Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
You can start saying no at the Blue part. That's what I do. This is like arguing civil rights led to BLM. CRA is still legit. BLM is abusive. Anyway Trump approves the marriage part & the Cuties movie is for straight pedo freaks like Teigen.
I have a problem with them using the term “‘marriage.” That’s something that has religious significance; civil unions are basically the same thing if they still want the tax benefits
The gay political movement was a product of the AIDS “epidemic”. It was a push to enable guys to get their partner on their employers health insurance to cover their AIDS medicines and treatment. The myth of heterosexual spread through vaginal intercourse was necessary to scare normies into demanding government funding of medical research. That’s how Fauci got his start. Politicizing viruses for power and money is nothing new.
As for the lady gays; “look up lesbian bed death”
They lose the spark once the taboo is gone. It’s common.
It’s sad, but true. Familiarity breeds contempt.
I would have no problem with the federal government banning gay marriage and making that the extent of their legislation regarding marriage in general.
That has always been my argument. Marriage is a religious institution. As long as they're afforded the same rights by the state its up to he church to decide whether or not to let them get "married". Had many homos freak out on me because they can't understand the point of their frustration, at the time, rested with the church.
I understand where people like you are coming from, as my parents are the same. They're fine with gay people having the same rights as a straight married couple, but they just want them to use a different word.
I personally don't care what word they use. It's just a word, no one owns it. There are more important things to deal with, like getting rid of the pedos.
Gays sabotaged themselves when they appended "T" to LGB. Freedom to love whomever you love, and fuck whomever you fuck in the fashion that you both can consent to is quintessential in a free society. Nobody has the right to police what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. One is free to judge it disgusting, objectionable, immoral even, but there cannot be repercussions for it aside from personal disassociation. I would go as far as to support workplace protections for homosexuals - you cannot fire someone for a capricious reason that stems from an intensely private activity any more than you can walk into someone's bedroom and tell them to stop doing what they are doing.
But adding traps to the movement endorsed explicit insanity. Men are not women and women are not men. No amount of surgery or hormones changes that. If you say otherwise, you accept insanity. And once you do, all bets are off. Because in the insane world, no rules exist and nothing is off limits.
Backlash is inevitable, and it will be violent. Pedophilia will not fly in the mainstream, because every child has a parent, and with some exceptions, at some point the animal instincts to protect your offspring WILL kick in. And once the backlash starts, it will sweep away all the gains that homosexuals have made and then some.
Because they allowed the insane to hijack their movement.
There's a bit of a chicken and the egg here, as far as the question whether NAMBLA grew out of the gay movement or gay movement grew out of NAMBLA. Though I concede your point that the problem of "liking 'em young" is far more prevalent in the gay male community and is not given anywhere nearly enough opposition - which undermines the cause of the movement and reinforces stereotypes that gay men try to defeat.
Still, restricting the freedoms of those who don't do anything wrong because of the actions of those who abuse the same freedoms is unacceptable in a free society. The same principle could be applied to a great many things outside of sexual preference and before you know it, you live under the rule of the moral busybodies again.
For THOUSAND AND THOUSANDS OF YEARS, we devout Christians (and others) have lived very peaceably alongside homosexuals. We knew that some of us were homosexuals, and we had suspicions about particular individuals, but we knew a few fundamental facts.
As long as they're not bragging about it, we don't care.
It really doesn't matter as long as they get married and have kids.
We only had a problem with people who were openly homosexual, who were flagrant about it.
If you look at, for instance, God's law on how to handle adultery, you need two witnesses. That means the man needs to piss off both his wife and his mistress. If he can keep one or both of them happy, no witnesses means no punishment. So he just has to do it outside of the public eye, and he has to keep his wife and mistress happy.
This is why illegitimate children were often adopted as children. It keeps the mistress happy and it keeps the wife happy.
Nah. That's mixing secular and religious morality (or secular and spiritual if you will). Nothing good ever comes of it.
On the religious side of things I fully support any church's or religion steadfast refusal to marry gays or even admit gays, for whatever reason they choose. Freedom of religion is also essential.
On the secular side of things, I'd be tempted to say that government does not belong in the business of marriage altogether, but that is naive at best. A marriage is a codified legal construct that constitutes a bond and a contract, and there are legal obligations and remedies within its framework. A lot of it has to do with property and the married parties' mutual conduct, and only a portion has to do with raising of children. Nothing stipulates the necessity of children, however, for the marriage to exist. And to get the government out of marriage, the entire legal concept would need to be unwound first, and ain't nobody got time for that.
And given the above, there is no reason why two consenting adults of the same gender cannot enter into the same legal contract that two consenting adults of opposite genders can. Everyone is equal under the law. Prohibiting two gays from entering a legal contract with one another simply because they are gay is capricious, unnecessarily biased and therefore unacceptable.
Also need one on Polygamy. The polygamist FLDS Mormon pedos and ironically many Muslims were rooting for Obergefell v. Hodges because they knew every argument used to justify gay marriage could be extrapolated to apply to polygamy too.
If you mean as a country, we fucked up at the civil war and should have just let the south secede. Would have stopped the government from gaining to much power. If you mean culturally then we fucked up during the early 20th century. All the degeneracy Hollywood was pushing started around that time and only got worse until the shit started reaching critical mass in the 60's.
Trust me when I say your ancestors did a great service to America by saving the South from itself.
An independent South would have been disastrous for both the North and South.
The south at the time was dominated by the ultra large plantation owning elites who basically controlled the entire political establishment. This would have only gotten worse overtime and this would have created a HUGE wealth gap between the Uber rich and the poor.
These conditions would have made it ripe for a socialist revolution, whether it be in the form of communism or fascism is irrelevant. The south would have turned into a socialist dictatorship eventually. Under fascism we allow for Nazi influence to come to America, and under communism we would have opened up America to Soviet influence. Either option is a disaster.
Slavery wasn't even the reason for the war. Tarrifs and taxes on the south was, slavery only became a "reason" once the British wanted to get involved who already outlawed it.
Let's not kid ourselves. Once you defy God's law on marriage and sexual relations, you're going to start raping kids and burning them up on the idol of Moloch. There is a slippery slope, and it starts way at the top.
based and spot on. God's law is supreme, and sex and marriage are divinely instituted. The issues started building up when the natural family started to break down.
so many "good" (bad) things to include that there wouldn't ever be enough space 🤡
Imagine the most fucked up shit, if you can't think of anything try to picture what Lovecraft says about the rituals in his writings. Then multiply that by a 1000 and square it.
It’s all because people defended homosexuality because “it’s not their choice”. Regardless of anyone’s feelings on homosexuality (I personally think it’s the least troublesome part of the LGBT) it’s pretty obvious that it would be used to defend pedophilia.
I can't believe four or five years ago I told my mom not to worry about the trans kids thing, that it was only a fringe minority that everyone was against.
My bet is on them legalizing prostitution next. There's a shitton of camgirls and both NY and VT have pushed bills. Commala Harris has proposed it as well.
Let's go the other way and say no one can marry until the age of contract, or specifically 18. I'll trade smoking and drinking at 16 for that.
I'll also consider the right to vote at graduating high school, becoming a property owner, becoming a trade worker, taking BS college classes in high school, owning a business, or emancipation.
You can start saying no at the Blue part. That's what I do. This is like arguing civil rights led to BLM. CRA is still legit. BLM is abusive. Anyway Trump approves the marriage part & the Cuties movie is for straight pedo freaks like Teigen.
I have a problem with them using the term “‘marriage.” That’s something that has religious significance; civil unions are basically the same thing if they still want the tax benefits
Fucking Rome.
All by design.
Satyricon. Read it.
Until the state subverts the family unit with its own welfare system. (Hint: this already happens)
Was that after their second date?
The gay political movement was a product of the AIDS “epidemic”. It was a push to enable guys to get their partner on their employers health insurance to cover their AIDS medicines and treatment. The myth of heterosexual spread through vaginal intercourse was necessary to scare normies into demanding government funding of medical research. That’s how Fauci got his start. Politicizing viruses for power and money is nothing new.
As for the lady gays; “look up lesbian bed death”
They lose the spark once the taboo is gone. It’s common. It’s sad, but true. Familiarity breeds contempt.
I read this somewhere: A huge Majority of bisexual woman usually end up with men.
I agree, you make fair points.
I would have no problem with the federal government banning gay marriage and making that the extent of their legislation regarding marriage in general.
The only thing the government should be interested in is civil unions for ownership of property, survivorship, and tax returns.
Any two citizens should be able to create a civil union for these reasons and that should be it.
If you want to get married, go talk to your church, that's not any of the government's business.
This would solve all the issues, but of course a solution was never the goal.
That has always been my argument. Marriage is a religious institution. As long as they're afforded the same rights by the state its up to he church to decide whether or not to let them get "married". Had many homos freak out on me because they can't understand the point of their frustration, at the time, rested with the church.
Heretics, especially homos can get bent. Our foolish tolerance for them lead us here.
I understand where people like you are coming from, as my parents are the same. They're fine with gay people having the same rights as a straight married couple, but they just want them to use a different word.
I personally don't care what word they use. It's just a word, no one owns it. There are more important things to deal with, like getting rid of the pedos.
They...are the pedos...
They also aren't particularly interested in mentioning this homosexual male HIV rate for some odd reason 🤔🤔🤔🤔
A frighteningly large percentage of gay men are both pedophiles and victims of pedophiles
The overlap isn't coincidence.
It's the insurance companies that fought it. The legal term "spouse" gives coverage benefits.
You start saying no before the list even starts. We got here because of "acceptance". Never again.
exactly
This is a one way trip, and things are already rolling. Buckle up 🤡
I agree
Thank you.
You didn't invent marriage.
God did.
You can't redefine it.
You are either going to follow God's law or you are not.
If you choose not to, don't be surprised to wake up surrounded by demons.
Amen brother. Nobody believed Noah until the waves swept them away.
We could use a great flood right about now
Degenerate, societies never functioned properly with gay marriages, wake the fuck up.
Gays sabotaged themselves when they appended "T" to LGB. Freedom to love whomever you love, and fuck whomever you fuck in the fashion that you both can consent to is quintessential in a free society. Nobody has the right to police what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. One is free to judge it disgusting, objectionable, immoral even, but there cannot be repercussions for it aside from personal disassociation. I would go as far as to support workplace protections for homosexuals - you cannot fire someone for a capricious reason that stems from an intensely private activity any more than you can walk into someone's bedroom and tell them to stop doing what they are doing.
But adding traps to the movement endorsed explicit insanity. Men are not women and women are not men. No amount of surgery or hormones changes that. If you say otherwise, you accept insanity. And once you do, all bets are off. Because in the insane world, no rules exist and nothing is off limits.
Backlash is inevitable, and it will be violent. Pedophilia will not fly in the mainstream, because every child has a parent, and with some exceptions, at some point the animal instincts to protect your offspring WILL kick in. And once the backlash starts, it will sweep away all the gains that homosexuals have made and then some.
Because they allowed the insane to hijack their movement.
It's nuts that even studying gay conversion therapy is illegal, but sex change surgery gets public funding. That's completely backwards.
I have never saved a comment before. Until now. Well said.
The gay movement started when NAMBLA figured out they would never get traction.
NAMBLA = North America Man-Boy Love Association.
The founders of the gay movement in the US were all pedophiles.
If you assume a homosexual male is a pedophile, you'll be right more often than not.
Most child rapes are not of young girls. And it's not women raping the boys.
There's a bit of a chicken and the egg here, as far as the question whether NAMBLA grew out of the gay movement or gay movement grew out of NAMBLA. Though I concede your point that the problem of "liking 'em young" is far more prevalent in the gay male community and is not given anywhere nearly enough opposition - which undermines the cause of the movement and reinforces stereotypes that gay men try to defeat.
Still, restricting the freedoms of those who don't do anything wrong because of the actions of those who abuse the same freedoms is unacceptable in a free society. The same principle could be applied to a great many things outside of sexual preference and before you know it, you live under the rule of the moral busybodies again.
For THOUSAND AND THOUSANDS OF YEARS, we devout Christians (and others) have lived very peaceably alongside homosexuals. We knew that some of us were homosexuals, and we had suspicions about particular individuals, but we knew a few fundamental facts.
We only had a problem with people who were openly homosexual, who were flagrant about it.
If you look at, for instance, God's law on how to handle adultery, you need two witnesses. That means the man needs to piss off both his wife and his mistress. If he can keep one or both of them happy, no witnesses means no punishment. So he just has to do it outside of the public eye, and he has to keep his wife and mistress happy.
This is why illegitimate children were often adopted as children. It keeps the mistress happy and it keeps the wife happy.
Nah. That's mixing secular and religious morality (or secular and spiritual if you will). Nothing good ever comes of it.
On the religious side of things I fully support any church's or religion steadfast refusal to marry gays or even admit gays, for whatever reason they choose. Freedom of religion is also essential.
On the secular side of things, I'd be tempted to say that government does not belong in the business of marriage altogether, but that is naive at best. A marriage is a codified legal construct that constitutes a bond and a contract, and there are legal obligations and remedies within its framework. A lot of it has to do with property and the married parties' mutual conduct, and only a portion has to do with raising of children. Nothing stipulates the necessity of children, however, for the marriage to exist. And to get the government out of marriage, the entire legal concept would need to be unwound first, and ain't nobody got time for that.
And given the above, there is no reason why two consenting adults of the same gender cannot enter into the same legal contract that two consenting adults of opposite genders can. Everyone is equal under the law. Prohibiting two gays from entering a legal contract with one another simply because they are gay is capricious, unnecessarily biased and therefore unacceptable.
You are placing too much weight on the word "marriage" outside of religious context.
The gays hijacked their own movement when they started parading in the streets
Take your jizz off the streets and keep'em in the sheets.
Imo, those are words every self-respecting homosexual should live by.
Heh, that's when the demons actually spawn.
Revelations was a playbook, apparently.
Christ, guess thats whats next.
https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/the-sexual-decadence-of-weimar-germany/
Fuck, I thought pulp novels from the time were to risque but apparently Weimar made the slutty jungle princess seem like an amish girl in comparison.
All of this is for the Dem elite to be able to fuck kids. Change my mind.
They also want to eat aborted fetuses
Yup everything on their sick checklist is happening behind closed doors already. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
They've known 'the big secret' would be exposed eventually, and they've tried to normalize it before that time.
Sure.
This has nothing to do with raping kids.
It has everything to do with setting oneself in opposition to God.
Satan LOVES to take advantage of his minions.
They are being controlled by demonic forces, and they don't even realize it.
Satan wants to suck their souls down to hell.
Did I succeed in changing your mind?
No, because they are still going to be banging kids in your theory. You just go a bit deeper.
They are satanic though. Nothing is more evil then destroying the innocence of a child.
Denying the Holy Ghost is #1 evil.
Murder is right after that.
Sexual sins after that.
So yes, there is a lot worse than raping children, sadly.
Raped children would disagree with you.
You have your opinions and I have mine. 🇺🇸
you forgot WAX MY BALLS, BIGOT
lol, yeah... will keep that in mind on the future edition we all know will be necessary. honk honk
Also need one on Polygamy. The polygamist FLDS Mormon pedos and ironically many Muslims were rooting for Obergefell v. Hodges because they knew every argument used to justify gay marriage could be extrapolated to apply to polygamy too.
https://law.emory.edu/elj/content/volume-64/issue-6/articles-and-essays/three-crowd-constitutional-right-plural-marriage.html
This is why liberals insist "slippery slope is a myth". Because it's obvious where this is going, and any sane person would stop and turn back.
Porn is a slippery slope.
Sex before marriage started this. Homo acceptance only accelerated our fall.
Where did we go wrong? The 60s?
the sexual revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
If you mean as a country, we fucked up at the civil war and should have just let the south secede. Would have stopped the government from gaining to much power. If you mean culturally then we fucked up during the early 20th century. All the degeneracy Hollywood was pushing started around that time and only got worse until the shit started reaching critical mass in the 60's.
No, slavery was bad and needed to end. And I say this as a southerner.
I am glad the south lost.
I wish slavery was never brought to America because it has brought nothing but trouble, but I can’t change the past.
Every other region in the Americas ended slavery without violence except for the United States and Haiti
Lincoln’s handling of the civil war was nothing short of disastrous
That doesn’t mean the Confederates were good boys who dindu nuffin
But as a Northerner it’s hard to see how letting the South secede wouldn’t have made life better for me and my family in the long run
My ancestors enjoyed no benefit from “winning” the civil war
Trust me when I say your ancestors did a great service to America by saving the South from itself.
An independent South would have been disastrous for both the North and South.
The south at the time was dominated by the ultra large plantation owning elites who basically controlled the entire political establishment. This would have only gotten worse overtime and this would have created a HUGE wealth gap between the Uber rich and the poor.
These conditions would have made it ripe for a socialist revolution, whether it be in the form of communism or fascism is irrelevant. The south would have turned into a socialist dictatorship eventually. Under fascism we allow for Nazi influence to come to America, and under communism we would have opened up America to Soviet influence. Either option is a disaster.
Slavery wasn't even the reason for the war. Tarrifs and taxes on the south was, slavery only became a "reason" once the British wanted to get involved who already outlawed it.
Every CSA State article of secession names slavery as why they left the USA.
The North attacked (and started the war) for many reasons, and you are correct, slavery was not one of them.
So, in a sense, you are correct. But the CSA would not have happened except for slavery.
Should've completely gone through with the Liberia plan.
The south shall rise again!
It started with:
Let's not kid ourselves. Once you defy God's law on marriage and sexual relations, you're going to start raping kids and burning them up on the idol of Moloch. There is a slippery slope, and it starts way at the top.
based and spot on. God's law is supreme, and sex and marriage are divinely instituted. The issues started building up when the natural family started to break down.
so many "good" (bad) things to include that there wouldn't ever be enough space 🤡
The fact that “MAP” minor attracted person is a fucking label now is all you need to know.
Egyptian Royalty was based on the idea that only children of the king can marry children of the king.
So it won't be the first time.
Look at Japan for where we're heading. Unlike what libs say when they make fun of the south Japan has an actual incest problem.
Charles II of Spain Intensifies
6 ft under is my preferred orientation for kid fuckers.
Nah, let their body rot. No point to waste time digging a grave for those scum.
That's the best part, they dig their own grave!
They've taken our silence and restraint as weakness.
thanks! spread it as much as you can.
Fantastic work whoever made this
thanks, had inspiration from previous memes though ;)
Waiting for the Cenk Uygur “Say yes to horsepower!” Campaign for bestiality.
Doesn't the "month" one come before the "marriage" one?
perhaps, though in my opinion pride month really entered popular culture when gay marriage became legal and safe for corporations to exploit
I'm scared to ask, yet part of my brain still wants to know...
What exactly comes after the necrophilia "acceptance"?
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2016/12/07/tom-ford-every-man-penetrated-help-understand-women/
basically state sponsored rape
and you really really don't want to know what comes after that
Masturbating with a male goose and cutting it's throat at the right moment?
Imagine the most fucked up shit, if you can't think of anything try to picture what Lovecraft says about the rituals in his writings. Then multiply that by a 1000 and square it.
Worse: https://www.conservapedia.com/Tony_Podesta
cannibalism
....What?
HE HAS A 4 YEAR OLD SON
Have you studied history?
You should study history.
The most unsettling part of this meme is that there’s more over to the left that we can’t even imagine yet.
It’s all because people defended homosexuality because “it’s not their choice”. Regardless of anyone’s feelings on homosexuality (I personally think it’s the least troublesome part of the LGBT) it’s pretty obvious that it would be used to defend pedophilia.
All the scientists in the world said "IT'S GENETIC!"
Turns out there is no science behind that.
But it tells you what it means to be a scientist in the modern era.
BTW, if you don't want to be gay, don't have gay sex. That's all it takes.
The gay gene was one of the stupidest things I had heard of. Thanks for reminding me about it lol.
This ride reaches the end and maybe it's time to reach for a weapon because them taking your kids right out of your home will be the final step.
We're getting close folks. Should've stopped at the blue...
My god, this just saved a terribly slow meme day
could we please go back to....lets say green? is that too much to ask?
No, let's head back before yellow. That's where they belong and should stay for-fucking-ever.
Necrophiliacs have feelings too!!! This right here is utter clown world shit
I can't believe four or five years ago I told my mom not to worry about the trans kids thing, that it was only a fringe minority that everyone was against.
I draw the line after the green.
Just out of frame on the margin of the right: eating aborted fetuses
Ok so what did they do to embrace pedophilia THIS TIME?
My bet is on them legalizing prostitution next. There's a shitton of camgirls and both NY and VT have pushed bills. Commala Harris has proposed it as well.
hahaha a valiant pede made a meme of yesterday’s hot topic, well done 👍
Let's go the other way and say no one can marry until the age of contract, or specifically 18. I'll trade smoking and drinking at 16 for that.
I'll also consider the right to vote at graduating high school, becoming a property owner, becoming a trade worker, taking BS college classes in high school, owning a business, or emancipation.
Wood chipper goes brrrrrrr...
Really good job on the infographic! SO GLAD our great prez is not a child diddler.
Honkler knows where all the honks are buried. Honk.
"We fucking told you so!" - Orthodox religious people
The orange one is incorrect. It's actually 4 year olds.
6 was bad, 4 is worse... 0_o
I'm honestly surprised they didn't push for incest first.
May it end up with Malaysia Airlines Flight 370.
LOL the last one
Necrophiliacs have feelings too
Yow
Flight lands in California
I've been saying no since the blue one.
100%
Slippery slope, just how they like it
Well made beautiful gif.
Whatever is beyond necros scare me.
Please don't drag me into a group of grifters looking to justify their own existence so they can keep getting money.
Thanks.