492
Comments (75)
sorted by:
34
deleted 34 points ago +35 / -1
19
A_Feral_Duck 19 points ago +21 / -2

Communists, socialists, and fascists have more in common than they care to admit.

During early WW2 the communists and socialists across the US were extremely anti-war. It wasn’t until Hitler turned against Stalin that they started waving their anti-fascism flag and began supporting US involvement in the war.

-2
GODGAMER -2 points ago +7 / -9

Hitler literally rose to stop communism in Germany.

The communists started shit first.

Why the hell do you think they/we are called REACTIONARIES?

6
MrTrumpsWildRide 6 points ago +8 / -2

Bullshit. The nazis rose to power on a platform of blatant socalism. Look up the founding points of the nazi party. Collectivism, redistribution of wealth, nationalization of industry, a duty to work for the greater good of the state. It's blatant communism.

Morons who try to claim the nazis weren't communists because they clashed with soviet style communism are completely misinformed. You think communists never fought with other communists? Stalin killed millions of them himself.

The fact that hitler's socialist regime turned out not to be a peaceful utopia where everyone sang kumaya but rather turned into a brutal warmongering dictatorship and police state is not a point against it being socialist. Quite the opposite actually, that means it turned out like almost all other socialist regimes from Mao to Pol Pot to Il Sung to Castro.

5
the-new-style 5 points ago +6 / -1

A Reactionary is the word French Revolutionaries made up to describe people who wanted to return to pre revolutionary Monarchy.

The National Socialists thought the communists were doing socialism wrong

Socialism is possible only in a state that is united domestically and free internationally. The bourgeoisie and Marxism are responsible for failing to reach both goals, domestic unity and international freedom. No matter how national and social these two forces present themselves, they are the sworn enemies of a socialist national state.

Joseph Goebbels (1932)

0
GODGAMER 0 points ago +4 / -4

Yeah, and words change with time.

Nowadays, anyone on the right who isn't a "conservative", i.e. con inc. is a reactionary by the worlds standards.

And yeah, they did think communists were doing socialism wrong.

National Socialists' main goal is literally in the name.

And Hitler had a very different viewing of socialism compared to marx and the like.

2
GoldenEagle1776 2 points ago +4 / -2

Hitler knew one thing that we refuse to understand because "muh moral high ground" he saw how the communists used propaganda and turned it against them.

-2
tokenninja [S] -2 points ago +3 / -5

Looks like we got a live one boys

-3
Slyhillary -3 points ago +1 / -4

The left is desperate with this

10
streakybacon 10 points ago +14 / -4

Hitler was just a different brand of communist.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
0
streakybacon 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you're implying all I know about Hitler comes from movies, you're wrong.

I know there's a lot more nuance to that era, but it is what it is too.

Communist/socialist/facists groups had different centers back then, formed under different "schools" of thought. It isn't like now where this all sounds like a cartoon.

Back then Hitler hated the Eastern communists, the Marxists etc. But he still formed his own socialist movement. He hated the nihilism of those movements for instance, but liked the idea of nationalising industries etc.

I know it's a long topic but Hitler was essentially a communist with a different branding and slightly different methodology.

What pins it all together is that the State is enacting it's will by force and in a totalitarian manner for the "good of the people" so to speak. That force can call itself whatever it wants - facist/communist/butterflytarian - but it it what it is and it ain't freedom.

-1
GODGAMER -1 points ago +4 / -5

Seriously, I guarantee if people here heard a Hitler speech with no context to who it is, they'd agree with a lot of issues he had with germany at the time.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
Dang -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nah. The United States completely destroyed nazi Germany and it wasn't even close.

We turned german socialists into piles of rubble.

American capitalism will always be better than german socialism.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Dang 1 point ago +2 / -1

Europe was and is a socialist shithole that is spreading here. We should have allowed Patton to role through Germany and onto Russia.

6
vicentezo04 6 points ago +6 / -0

This. It's been a long time since I've seen Generation Kill but Sgt. Colbert basically says that those who are willing to use force will always have power over those who aren't.

And that's why we should never give up our guns.

5
DZP1 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree but propose that they combine the best of two worlds: they are Commies and also goose-stepping little fascists, and sociopathic liars and ... oh, I've run out of their good qualities and now have to continue with their bad ones. And that list is long.

3
Omgwtfbbq 3 points ago +4 / -1

They’re both very authoritarian, dystopian ideologies.

14
Mother_of_gains 14 points ago +14 / -0

They're Communists. Their tactics aren't much different than Lenin in 1917.

Communists are worse than Nazis for the simple reason that they still exist in large numbers and wield massive amounts of power. They must be crushed.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
9
lixa 9 points ago +9 / -0

Democrats lack the discipline of Nazis. Nazis had order. They were clean cut. (Just trying to think of some positives. Apparently it’s easier to think of positives with Nazis than democrats which is really saying something.) Democrats are more like the CCP, which actually is probably because they ARE the CCP.

0
GODGAMER 0 points ago +6 / -6

With Nazis, at least the people who fit the brand had a good life.

Under communism, literally no one but like 12 people have a good life.

6
Dang 6 points ago +7 / -1

Democrats are super obsessed with identity politics. Yeap, checks out, democrats are super gay nazis.

2
MAH3A2HO 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.dineshdsouza.com/news/sex-pervert-as-anti-fascist/

"As was widely recognized in the 1920s and 1930s, a significant number of the Nazi Brownshirts, including the group’s head, Ernst Rohm, were homosexual. William Shirer tells us that the head of the Munich Brownshirts, Edmund Heines, was not only gay but also a convicted murderer. The Communists and Social Democrats derided the Nazi Brownshirts by calling them names like the Brotherhood of Poofs in the Brown House."

1
Dang 1 point ago +1 / -0

U/godgamer is obsessed with this gay shit hahah.

6
ar86ar86 6 points ago +6 / -0

Huh. I guess history does repeat itself.

6
bh506407 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s almost as if they want their Antifa goons to make sure they can keep their states blue because they are worried about the incoming landslide of Trump voters.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
bh506407 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they underestimate how ready people are to crawl over broken glass to vote for Trump.

But we need to remember that not all people are strong enough to take on a mob blocking a polling place.

If you see these fuckers on Election Day trying their bullshit, we need to make sure we have strong pedes ready to protect those who may not be strong enough to deal with this stuff on their own.

2
ProdigalPlaneswalker 2 points ago +2 / -0

these fuckers on Election Day

They might target the poll workers. Most poll workers I've seen in the past are old folks. The rioters have shown they're willing to assault the elderly. Heck, the real purpose of Covid-1984 may be to terrorize the elderly from volunteering to work the polls.

5
tonightm16 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well if you know what actually happened with "police forces" in Germany and its build-up to war they really became more of a military force.

It's more complex than this statement. Maybe at the start but he had no reason to defund the police as he was in charge of the police.

Biden won't defund the police. He will just put steps into place to recruit more socialists into the police.

You should go look up what German police forces did in Poland during and after the invasion. They had to bring them in because normal German forces couldn't handle (mainly mentally) the mass killing of Jews and other civilians in Poland.

They would operate behind the main German lines moving from village to village.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

99% of the statements comparing the Nazis with the Democrats of today are bullshit. I guess it started as a way to troll the left, and then some people our side took it seriously.

2
tonightm16 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing I argue about in regards to the Nazis is when people think they are far right. When they were an ideology of socialism.

But that was mainly born of out the lie from WW2 when the Allies had to ally themselves with the USSR. So people didn't ask why their governments were fighting a socialist country with another just as bad socialist country.

Germany was National socialists and the Democrats are communists.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's because left/right is meaningless. It's a simplification for normies, but anyone who is into politics should move away from it.

If you want to seize the wealth of corporations and you want to put gays in camps, are you left or right? You want national healthcare and you want to promote the middle class, are you left or right?

See, it's impossible to define.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

You use the term "Nazi" to say a generic "authoritarian". That is wrong. National-Socialism is a complex and specific ideology, while authoritarianism is a constant in human civilization.

I'd say the ancient pharaoh was authoritarian too.

Hell, even the pre-Chinavirus America was authoritarian to require a loisence for simply cutting hair, forbidding to feed the homeless, or have regulations for collecting rainwater in your backyard.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Commiesarenotpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

Genuine question.. The side that was doing the rioting, burning, and beating up of citizens is the side that gained votes?

3
Fluffy_Indigo 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard to vote when they're beating you on the way to or at the voting booth. I imagine a lot of people, disarmed and demoralized, decided to stay home. And who knows how the votes were counted or who even counted them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
ContraryCynic 1 point ago +1 / -0

After the Vienna Convention? They would have elected anyone so long as he promised to pay the blood back. They were burning marks in stoves because paper money was cheaper than firewood.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you don't think that Hitler invented an interesting and sound ideology that tried to take the best elements from socialism and the best elements from capitalism?

Have you ever heard of the so called third position?

2
DarkestMatt 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are no good elements from socialism. None. I’ve thought what you are thinking now and crawled out.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Social unity? National and social identity? Solidarity with people who are unable to work?

Not having international corporations, foreign billionaires, and banking elites rape your ass?

-1
GODGAMER -1 points ago +4 / -5

Seriously, i dont have the picture on hand, but there were a few photos of like 20000+ people in a stadium for Nazi America.

It was very popular.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes that was the Madison Square garden

2
tonightm16 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean in Germany at that time if you think it was enforced or not, not many people were voting against Hitler.

But comparing 1930s Germany to America today isn't really the thing to do. Or even China in the late 1930s and early 1940s. The closest comparison would be the communist movements in Russia in the 1910s-20 and communist movements in Europe in the 1920s and early 1930s. Spain and France being the focus.

2
Commiesarenotpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems pretty Weimar-y to me...

1
BerlinPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

But not that many people were voting for him either...Hitler never got an absolute majority. The best the NSDAP did was 43,9% in 1933. And by that time, they already imprisoned most of their political enemies.

The NSDAP and the KPD (communist party) were both financed by the international banking elites. Basically, an experiment to see how far they can go in one direction or another.

What most people do not know: The Weimarer republic, while hated by most voters in Germany (the conservatives wanted monarchy back and what the others wanted is known) was coming up quite beautiful in 1920s. The economy was in a recovery.

Then, of course, Black Friday. The Weimarer Republic was never meant to blossom...

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Commiesarenotpeople 1 point ago +2 / -1

In that case, I think they made the right choice.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
yzzp 2 points ago +2 / -0

We all innately knew it was about breaking down societal protections not to fix the police 🥱🥱🥱

1
BidensHairyLegs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy shit. That's a red pill and a half

1
ContraryCynic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Main difference being, Goring was actually quite competent at his job.

1
Winter_Is_Coming2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

They think the time is right, according to the YT vid on their plan to destroy America. I think Soros wants to see it in his lifetime and he’s Old AF.

1
wearefeverpitch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone have any more information on n Hitler's rise to power and the tactics he used? I'd love to be able to post this to friends with a link to more information and a "would you like to know more" tab.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
DonTread 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nazis were national socialists.

Democrats are communists.

Hitlers rise to power came from demonizing communism and bolstering nationalism.

But I'm sure they don't actually teach the real history in school anymore so I'm not surprised the vast majority of people don't know this.

2
freeperjim 2 points ago +3 / -1

N.A.Z.I. = National German SOCIALIST Workers Party

NAZI Socialism is just a branch/brand name of Karl Marx's cult of leftism

NAZI had "Brownshirts" as their terrorist enforcers

DNC has KKK, ANTIFA, BLM as their terrorist enforcers

NAZI had Josef Mengele as their satanic "doctor" to perform "experiments on humans

DNC has Planned Parenthood as their satanic "doctor" to perform "experiments on humans

NAZI had Josef Goebbels as their "Minister of Propaganda"

DNC has the "media" as their "Ministers of Propaganda"

NAZI enforced gun confiscation

DNC pushing gun confiscation

NAZI had government health care

DNC pushing government health care

1
DonTread 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude. Hitler's hated Karl Marx. Read mein Kampf. Hitler hated Communists.

1
DarkestMatt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Karl Marx didn’t invent leftism you dummy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OrangeManGreatAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats are satanists. they've always existed.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-1
GODGAMER -1 points ago +6 / -7

I'm honestly disappointed to see this.

This is like uber boomer tier shit man.