It's Dycus v Dycus so I guess one Dycus is trying to divorce the other Dycus who probably does not want the divorce and is arguing that Nebraska's current divorce laws violate the state constitution.
edit: https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/dycus-v-dycus : Michael and Debra Dycus got divorced, trial court gave Debra sole ownership of the residence and required Michael to pay her attorney's fees. Michael is arguing that the law this decision is based on is unconstitutional, hence Thomas More Society's friend of the court brief which also argues that the law is unconstitutional.
Curious to see what the case looks like legally.
It's Dycus v Dycus so I guess one Dycus is trying to divorce the other Dycus who probably does not want the divorce and is arguing that Nebraska's current divorce laws violate the state constitution.
edit: https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/dycus-v-dycus : Michael and Debra Dycus got divorced, trial court gave Debra sole ownership of the residence and required Michael to pay her attorney's fees. Michael is arguing that the law this decision is based on is unconstitutional, hence Thomas More Society's friend of the court brief which also argues that the law is unconstitutional.