2844
Comments (174)
sorted by:
165
deleted 165 points ago +165 / -0
75
RedDuck 75 points ago +75 / -0

The psychology involved here is fascinating. They know that most of their readers are not ready to make the leap to pedophilia yet. They're still in the process of making adult attraction to children socially acceptable so long as it is not acted upon. At the same time they want to begin the conditioning which will get the NPCs to accept the idea that some children want to be sexually active with adults. Shows like this and that other one with the cross-dressing child who strips for gays are the important steps in this direction.

So they don't want the readership to denounce the show, they want the readership to accept the show as avant-garde, but something that should be allowed. How do they do that when it is so blatantly sexualizing children?

You take out your latest right-wing Boogeyman and you say they have a problem with this show. And of course the readership doesn't want to be associated with anything right wing. They've been well trained to take pride in their opposition to right-wingers.

Still this show is a bit much, it could be a threat to the conditioning of the readers if they begin to think to themselves, "wait a minute maybe these crazy right winners are right. So in order to assuage his conscience, the reader is assured that there is a larger movement against "trafficking" which is perfectly okay for him to accept and which is embraced by their thought leaders as well, so there's no larger conspiracy towards pedophilia at work here.

Nevertheless the readership must be careful, because the crazies have hijacked the movement, there is a moral danger in looking too closely into human trafficking.

Notice also how the word pedophilia is never even explicitly mentioned. The word they use is trafficking. This is also an act of misdirection.

These people are truly evil.

32
TheRealBuddyB 32 points ago +32 / -0

Nice breakdown. Yeah, it's definitely a headtrip how they are still able to spin these things.

You got to really be a skillful backwards-jumping trapeze artist propoganda master to come up with a way to to defend Cuties and bash Q as nonsense at the same time.

But at this point who gives a damn if Q is real or a Larp?! The overall story arc of elite pedos in Hollywood and politics has been made BLATANTLY and OBVIOUSLY true - by THEMSELVES, not a bunch of internet "conspiracy theorists!"

13
RedDuck 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agreed. They did the best they could but it's still just putting lipstick on a pig.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
10
GoldenEagle1776 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is a spiritual war, if you're somehow OK as a normal person with this because "muh right wing boogeyman" then the devil's already claimed your soul.

4
wholesomekangz100 4 points ago +5 / -1

Helicopter rides for days

2
Granny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, I was wondering why nyt was pinning this controversy on Qanon, of all things. Didn't make sense, but now it does!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
56
MustafaJones 56 points ago +56 / -0

Perhaps the Times needs to a helicopter ride ...

40
The_Litehaus_Abides 40 points ago +41 / -1

Yeah, I've had enough of this filth. 1776 is getting pretty damn close.

20
PartTimeHick 20 points ago +21 / -1

Start planting seeds now, the harvest is coming. Redpills as many as you can.

4
UsernameChecksOutt 4 points ago +4 / -0

At this point we don't even have to try. It's Orange Man vs. Dementia Joe. Any normie with eyes will vote the right way.

Spez: forgot to capitalize the D.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
15
GoldenEagle1776 15 points ago +18 / -3

Pinochet did one thing wrong, he stepped down.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
eupraxia128 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh absolutely, most of new york does.

109
Mythologick 109 points ago +110 / -1

Hijacking the savethechildren movement?

They fucking created it..

28
Democrit 28 points ago +29 / -1

And I would've gotten away with it if weren't for those pesky Q anons and their Q+

17
Sumsuch 17 points ago +17 / -0

Their MO is to hijack every movement that starts gaining traction against them by using their media monopoly.

3
hit_backspace 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just like the rise of the white supremacists, muh Russia and obstruction, muh Russia 2 bounties edition, masks, how bad of a job Trump is doing about the virus...Q is the newly invented hoax for their supporters to attack.

101
MichellesMingy 101 points ago +102 / -1

Brought to you by that same people that said Jeffery Epstein and his pedophile Island were a "wild right wing conspiracy theory".

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
13
the-new-style 13 points ago +14 / -1

but at least they fairly report on more than just the far right

https://www.nytimes.com/search?dropmab=false&query=far-left+conspiracy

oh, never mind

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
87
RuccusRob 87 points ago +87 / -0

Uh, how do you hijack anti-trafficking movement when you pretty much are the anti-trafficking movement at this point?

61
ModernKnight 61 points ago +61 / -0

"Good evening, welcome to American Airlines, this is your captain speaking. I have hijacked your aircraft. We are on schedule to depart on time, and will be arriving at your destination on schedule. Have a nice flight."

19
FromSethWithLove 19 points ago +19 / -0

HAHAHA

15
electricboogaloo 15 points ago +15 / -0

hG 0gFnTV tk4r8 8bOVABct3 023N6p NY6 gxr LIsQx43f7

6
0io- 6 points ago +6 / -0

Finally a terrorist cause we can all support.

4
JoePCool14 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't you just love when you hijack your own car?

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago +2 / -0

AA, Just hope you don't get beat by security up on your flight

21
CQVFEFE 21 points ago +21 / -0

Because in clown world you say the opposite of what the truth is

Always

10
FromSethWithLove 10 points ago +10 / -0

You'd think they would tell the truth occasionally, just to throw us off.

NOPE!

10
CQVFEFE 10 points ago +10 / -0

They aren't smart enough to think like you

And the truth burns their tongue like battery acid

5
wholesomekangz100 5 points ago +6 / -1

They cry out in pain as they strike you

3
Blazeron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or the idea that child exploitation is a conspiracy.... as if pedophiles don't exist?! As if children are never trafficked?! Where have they been.

59
Afeazo 59 points ago +60 / -1

QAnon hijacked the movement? Were they not the ones to start it?

28
CQVFEFE 28 points ago +30 / -2

QAnon hijacked the movement? Were they not the ones to start it?

Correct

When he first said the world is run by satanic pedovores who eat babies, we said it was a "conspiracy theory" and mocked it...now it's accepted as common knowledge by everyone who's even slightly awake

12
plaaaa 12 points ago +12 / -0

soon:

Qanon is high jacking the pizzagate movement

13
Sumsuch 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump is hijacking Obamagate!

7
Afeazo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Soon:

Trump is trying to get Trump re-elected!

4
NvJohansson 4 points ago +4 / -0

You spelled will wrong.

4
ShiffsDeadHooker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, technically pizzagate pre-dates Qanon by a year, roughly.

48
deleted 48 points ago +48 / -0
1
0io- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there somewhere that somebody who has seen the movie explains what the deal with it is? All I got is that it's about some French teen dance troup or something, and netfllix advertised it as being sexy?

2
Lurkmoar347 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m never going to watch it, but according to the broad who made it, it’s supposed to be critical of how society sexualizes young girls. While that’s a noble goal, depicting pre-teen girls twerking in skimpy outfits probably isn’t the best way to achieve that goal.

2
GoldenEagle1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

I really doubt that, sounds like an excuse. Let's just assume she isn't full of shit (she is) her entire argument is literally "CP is bad, let's make a movie that shows CP".

1
0io- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for your reply. I kind of feel like this kind of stuff (getting upset over some movie) distracts from the actual sex predators / pizzagate actual child rape and child trafficking "conspiracy of silence" epstein stuff that has been going on for a long time. Which I guess is the NYT's angle here. Instead of saying we're upset about politicians raping kids, and being blackmailed, and sex slavery, they're making it out that we're upset about stuff you could see a million times a day on TikTok. I don't even have Netflix, not going to see the movie ever either.

42
VinceOnAPlane 42 points ago +42 / -0

Oh, this is why the fake-ass media pushed Q into the spotlight, because "Trump Supporters" was losing steam as their go-to pejorative. They needed something a little more abrasive.

11
CQVFEFE 11 points ago +12 / -1

If Q and his fans were harmful to Trump and America, or to children, or to anyone good, the MSM would be all for it, or shut up about it and let it work.

Instead they are desperately harsh in their sustained, bitter railing and condemnation which arises from hostility, contempt and mortal terror of the truth getting out

If MSM is against it, it's probably OK

6
Corse46 6 points ago +6 / -0

If Q was harmful to children, he would’ve been given a time slot at the DNC this week.

10
OhLollyLollyPop 10 points ago +10 / -0

So now Trump Supporters (Qanon) are supposedly child abusers? Seriously? How stupid are these people and their readers?

18
schiff_for_brains 18 points ago +18 / -0

QAnon followers were also rioting if you believe the news. Seems like they are trying to set up a false flag coming up soon.

9
Corse46 9 points ago +9 / -0

It gives me hope that so many people are identifying this now. As soon as I saw the increase in Q attacks and the media flat out, finally, asking Trump, I thought “false flag incoming.” I’ve seen hundreds here say the same thing. The great awakening.

6
lanre 6 points ago +6 / -0

Same as the fake neo Nazis they hired for Charlottesville. Just recently the media were referencing them as a threat to the nation.

They're so bad at this it's hilarious.

4
Skinagrizz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then you have Juan Williams saying Trump isn't responsible for Qanon violence which tells me that Dems are already talking about it, as such, in their circles.

7
PatrikStar24 7 points ago +7 / -0

If me living in Southern California is of any indication, they are just the right amount of stupid that they believe themselves to be highly intelligent (above anyone else) even if the briefest counter examination says otherwise.

5
Comntrinchief 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly

1
sickofaltspin 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why.

My Spidey sense is tingling like a mother fucker.

34
Dirk_Diggler 34 points ago +34 / -0

False claims about child exploitation? Excuse me, what the fuck? These people are evil as fuck trying to cover for and downplay this shit. Seriously, fuck the MSM to hell.

3
20KAG20 3 points ago +4 / -1

We should start burning them all down in peaceful protests

30
sciencebeforegod 30 points ago +30 / -0

Now we know who (Far Left) sponsored that weird Q Save The Children march in Chicago recently. Sounds like the pedophiles are trying to save themselves. Won’t work. Too fucking late.

29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
27
Pederrr 27 points ago +27 / -0

The media attacks on Q really are lending to the legitimacy of Q.

5
nanowerx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I wasnt fully on board before, but shit is obviously hovering over a target that the media has decided is a no-no.

2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today is going to be a bad day.

PREFACE: Q IS A LARP!

With that said:

So, I'm unsure if anyone has noticed, but all week this week "Q Anon" has suddenly had a mass push in the MSM. Articles in all the big papers of record, mentions by the important RINOs, a direct question during the POTUS press conference on Wednesday, etc.

Well, suddenly, on Friday evening in Chicago this tiny group shows up: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296911307950743552

Suddenly, obvious agent provocateurs are making a quick walk around in Chicago with wwg1wga signs etc carefully filmed to appear like a larger group three days before the RNC where we know that the riots will be front and center. Then you have an explosion in social media posts from these Burn Loot Murderers claiming they are hosting worldwide "Save The Children" protests on August 22, 2020 - here is their openly shared google doc with locations and flyers:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kcIw4M3NIm303fMPa4OZw-Q3FWyzKpKNq9GAdqULt9c/htmlview#

My spidey sense is tingling like fuck. Nothing has stunk this high since Unite the Right - and look how well that worked for these scum.

Imagine how much you could neuter the speeches at the RNC about the rioters. Normies will eat whatever they are spoonfed.

1
ManfredH 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q is classic 4chan. That it's managed to pick up steam shouldn't surprise us. There's always newfags. It's never been violent though. It's like believing in lizard people running everything, or flat earth. A harmless meme.

That the media is trying to attack them is what's interesting. Either they see it as a way to discredit Trump supporters, or they're genuinely afraid of what they might uncover. It wouldn't be the first time 4chan's fun and games resulted in something big being exposed.

24
Fistfulofgreyhair 24 points ago +24 / -0

Oh, my bad. There isn’t any child trafficking, or child exploitation, its just a conspiracy. I guess all the missing kids are behind dryers with the other sock.

Thanks NYT for clearing it up. Now let’s go watch some 11 year girls twerk...i feel so much better now.

3
Blazeron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Murder is also a conspiracy. And car accidents.

"Crime is a conspiracy pushed by white supremacists trying to derail the police reform movement pushed by peaceful protesters." - NYT 2022

24
Ninki333 24 points ago +24 / -0
21
MaxineWaters4Prez 21 points ago +21 / -0

Boy oh boy you never heard qanon in the media before this week. Now they can't get it out of their mouths.

10
JimmyJames 10 points ago +11 / -1

Right? I honestly don’t have an actual opinion about QAnon because I barely ever heard of them until last week. Now QAnon is evidently the latest epithet that far-left communist mouthpieces like CNN are using in place of ‘trumptards’. Ridiculous.

And I still can’t be bothered to form an opinion regarding QAnon yet. If they’re anti child trafficking and abuse, however, I’d stand with them against NetFlix any day.

12
CQVFEFE 12 points ago +12 / -0

Fans of Q are Trump supporters 100%, as Trump said. 100%.

Why else would the media hate them so viciously?

Logical thinking.

6
plaaaa 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think the arrests of elite pedo rings are coming.

2
CQVFEFE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing can stop what's coming

5
FromSethWithLove 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been paying attention for awhile, and I can't really define Q anon enough to say of I'm a "follower", but Trump fighting a satanic cult with rituals that include pedophilia and cannibalism sounds freaking legit, especially with fake noose articles like this

4
OhLollyLollyPop 4 points ago +4 / -0

Building another conspiracy to divert attention from something... Netflix or Maxwell.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

They actually ignored Q for the first year or so and then launched coordinated attacks all on the same day, I believe August 1st 2018. They have since then run hit pieces against Q every so often, but recently they have stepped it up.

2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today is going to be a bad day.

PREFACE: Q IS A LARP!

With that said:

So, I'm unsure if anyone has noticed, but all week this week "Q Anon" has suddenly had a mass push in the MSM. Articles in all the big papers of record, mentions by the important RINOs, a direct question during the POTUS press conference on Wednesday, etc.

Well, suddenly, on Friday evening in Chicago this tiny group shows up: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296911307950743552

Suddenly, obvious agent provocateurs are making a quick walk around in Chicago with wwg1wga signs etc carefully filmed to appear like a larger group three days before the RNC where we know that the riots will be front and center. Then you have an explosion in social media posts from these Burn Loot Murderers claiming they are hosting worldwide "Save The Children" protests on August 22, 2020 - here is their openly shared google doc with locations and flyers:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kcIw4M3NIm303fMPa4OZw-Q3FWyzKpKNq9GAdqULt9c/htmlview#

My spidey sense is tingling like fuck. Nothing has stunk this high since Unite the Right - and look how well that worked for these scum.

Imagine how much you could neuter the speeches at the RNC about the rioters. Normies will eat whatever they are spoonfed.

16
NavyGuy 16 points ago +16 / -0

What in the oxymoron fucking title is this?

We "hijacked" the anti-trafficking movement by exposing child exploitation because its fake? Are they denying child human trafficking altogether? Seriously, du fuk are they going for with this headline?

10
Comntrinchief 10 points ago +10 / -0

It’s nothing more than gaslighting a new false narrative to associate Trump supporters with conspiracy theorists.

This article and many others have spontaneously appeared along with alleged Q protests that include “abolish ICE” signs. They are doing the exact same thing they accused the Russian of doing during the 2016 election. There is literally no difference.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL Q fans would NEVER want to abolish ICE or any police, or commit random violence

Fake news narrative like you said

4
Corse46 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s a clever tactic. Now they can pin anyone trying to “save the children” as a conspiracy theorist. As if we didn’t watch Epstein and then Maxwell get arrested.

1
GoldenEagle1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think this will work. With all the pedo rings being busted and the truth about Hollywood coming out followed by that disgusting movie I think Pandora's Box has been opened.

3
PropagandaWizard1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

This pede gets it!

16
MAGAbeast2016 16 points ago +16 / -0

Nothing to do with QANON.

EVERYONE SHOULD BE AGAINST PEDOPHILLIA, period. If not they should be singled out and crushed as there is no place for them in society

1
Blazeron 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only reason everyone is against pedos is they think the deep state (which doesn't exist either- CNN editors) is full of pedos. It can't be anything related to fucking kids being disgusting.

14
johnbillaby 14 points ago +14 / -0

Poor subhuman trash.

13
MuadDon 13 points ago +13 / -0

“Some” = 1 person, 100 persons, 1000 persons, 0 person, etc. Just straight up angling a narrative.

13
1A_FTW 13 points ago +13 / -0

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

We’re supposed to control the flow of info and narrative on human trafficking and child exploitation!

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +15 / -3
7
CQVFEFE 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nothing to do with anyone or any group, except fellow Trump supporting patriots.

As Trump said, he is loved by the Q movement (which is worldwide)

We want the goddamn fucking child molestation and trafficking to cease

No civilian violence is ever promoted or urged in any way by Q, that's a fake narrative

Instead, THE MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY

11
Wrexxis780 11 points ago +11 / -0

Anybody else remember a decade or so when "Cuties" were supposed to be code for underage children?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Donarudo_Taranpu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's see if, I've used "cutie" and "cuties" to compliment other people's children or girlfriend or wife in a totally innocent way.

I've also used "cuties" the way I use the word "babes" and "chicks" to totally bro out like bro let's hit up those cuties at the bar.

I always thought "cheese" "pizza" and "hotdogs" were sinister code words. Don't take "cuties" from me.

3
Wrexxis780 3 points ago +3 / -0

I honestly wouldn't doubt it if a LOT of "innocent" words have been used for nefarious purposes. If people use it in normal speech, its fine, but if it sounds REALLY SKETCHY in how they are using it, maybe be a little concerned.

8
dixond 8 points ago +8 / -0

Word soup. Just throw a bunch of buzzwords against the wall and see what sticks.

God help us an entire generation of kids have grown up now never being exposed to anything that looks even remotely like Real Journalism. It's terrifying.

5
PropagandaWizard1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

I concur!

7
Democrit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Translation: "The qanon movement is thwarting our efforts to no normalize pedophilia and control human trafficking networks behind the veil of our various partisan corporate networks"

7
bh506407 7 points ago +7 / -0

Something very fishy going on right now with the msm and Qanon.

This save the children movement they speak of sounds like a set up. One of my gf’s super liberal coworkers has been sucked into that movement and is obsessing over it.

Dems love pedos, so this doesn’t make much sense to me. I think they are planning something to smear Trump supporters with this thing.

I’d be weary, that Chicago “q protest” didn’t look like Trump supporters at all. Not a single Trump sign or American flag being held by any of them. It looked more like a bunch of mask wearing cucks.

Make your own decisions about this thing, but please be careful who you associate yourself with, especially if it’s in public.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

Actual Q fans are over the top proud patriots who love Trump like a father

Flags galore at any gathering

1
sickofaltspin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today is going to be a bad day.

PREFACE: Q IS A LARP!

With that said:

So, I'm unsure if anyone has noticed, but all week this week "Q Anon" has suddenly had a mass push in the MSM. Articles in all the big papers of record, mentions by the important RINOs, a direct question during the POTUS press conference on Wednesday, etc.

Well, suddenly, on Friday evening in Chicago this tiny group shows up: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296911307950743552

Suddenly, obvious agent provocateurs are making a quick walk around in Chicago with wwg1wga signs etc carefully filmed to appear like a larger group three days before the RNC where we know that the riots will be front and center. Then you have an explosion in social media posts from these Burn Loot Murderers claiming they are hosting worldwide "Save The Children" protests on August 22, 2020 - here is their openly shared google doc with locations and flyers:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kcIw4M3NIm303fMPa4OZw-Q3FWyzKpKNq9GAdqULt9c/htmlview#

My spidey sense is tingling like fuck. Nothing has stunk this high since Unite the Right - and look how well that worked for these scum.

Imagine how much you could neuter the speeches at the RNC about the rioters. Normies will eat whatever they are spoonfed.

1
bh506407 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I found myself a little surprised that child sex trafficking awareness stuff was making its way through commie circles, then seeing those supposed q people in Chicago really set off alarms.

This is a smear coming.

Here’s an idea for whoever the hell is posting the Q shit.

If you’re truly a Trump supporter, warn all these people who follow you to get out in front of this thing and start spreading the fact that none of them have planned or coordinated any protests.

7
Smubbs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Remember their names

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

We have a list!

7
RedSocks157 7 points ago +8 / -1

I've noticed that Q suddenly is being talked about by these outlets a lot... My guess is they will try to tie things to Qs bullshit in order to discredit them. This being one example. They will no doubt try to use the same tactic on Trump himself.

1
sickofaltspin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today is likely to be Charlottesville 2.0.

Check my recent comments.

5
Capitalist 5 points ago +5 / -0

They do love ad hominem attacks.

5
cook_does 5 points ago +5 / -0

We should just pull this author into the street and hang them from a light post. I have no mercy or quarter to give to a pedo enabler

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think all pedophiles should be executed, as well as all “non-offending” pedophiles. I look at pedophiles the same way I look at rabid dogs. Even if you have a dog with rabies that hasn’t bitten anyone YET, it doesn’t really matter and they should still be put down. But now I am also leaning to executing anyone who defends “non-offending” pedophiles as well. Honestly, we just don’t need these people sucking air. Defend your precious “non-offending” pedophiles all you want, but if you end up getting shot in your defense, I don’t really give a fuck. People who defend pedophiles should probably be executed too. We don’t need you on Earth.

1
GoldenEagle1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you except for one thing. There's no such thing as a "non offending" pedo, their horrid thoughts and high chance of owning CP is good enough reason to hang them.

5
napoleon4321 5 points ago +5 / -0

The New York Slimes continue to show themselves to be a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

4
the_archivist 4 points ago +4 / -0

These are the morons who left their documents openly indexed on Google, allowing even official use only documents to be downloaded from Google.

4
PropagandaWizard1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

That headline is some of the most disgusting word salad I have ever read. It makes no sense what so ever and induces vomit after each reading. Classic NYT.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ha ha

SMELL THE PANIC

4
KeKieChan 4 points ago +4 / -0

soft energy

4
Winter_huntress 4 points ago +4 / -0

At this point I’m just going to assume that any media/celebrity/politician that defends shit like this is a giant blood sucking pedo and the scary thing is I would probably be correct in doing so.

4
KingDevil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Qanon is the new Russia

1
RussianBot_23198a 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sources familiar with even more sources familiar with the White House's kitchen tiles confirm Trump colluded with the hacker known as QAnon (who may or may not be the hacker known as 4chan, who may or may not also be Russian) to win the election.

3
schiff_for_brains 3 points ago +3 / -0

False claims of exploitation?

Look at that Cuties promo picture, and tell me which one of those girls is having fun?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
FromSethWithLove 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Q anon conspiracy theorists" are the fake news' new tea party

3
SiBear117 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some people sure are afraid of a LARP for some reason.

3
HistoryInvestigator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they trying to drive more people to check out QAnon? Because this is what's going to happen.

2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today is going to be a dark day. Check my recent comments.

3
Vailyon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they trying to claim trafficking is not child exploitation?

3
fdagasfd 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm so glad I'm on the side that doesn't like "Cuties".

3
CMDRConanAAnderson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Always post who wrote the article, never let this fall under NYT. Tie the article to the writer.

2
boogalations1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hijacked anti trafficking movements by being actually anti trafficking.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
OrangeManGreatAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

they keep using this word conspiracy. I don't think they know what that word means. they need to replace it with "true story that is being intentionally covered up"

2
MAGATRAIN2k20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny. They haven’t spoken about qanon until last week. Hmmmmmmmmmm

2
koyima 2 points ago +2 / -0

The NYT providing cover for sex traffickers..