If the guy doesn’t like being called that, why would he announce this nickname to the world and acknowledge he doesn’t like being called this?? He just branded himself...
Am confused, how would him cutting off his penis and being referred to as "Brianne Stelter" change things....ooooh, wait, you're referring to redpilling. Gotcha.
Thats funny but Hannity is still controlled opposition.
Megyn Kelly was hated by the dems too and she still happily provided pr cover for Pedo Elefantis and then jumped ship to NBC only to realize she was just a useful idiot to the left and that she would mever really be a part of their club.
Hannity knows he will never be a part of their club but I bet he still loves their money.
Something about Hannity never felt right to me. He runs cover for Graham and Barr and gives them an outlet to calm us down while they slow walk and cover up for major players.
All of the "tick-tocks", "It's coming" and "Trust Q" bs is simply meant to placate us into not taking action until its too late.
I hope Im wrong but that is where everything seems to be heading(ShadowNet, Sundance)
I am SO SICK of people like you claiming Q is lulling people into inaction and submission. Q followers and researchers are some of the most active, most dedicated people in the entire Lion party. We are always ahead of the curve on calling out the swamp because we spend hours and hours digging into all kinds of information, sharing it with everyone else, and looking for connections.
Just to prove my point, notice how many followers of Q get retweeted by Trump on Twitter. If you see massive redpills going viral on Twitter, there is a very strong chance the people posting them, adding onto them in the replies or interacting with them in general are Q followers. We are everywhere, and we are active.
Unless, if your expectation is that Q followers should start armed uprisings everywhere, then you are no better than the leftists and the media. Do you want a bunch of Q followers in the streets causing chaos? That's the kind of shit the media dreams of!
You are horribly misinformed if you really think the Q group is all about Mueller and Sessions and Mattis and whatnot. The whole point of Q is getting Q followers to do research on topics. If it makes you feel better, just ignore whatever statements you may see from Q and instead focus on the questions Q asks (aka the leads Q gives to Q followers on what to research).
I'm irritated because you are refusing to do proper research into Q, instead of just surface-level observations from what some people may have said, or what some people may have observed from other people. It draws remarkable parallels to people on the left who refuse to consider the idea that orange man isn't bad and will simply turn their shoulder on it.
In case you haven't figured it out, "the plan" that Q speaks of isn't "hey, we've got it under control, so you can just sit back and do nothing". "the plan" is "Hey, we need you to be researching these topics: A, B, C, etc. Go dig into these and share what you find. Get up and go to work." The whole plan behind Q, the whole purpose of Q, is to facilitate and accelerate citizen research, or "collective autism", to bring information to light. It's GETTING people to work, not the OPPOSITE!
Look, I apologize for painting with such broad strokes. I have respect for anyone that spends the time trying to track down the truth. I followed Q for a while at the beginning but the Sessions stuff lost me. I have seen a lot of Q people lately posting things like "just wait til the hammer drops in October" which aggravates me and seems like they think we should all just sit on our hands and see how it plays out. That may not be the case with most of you but that is how those comments come off to me.
Have you been paying close attention to the Durham investigation and Sundance?
Legit asking because it seems like another slowwalk and cover-up but Id like to know what your opinion of it is
Something's fucky about the whole ordeal between the DOJ and Sundance. We know that the DOJ took Sundance's claims seriously given the sudden press conferences that took place, notably with Barr, right after Sundance really started threatening to release his info.
It seems to me that the Durham investigation is intentionally designed to take it slow (probably waiting until after election), I did some very basic looking around into the supposed real investigator that Sundance revealed and am not certain if he is on our side. I feel like the Trump alliance's strategy is to hold off on indictments potentially because it could disrupt their election messaging, cause mass confusion and chaos, or perhaps they're saving it as a last resort/dead mans switch type deal?
I do think the first indictment of the Durham Investication, KC, is very notable (and is a name that has been brought up more than once by Q, interestingly). I don't know much about KC but I will be looking into him more.
Yeah I know about the 11.3 being the 1st marker post from Q+ a couple years ago and how it matches his initials.
I agree about Aldenburg, he gives me a bad feeling, the fact he was involved in Sandy Hook isn't a good sign in my opinion.
The fact that it is all so fractured and compartmentalized to where the investigators are less informed than most pedes is worrying to say the least.
I got the opposite feeling about Clinesmith tho, they gave him a slap on the wrist plea deal and he still doesnt admit guilt. Doesn't sound like he was pressured in the slightest to give anyone up or inform on anyone
The investigation already has the information they need; they don't need to get anything out of Clinesmith. I think the DOJ knew what Sundance knew (so Sundance's intel is legit), and so their sudden push to show us that the Durham investigation isn't a dud or cover by releasing an indictment and promising more of them soon suggests to me that Barr and others know that we would be discouraged to see that Aidenburg is swampy.
Furthermore, if the DOG knows Aidenburg is swamp, but is going with him anyways, then maybe they have tight reins over him and were using his swamp status as a body shield / disguise from the deep state?
According to Q a few days ago, we should see 5 more indictments from the investigation go public in "Set 1" (maybe this first set is stuff before the election?). Q strangely states that these are non-civilian indictments, implying military involvement, maybe military tribunals. For someone trying to run a LARP, it would be extremely bold and strange to directly contradict the known information (in this case, we know KC has been caught in Durham which is a DOJ investigation, not military).
This latest Q post on this topic doesn't tell us anything, but when more stuff comes out of the Durham investigation (which Barr said would happen before the election), maybe this post will be useful to consider.
I like that perspective more than my grim one. Has there been any kind of confirmation of Military cooperation? I know most of the troops are conservative but I always heard the officers were mostly liberal or swamp? Was Mattis ever mentioned?
I appreciate the sourcing but I dont expect you to link or source all this stuff, I just like to get different opinions and I dont know much of the Q stuff from the last couple years, I just catch stuff here and there
Adding onto the whole KC thing, one thing that is extremely interesting to me is this Q drop from 2018 which lays out a series of initials and some sort of map between players in spygate. KC is one of the initials; afaik back then we did not know about Clinesmith at all.
It doesn't feel right because he is and always will be a phony repub. shill. He stuck up for Bush, McCain, any Repub. He isn't only in it for the money; he wants power, too. He's building his image constantly, so he can eventually run for office. A phony wrapped in the American flag.
I cringe whenever he says "Stinky Walmart shoppers" - he enjoys saying that too much and you know that guy has never set foot in a Walmart. He tries to hard to seem like an everyday Joe but he's not one.
lmao. What a fat fuck Stelter is, and that's coming from a fat fuck myself. Could he have instead, maybe, come up with a nickname for Hannity? Something else based on a nursery rhyme? Nah, that would take wit.
😂🤣😂
If the guy doesn’t like being called that, why would he announce this nickname to the world and acknowledge he doesn’t like being called this?? He just branded himself...
Brian Stelter = Humpty Dumpty
Right? Because we’d never start calling him Humpty or anything. Never.
How could you work at the same place as Chris "Fredo" Cuomo and not realize what's going to happen here?
I found the footage
He really does look like Humpty Dumpty
Am confused, how would him cutting off his penis and being referred to as "Brianne Stelter" change things....ooooh, wait, you're referring to redpilling. Gotcha.
"Do you ever feel bad for calling me names?"
I don't think about you at all.
https://i.maga.host/ra5ovnS.png
That may be the most alpha af move ever. Shows you how beta Stelter is to include this in his book to think it makes Hannity look bad.
I wouldn't be surprised if in the next paragraph he went on to talk about how he walked into a corner alone and cried.
Stelter is a model for How a MAN shouldn't look or act!
What a beta super-faggot!
My god!
Tucker calls him the CNN eunuch.
Thats funny but Hannity is still controlled opposition. Megyn Kelly was hated by the dems too and she still happily provided pr cover for Pedo Elefantis and then jumped ship to NBC only to realize she was just a useful idiot to the left and that she would mever really be a part of their club. Hannity knows he will never be a part of their club but I bet he still loves their money. Something about Hannity never felt right to me. He runs cover for Graham and Barr and gives them an outlet to calm us down while they slow walk and cover up for major players. All of the "tick-tocks", "It's coming" and "Trust Q" bs is simply meant to placate us into not taking action until its too late. I hope Im wrong but that is where everything seems to be heading(ShadowNet, Sundance)
Edit: Not advocating violence
I am SO SICK of people like you claiming Q is lulling people into inaction and submission. Q followers and researchers are some of the most active, most dedicated people in the entire Lion party. We are always ahead of the curve on calling out the swamp because we spend hours and hours digging into all kinds of information, sharing it with everyone else, and looking for connections.
Just to prove my point, notice how many followers of Q get retweeted by Trump on Twitter. If you see massive redpills going viral on Twitter, there is a very strong chance the people posting them, adding onto them in the replies or interacting with them in general are Q followers. We are everywhere, and we are active.
Unless, if your expectation is that Q followers should start armed uprisings everywhere, then you are no better than the leftists and the media. Do you want a bunch of Q followers in the streets causing chaos? That's the kind of shit the media dreams of!
You are horribly misinformed if you really think the Q group is all about Mueller and Sessions and Mattis and whatnot. The whole point of Q is getting Q followers to do research on topics. If it makes you feel better, just ignore whatever statements you may see from Q and instead focus on the questions Q asks (aka the leads Q gives to Q followers on what to research).
I'm irritated because you are refusing to do proper research into Q, instead of just surface-level observations from what some people may have said, or what some people may have observed from other people. It draws remarkable parallels to people on the left who refuse to consider the idea that orange man isn't bad and will simply turn their shoulder on it.
In case you haven't figured it out, "the plan" that Q speaks of isn't "hey, we've got it under control, so you can just sit back and do nothing". "the plan" is "Hey, we need you to be researching these topics: A, B, C, etc. Go dig into these and share what you find. Get up and go to work." The whole plan behind Q, the whole purpose of Q, is to facilitate and accelerate citizen research, or "collective autism", to bring information to light. It's GETTING people to work, not the OPPOSITE!
Look, I apologize for painting with such broad strokes. I have respect for anyone that spends the time trying to track down the truth. I followed Q for a while at the beginning but the Sessions stuff lost me. I have seen a lot of Q people lately posting things like "just wait til the hammer drops in October" which aggravates me and seems like they think we should all just sit on our hands and see how it plays out. That may not be the case with most of you but that is how those comments come off to me.
Have you been paying close attention to the Durham investigation and Sundance?
Legit asking because it seems like another slowwalk and cover-up but Id like to know what your opinion of it is
Something's fucky about the whole ordeal between the DOJ and Sundance. We know that the DOJ took Sundance's claims seriously given the sudden press conferences that took place, notably with Barr, right after Sundance really started threatening to release his info.
It seems to me that the Durham investigation is intentionally designed to take it slow (probably waiting until after election), I did some very basic looking around into the supposed real investigator that Sundance revealed and am not certain if he is on our side. I feel like the Trump alliance's strategy is to hold off on indictments potentially because it could disrupt their election messaging, cause mass confusion and chaos, or perhaps they're saving it as a last resort/dead mans switch type deal?
I do think the first indictment of the Durham Investication, KC, is very notable (and is a name that has been brought up more than once by Q, interestingly). I don't know much about KC but I will be looking into him more.
Yeah I know about the 11.3 being the 1st marker post from Q+ a couple years ago and how it matches his initials.
I agree about Aldenburg, he gives me a bad feeling, the fact he was involved in Sandy Hook isn't a good sign in my opinion.
The fact that it is all so fractured and compartmentalized to where the investigators are less informed than most pedes is worrying to say the least.
I got the opposite feeling about Clinesmith tho, they gave him a slap on the wrist plea deal and he still doesnt admit guilt. Doesn't sound like he was pressured in the slightest to give anyone up or inform on anyone
Here's what I suspect:
The investigation already has the information they need; they don't need to get anything out of Clinesmith. I think the DOJ knew what Sundance knew (so Sundance's intel is legit), and so their sudden push to show us that the Durham investigation isn't a dud or cover by releasing an indictment and promising more of them soon suggests to me that Barr and others know that we would be discouraged to see that Aidenburg is swampy.
Furthermore, if the DOG knows Aidenburg is swamp, but is going with him anyways, then maybe they have tight reins over him and were using his swamp status as a body shield / disguise from the deep state?
According to Q a few days ago, we should see 5 more indictments from the investigation go public in "Set 1" (maybe this first set is stuff before the election?). Q strangely states that these are non-civilian indictments, implying military involvement, maybe military tribunals. For someone trying to run a LARP, it would be extremely bold and strange to directly contradict the known information (in this case, we know KC has been caught in Durham which is a DOJ investigation, not military).
https://qmap.pub/read/4621
This latest Q post on this topic doesn't tell us anything, but when more stuff comes out of the Durham investigation (which Barr said would happen before the election), maybe this post will be useful to consider.
I like that perspective more than my grim one. Has there been any kind of confirmation of Military cooperation? I know most of the troops are conservative but I always heard the officers were mostly liberal or swamp? Was Mattis ever mentioned? I appreciate the sourcing but I dont expect you to link or source all this stuff, I just like to get different opinions and I dont know much of the Q stuff from the last couple years, I just catch stuff here and there
[second reply, read other reply first]
Adding onto the whole KC thing, one thing that is extremely interesting to me is this Q drop from 2018 which lays out a series of initials and some sort of map between players in spygate. KC is one of the initials; afaik back then we did not know about Clinesmith at all.
https://qmap.pub/read/1828
It doesn't feel right because he is and always will be a phony repub. shill. He stuck up for Bush, McCain, any Repub. He isn't only in it for the money; he wants power, too. He's building his image constantly, so he can eventually run for office. A phony wrapped in the American flag.
I think the fact that he went to a holiday party hosted by Mediate proves your point
I cringe whenever he says "Stinky Walmart shoppers" - he enjoys saying that too much and you know that guy has never set foot in a Walmart. He tries to hard to seem like an everyday Joe but he's not one.
He does kind of have a Humpty Dumpty look. Stelter is allowed to call people names too but he's not funny enough. That paragraph is funny though
Fuck you stelter, you fat fag.
Nicer than my nickname for him, Gayface.
https://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Turner+Upfront+2016+fQZ36GllbArx.jpg
Just can't believe that's not a gay dude.
I have always just assumed it. I mean look at the creepy fucker.
No one looks at xim and thinks about sex
Pennywise's long lost brother.
Savage
Does he want to be called Humpty Dumpty? Because this is definitely how to get a nickname like that to stick.
Sean is like a 666 mafia double blackbelt in Tik-Tok-do
What the fuck could Humpty even do?
--Mark Dice's steltervoice
His name is Humpty, pronounced with an Umpty
Stelter’s just mad because Sean wasn’t “behind” him with his hands on his shoulders!
hahahahahahahahahahaja
Do you ever feel bad about your name calling?
No! Lol, now get out of the way.
he wants to paint himself as a victim. Poor little beta cuck. His penis is probably super tiny, too.
Lol. Stelter such a bitch
lmao. What a fat fuck Stelter is, and that's coming from a fat fuck myself. Could he have instead, maybe, come up with a nickname for Hannity? Something else based on a nursery rhyme? Nah, that would take wit.
Humpty showing off what he learned in Creative Writing 101.
Let the HUMPTY memes commence!
At least he didn't call you a eunuch.
He's still half a dud... but he pulls in the right direction. 😉