populace, where they are the Lords and the populace are the serfs.
That's why they are the same.