1892
Comments (97)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
Crlsniper 6 points ago +6 / -0

This weirdly enough had Tim pool complaining about this was too authoritarian or something this morning, these seem pretty reasonable for rioters or terrorists. They just need to actually enforce them.

3
Executor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think his reasoning was around the idea of who in government decides what an illegal protest becomes. Rioting or opposition? Having this for the former is all good but for the latter, it needs to be put down. This could come to bite the people of TN if a Commicrat comes into power in the Governor's office. We already see what they're doing to their states. This would only empower them if they win.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
fallingjune 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was making the presentation that the current rules just needed to be enforced. Which I agree they do, but the rub was he acted like TN had the same non enforcement as Fort Worth or Portland which is not the case to my knowledge. Increasing penalty to remove people from voting population who are actively against our country actually seems like a prudent measure for now.

The only valid part of his argument to me was be careful what laws you create because they maybe one day turned on you, unfairly too because of subjective framing in an arrest record. At some point these should be rolled back to lesser charges.

0
Useful_Vidiots 0 points ago +1 / -1

Pool the Fool.