I was thinking a mass shaming campaign followed by making stuff like adultry illegal again. Then going down the line of degeneracy and outlawing or making it so shameful that very few do it.
Are you also in favor of burning heretics at the stake? That's was done forever too.
So no homosexuality between consenting adults?...then using an undefined term like "perversion" again, who gets to define that? The church? Because, you know...it always worked out so well when the church ran countries.
20 years ago we were fucked as a culture because we were promoting be a slut, getting shitfaced etc. After homosexual "marriage" passed we've been on a deep dive into ripping your dick off and calling yourself a girl and now pedophillia. If not adultry homosexuality NEEDS to be the line.
Not the guy that you responded to, but I don't think homosexuals should be allowed to get married. Marriage is a holy union before the eyes of the lord, dictated to be between a man and a woman. The government forcing churches to marry homosexuals that want it was a very bad move.
To start though, I think doing away with all rainbow pride would go a long way. Slippery slope was proven real and it's going to be a bitch to climb back up that slope now, but it's better to get started sooner than later.
Sorry bud, not triggered, and law or not, I can carry his commandants in my heart because the law of god supersedes the law of man.
You sound like you don't know much about Jesus though. He hung out with a lot of those degenerates. As others wanted to stone and abuse them, Jesus protected them, but he also helped them to be better.
We had laws against adultery and homosexuality in this country only 70 years ago. Moral laws don't equate a theocracy or we would have been one most of our Republic's existence.
Those are theocratic laws. In a sense, the Republic has been theocratic. That's part of the reason behind the rebellion that started with women's suffrage, and the 60's flower power.
Ah yes the "rebellion" of women's suffrage. Thing about the way voting worked backed then only land and business owners, taxpayers and the enlisted had the right to vote. There was nothing stopping a women from voting.
I was thinking a mass shaming campaign followed by making stuff like adultry illegal again. Then going down the line of degeneracy and outlawing or making it so shameful that very few do it.
Jesus warned us all about this 2000 years ago. Turns out it was pretty good advice.
Who gets to define "degenerate"?
Adultery, homosexuality, pedophilia, perversion. The typical shit that's been called degenerate since forever.
Are you also in favor of burning heretics at the stake? That's was done forever too.
So no homosexuality between consenting adults?...then using an undefined term like "perversion" again, who gets to define that? The church? Because, you know...it always worked out so well when the church ran countries.
20 years ago we were fucked as a culture because we were promoting be a slut, getting shitfaced etc. After homosexual "marriage" passed we've been on a deep dive into ripping your dick off and calling yourself a girl and now pedophillia. If not adultry homosexuality NEEDS to be the line.
Not the guy that you responded to, but I don't think homosexuals should be allowed to get married. Marriage is a holy union before the eyes of the lord, dictated to be between a man and a woman. The government forcing churches to marry homosexuals that want it was a very bad move.
To start though, I think doing away with all rainbow pride would go a long way. Slippery slope was proven real and it's going to be a bitch to climb back up that slope now, but it's better to get started sooner than later.
I'd say that Jesus defined it pretty well.
Well I'm about to trigger the fuck out of you.
You don't get to make law based on a bronze age mythological figure any more than anyone else does.
You don't get to just declare your deity real and make public policy based on it and no one else does.
Sorry bud, not triggered, and law or not, I can carry his commandants in my heart because the law of god supersedes the law of man.
You sound like you don't know much about Jesus though. He hung out with a lot of those degenerates. As others wanted to stone and abuse them, Jesus protected them, but he also helped them to be better.
So a theocracy. Islam maybe?
We had laws against adultery and homosexuality in this country only 70 years ago. Moral laws don't equate a theocracy or we would have been one most of our Republic's existence.
Those are theocratic laws. In a sense, the Republic has been theocratic. That's part of the reason behind the rebellion that started with women's suffrage, and the 60's flower power.
Ah yes the "rebellion" of women's suffrage. Thing about the way voting worked backed then only land and business owners, taxpayers and the enlisted had the right to vote. There was nothing stopping a women from voting.