Or they werent gonna die anyways and just happened to be on it. Theyd rather withold the drug then assume it possobly could be working and possibly coildnt while 200,000 die.
Thats the democratic death cult cheering each death as another talking point.
Everytime they hear there was another death they get excited. Its disgusting.
They did multiple biased studies to make it fail. They knew proper dose and either OD or under dosed people. They knew that HCQ was effective if taken early, so they did studies on people on ventilators. They had a study where the the participants never saw the doctor, they emailed or skyped. They had a study where they never intended to give COVID+ patients HCQ, they were to give every actual patient vitamin C. They had a study by a BS group that was set up not long before publishing the now retracted study.
It was all intentionally set up to fail. Despite independent doctors seeing success as well as countries that used it seeing far lower numbers than those that didn't, and world leaders taking it/hoarding it.
I develop a lot of the chronic condition reporting for a company and that VA study was the worst.
They picked members that had multiple co-morbiddies, and like the serious ones. I remember seeing cancer patients on there
They gave the HCQ without the full stack in the z-pac, and they gave it to them way too late.
That report STILL SHOWED that the members that had it early enough were LESS likely to go to ventilators. And they had a higher discharge rate...but the amount of people that DIED during the study got the focus.
Also, and most importantly, there were multiple people on that report that had money/funding by the Gilead Sciences company. Those people made Remdesivir.
For anyone new to this ,Remdesivir is known for:
Being $1000 a pill versus I think $6 a pill with HCQ. (I cant remember the numbers but I know I've seen reports that said the entire HCQ treatment package (6 days of pills) is like less than $100 in generic drugs
Remdesivir/Gilead can be tied to ownership/stake by Faucci
and Remmy had really poor phase 3 trials. Phase 3 trials are when they open up the test subjects to like 3k people instead of <100. (Not a pharmacist so please don't attack me if I am off by the numbers exactly). But this means that it worked at a good percentage when the pool was <100, but it wasn't spectacular results for larger groups.
So what happened with HCQ? Did it end up not being as good as we thought? Please be honest here guys, I just wanna know
Or they werent gonna die anyways and just happened to be on it. Theyd rather withold the drug then assume it possobly could be working and possibly coildnt while 200,000 die.
Thats the democratic death cult cheering each death as another talking point. Everytime they hear there was another death they get excited. Its disgusting.
Exactly. It's so sad that democrats can only get the prescriptions for the fish tank cleaner.
It's actually better than this if you get it in the early stages of infection. Nearly all the FUD focuses on when it is only applied in late stage.
It does work on Democrats (and RINOs) but they need emotional support.
I'm going to steal this and make a meme, keep an eye on new
edit:
https://thedonald.win/p/GvFkRoOv/president-trumps-new-chynavirus-/c/
https://media.thedonald.win/post/BPjwzdOF.png
Go with Groucho Marx glasses
lol niceee
Nice job
It'll be prescribed under its brand name: MillerChlorQuin.
I don't know why I laughed so much at this comment.
Hydroxychloroking
https://thedonald.win/p/GvFkS532/-white-house-announces-hydroxych/c/
Gin and tonic. I knew it!
It works well prophylactic and in early stages.
https://c19study.com
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330574/
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext
https://detroit.cbslocal.com/2020/07/02/henry-ford-health-system-study-hydroxychloroquine-lowers-covid-19-death-rate/
Kayleigh says therapeutic so it seems like they gonna talk about an actual cure I think.
They did multiple biased studies to make it fail. They knew proper dose and either OD or under dosed people. They knew that HCQ was effective if taken early, so they did studies on people on ventilators. They had a study where the the participants never saw the doctor, they emailed or skyped. They had a study where they never intended to give COVID+ patients HCQ, they were to give every actual patient vitamin C. They had a study by a BS group that was set up not long before publishing the now retracted study.
It was all intentionally set up to fail. Despite independent doctors seeing success as well as countries that used it seeing far lower numbers than those that didn't, and world leaders taking it/hoarding it.
The VA study was a hit piece.
I develop a lot of the chronic condition reporting for a company and that VA study was the worst.
For anyone new to this ,Remdesivir is known for:
Or waited too long.
It is still a viable therapy but Ivermectin may be even better.
https://thedonald.win/p/GvFkRX9N/x/c/15JUHEh07M