I midget could roundhouse kick a pregnant mother's belly, and that's murder. The same mother can have someone insert scissors into her to dismember growing baby and vacuum it out of her, and it's pro choice. Can't explain that.
The left's counter argument will be "her body, her choice". They are absolutely convinced that mothers should be allowed to kill their own offspring as long as it's still inside her body.
So, 'her body, her choice', but then if the father wants to keep it, tough shit, he's got no say in the matter, but then if the mother wants to keep it, dad better prepare for a lifetime of having his wages garnished for child support (unless he's black, in which case he's scot free and mom will just soak the taxpayers for WIC, SNAP, welfare, free school lunches and now also breakfasts, etc. etc. etc.). Yep. seems reasonable.
it really is often the other way around. Women rarely choose to get abortions, its the father and families who do the choosing for them. If abortions were not legal, they would not be able to pressure mothers into them. In the rare case that the woman has sufficient agency to get an abortion, yes, if the father says no she can say "well it's my choice and my body" etc. But it's mostly irrelevant and conceals the fact that abortions are not about a woman's choice, but about getting rid of inconvenient children.
I midget could roundhouse kick a pregnant mother's belly, and that's murder. The same mother can have someone insert scissors into her to dismember growing baby and vacuum it out of her, and it's pro choice. Can't explain that.
What if the midget is the abortion doctor and he has scissors in his hands?
Govornor Northam recommends having the baby first, making it and the mother comfortable.
Then he'll call the midget a couple of days later to kill the baby.
Northam probably
Edward, is that you?
What if the midget is named Ditka?
The left's counter argument will be "her body, her choice". They are absolutely convinced that mothers should be allowed to kill their own offspring as long as it's still inside her body.
So, 'her body, her choice', but then if the father wants to keep it, tough shit, he's got no say in the matter, but then if the mother wants to keep it, dad better prepare for a lifetime of having his wages garnished for child support (unless he's black, in which case he's scot free and mom will just soak the taxpayers for WIC, SNAP, welfare, free school lunches and now also breakfasts, etc. etc. etc.). Yep. seems reasonable.
This.
it really is often the other way around. Women rarely choose to get abortions, its the father and families who do the choosing for them. If abortions were not legal, they would not be able to pressure mothers into them. In the rare case that the woman has sufficient agency to get an abortion, yes, if the father says no she can say "well it's my choice and my body" etc. But it's mostly irrelevant and conceals the fact that abortions are not about a woman's choice, but about getting rid of inconvenient children.
If time machines are ever invented, someone should convince the parents of everyone in planned parenthood to abort them to save other babies.
Would love watching their heads explode from that.
And if the woman changes her mind later, is the doctor now a rapist and a murderer?