First, which masks? Second, could it have been other policies like touchless transactions? Third, while not completely effective was there a shield? Fourth, limits of the experiment like perhaps to get a headline they didn't really test the employees just observed for symptoms?
Look, fat. I know all you Republican science deniers think that science is about critical thought and exploring alternate explanations. It's not. It's about listening to what experts like Corn Pop and Dr. Faucet have to say.
I dont believe anything posted to that sub or in regards to stories that laud efficacy of muzzles. This plandemic has ended what little trust i had in "medical experts" or public policymakers. I assume it's all fake to push an agenda until proven otherwise
First, which masks? Second, could it have been other policies like touchless transactions? Third, while not completely effective was there a shield? Fourth, limits of the experiment like perhaps to get a headline they didn't really test the employees just observed for symptoms?
Look, fat. I know all you Republican science deniers think that science is about critical thought and exploring alternate explanations. It's not. It's about listening to what experts like Corn Pop and Dr. Faucet have to say.
They have no idea if any of those 56 people actually caught CCPvirus from this person in Starbucks.
The whole thing is bs
I dont believe anything posted to that sub or in regards to stories that laud efficacy of muzzles. This plandemic has ended what little trust i had in "medical experts" or public policymakers. I assume it's all fake to push an agenda until proven otherwise
That doesn't make an ounce of sense. A covid patients? Why is a patient at a Starbucks?
Also coffee service is unidirectional, so obviously the staff is at less of a risk.
Masks don't do anything.