805
Comments (35)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
2flathat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Applying something topically is entirely different than injecting it into the body of a child with an immature immune system. Removing it from early childhood vaccinations now is like a day late and a dollar short. Curious...

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was removed from routine childhood vaccinations a long time ago. And applying a comparatively large quantity of the substances to broken skin fairly frequently is not significantly different immunologically, from subcutaneous injection of a much smaller quantity on a very few occasions. Nobody's saying it's healthy to get significant amounts of this stuff into your body, but the amount in routine childhood vaccinations has never been shown to cause any harm.

1
2flathat 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm a retired RN. What pharmaceutical company pays your salary? Grand babies won't be filled with your garbage. When my oldest was young the doctors were pushing a new vaccine, I forget what thing it was supposed to prevent. She wasn't going to be dumped off in daycare so I said no. Surprise, surprise... I few years down the road the children that received the vaccine had necrotic bowel syndrome. Message to new parents that read this: Be the last in line for what ever new junk they want to inject into your babies. Space out their necessary injections and never more than one at a time.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4843a5.htm

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you can't even remember what vaccine you're referring to, but you're sure that "years down the road the children that received the vaccine had necrotic bowel syndrome", and if I don't believe your story, I must be a big pharma shill. Got it.

The world is a safer place with you being retired from nursing.

1
2flathat 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4843a5.htm

Ad hominem attacks prove nothing.