I guess I’m dumbfounded you can’t run you own hypothetical properly. Why you inserted yourself into this hypothetical I’ll never know. I imagine it’s your own callousness towards life that makes you fantasize so. However that’s irrelevant. You made it personal not me. If you had said person A creates a strange life or death scenario and asks person B to be involved then what should person B do, then I would have said person B has an obligation to use “up to lethal force” (and should prefer that option if a victim is in imminent credible danger) against person A to keep them from committing that violence.
How you jumped from that to me coming through the keyboard o kill you is a leap I won’t understand. It is evidence you cannot develop your own logical arguments properly. Why do you care that you have anecdotal support when you tell another commenter that their sources are invalid because they use that very same thing? It has no bearing on if what you are saying is truth or not.
Why you inserted yourself into this hypothetical I’ll never know.
The whole point of a hypothetical is that it's fiction. Thus it doesn't matter whether I'm in the story or batman. Its 100% irrelevant. Just like continuing to talk to you.
Nice zinger. You argue like a leftist middle schooler that likes Trump for the memes. Would have loved to argue over your beliefs as I believe discourse with all ideas is important. But you never really moved to defend your own or understand mine. Instead you attack/discredit me personally because you perceived a slight. Which is classic leftist debate strategy. I can handle being called an idiot but you never explained why I am. I made it pretty clear I would kill Batman in that scenario too. Why would I be wrong for doing that?
I’ve got one for you. I’m going to kill a 5 year old or a death row inmate. You pick which one. If you don’t I’ll kill both.
I guess I’m dumbfounded you can’t run you own hypothetical properly. Why you inserted yourself into this hypothetical I’ll never know. I imagine it’s your own callousness towards life that makes you fantasize so. However that’s irrelevant. You made it personal not me. If you had said person A creates a strange life or death scenario and asks person B to be involved then what should person B do, then I would have said person B has an obligation to use “up to lethal force” (and should prefer that option if a victim is in imminent credible danger) against person A to keep them from committing that violence.
How you jumped from that to me coming through the keyboard o kill you is a leap I won’t understand. It is evidence you cannot develop your own logical arguments properly. Why do you care that you have anecdotal support when you tell another commenter that their sources are invalid because they use that very same thing? It has no bearing on if what you are saying is truth or not.
The whole point of a hypothetical is that it's fiction. Thus it doesn't matter whether I'm in the story or batman. Its 100% irrelevant. Just like continuing to talk to you.
Nice zinger. You argue like a leftist middle schooler that likes Trump for the memes. Would have loved to argue over your beliefs as I believe discourse with all ideas is important. But you never really moved to defend your own or understand mine. Instead you attack/discredit me personally because you perceived a slight. Which is classic leftist debate strategy. I can handle being called an idiot but you never explained why I am. I made it pretty clear I would kill Batman in that scenario too. Why would I be wrong for doing that?
I’ve got one for you. I’m going to kill a 5 year old or a death row inmate. You pick which one. If you don’t I’ll kill both.