Are you also in favor of burning heretics at the stake? That's was done forever too.
So no homosexuality between consenting adults?...then using an undefined term like "perversion" again, who gets to define that? The church? Because, you know...it always worked out so well when the church ran countries.
20 years ago we were fucked as a culture because we were promoting be a slut, getting shitfaced etc. After homosexual "marriage" passed we've been on a deep dive into ripping your dick off and calling yourself a girl and now pedophillia. If not adultry homosexuality NEEDS to be the line.
"The line" needs to be consenting adults and "in private", nothing else. There is no logical reason people shouldn't be able to indulge their kinks in private as long as they aren't throwing it in your face or hurting anyone. I'm also fine with gay marriage, that's not really "throwing it in your face".
The live and let live attitude brought us here. Now every sin and vice is not only accepted but promoted. I do care what my neighbor is doing in private, I do care what people believe is "acceptable". Also marriage is a religious ceremony between a man and a woman, homos can get bent.
Not the guy that you responded to, but I don't think homosexuals should be allowed to get married. Marriage is a holy union before the eyes of the lord, dictated to be between a man and a woman. The government forcing churches to marry homosexuals that want it was a very bad move.
To start though, I think doing away with all rainbow pride would go a long way. Slippery slope was proven real and it's going to be a bitch to climb back up that slope now, but it's better to get started sooner than later.
Yeah, it's not, and that's kind of the problem. What was once meant to be a deeply personal thing is now a box to be checked on a bunch of government forms.
Adultery, homosexuality, pedophilia, perversion. The typical shit that's been called degenerate since forever.
Are you also in favor of burning heretics at the stake? That's was done forever too.
So no homosexuality between consenting adults?...then using an undefined term like "perversion" again, who gets to define that? The church? Because, you know...it always worked out so well when the church ran countries.
20 years ago we were fucked as a culture because we were promoting be a slut, getting shitfaced etc. After homosexual "marriage" passed we've been on a deep dive into ripping your dick off and calling yourself a girl and now pedophillia. If not adultry homosexuality NEEDS to be the line.
"The line" needs to be consenting adults and "in private", nothing else. There is no logical reason people shouldn't be able to indulge their kinks in private as long as they aren't throwing it in your face or hurting anyone. I'm also fine with gay marriage, that's not really "throwing it in your face".
The live and let live attitude brought us here. Now every sin and vice is not only accepted but promoted. I do care what my neighbor is doing in private, I do care what people believe is "acceptable". Also marriage is a religious ceremony between a man and a woman, homos can get bent.
Not the guy that you responded to, but I don't think homosexuals should be allowed to get married. Marriage is a holy union before the eyes of the lord, dictated to be between a man and a woman. The government forcing churches to marry homosexuals that want it was a very bad move.
To start though, I think doing away with all rainbow pride would go a long way. Slippery slope was proven real and it's going to be a bitch to climb back up that slope now, but it's better to get started sooner than later.
Too bad there are real legalities tied up in marriage, like taxes and inheritance, and a multitude of other things. It's not just a religious thing.
Yeah, it's not, and that's kind of the problem. What was once meant to be a deeply personal thing is now a box to be checked on a bunch of government forms.