4539
Comments (756)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
GarudaDarkblack 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only half of them were armed. Weapon Free Zones are stupid. He could have walked in there with two machetes and everyone who couldn't find a chance to run away would have been just as helpless. Gun Free Zones force a power imbalance and when someone takes advantage of that imbalance the result is devastating.

2
MAGAMAN4EVA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Half? Only a small number really need to be armed to stop one guy, even that guy.. Not that, that changes the gun free zones are stupid argument.

1
GarudaDarkblack 1 point ago +1 / -0

One or two is the threshold while half or more is the objective.