5189
Comments (381)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
EntilZha 2 points ago +9 / -7

Who gets to define "degenerate"?

13
GoldenEagle1776 13 points ago +24 / -11

Adultery, homosexuality, pedophilia, perversion. The typical shit that's been called degenerate since forever.

-12
EntilZha -12 points ago +7 / -19

Are you also in favor of burning heretics at the stake? That's was done forever too.

So no homosexuality between consenting adults?...then using an undefined term like "perversion" again, who gets to define that? The church? Because, you know...it always worked out so well when the church ran countries.

4
GoldenEagle1776 4 points ago +5 / -1

20 years ago we were fucked as a culture because we were promoting be a slut, getting shitfaced etc. After homosexual "marriage" passed we've been on a deep dive into ripping your dick off and calling yourself a girl and now pedophillia. If not adultry homosexuality NEEDS to be the line.

0
EntilZha 0 points ago +4 / -4

"The line" needs to be consenting adults and "in private", nothing else. There is no logical reason people shouldn't be able to indulge their kinks in private as long as they aren't throwing it in your face or hurting anyone. I'm also fine with gay marriage, that's not really "throwing it in your face".

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not the guy that you responded to, but I don't think homosexuals should be allowed to get married. Marriage is a holy union before the eyes of the lord, dictated to be between a man and a woman. The government forcing churches to marry homosexuals that want it was a very bad move.

To start though, I think doing away with all rainbow pride would go a long way. Slippery slope was proven real and it's going to be a bitch to climb back up that slope now, but it's better to get started sooner than later.

0
EntilZha 0 points ago +1 / -1

Too bad there are real legalities tied up in marriage, like taxes and inheritance, and a multitude of other things. It's not just a religious thing.

4
America1stAndOnly 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd say that Jesus defined it pretty well.

-3
EntilZha -3 points ago +1 / -4

Well I'm about to trigger the fuck out of you.

You don't get to make law based on a bronze age mythological figure any more than anyone else does.

You don't get to just declare your deity real and make public policy based on it and no one else does.

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry bud, not triggered, and law or not, I can carry his commandants in my heart because the law of god supersedes the law of man.

You sound like you don't know much about Jesus though. He hung out with a lot of those degenerates. As others wanted to stone and abuse them, Jesus protected them, but he also helped them to be better.

-2
EntilZha -2 points ago +1 / -3

blah blah blah...god botherers are just as annoying as SJWs.

Can't support their arguments with facts so just say "wizard did it".

Not wasting more time on you.