Do they think they can win an armed Civil War? How?
Hmmm, let's see... They own the media, the telecoms, the Deep State, the law, most of the Government, almost all the higher ranks of the DoD, education, and have foreign allies. Yes they can win an armed Civil War. Just because they're anti 2A doesn't mean they're powerless.
how are they going to win it? a bunch of goat fuckers with pick up trucks and ak 47s have been able to frustrate and oppose the most powerful military force on the planet for the better part of 20 years
that same incredibly powerful military force over the last 20 years sent home a great deal of veterans who learned first hand the trade of fighting a guerilla war. in the (unlikely) event that the majority of the uniformed military service sides with the globalists you will see the most legendary insurgency in the history of recorded warfare. it will be worth your life to drive 500 feet on any highway in america.
They weren’t trying to win. I’m sure many times the rules of engagement got our guys killed. They were just making it perpetual. Obomber was pulling back probably with plans of another mid-East country. Winning doesn’t sale tanks and planes and curing illnesses doesn’t sale prescription drugs.
I’m not over looking this at all I just think I wasn’t being clear. I’ve been collecting means of self preservation for many years. The people I know and associate with wouldn’t put up with the Portland deal in our towns. I get the point of the thread. I was simply pointing out that no one who started a war in the Middle East had plans of winning it. Our guys on the ground might have been but the people who put them there weren’t. I was just making a point that the people who decided to go to war also owned stock in companies that directly profited from it. To your point we are on the same team. I believe in freedom and the constitution and believe that there are enough patriots to hold back this from happening. I agree with everything you said BTW
The homefront advantage, and having nowhere else to go, nothing else to lose, has ALWAYS been a determining factor in warfare, as long as history has been recorded.
People don’t realize we have millions of combat veterans walking the streets today, and while they lack the money and equipment of our current active duty, those currently on active duty collectively have little combat experience, most units are not deploying into much more than sustainment positions.
I discharged in 2011, my peer group that stayed would be in the 10-15 year service experience now. We were drilled on a consistent basis our role to protect the constitution and how we would not turn on the US public (was a genuine concern at the start of the Obama era, at least in my units). The pentagon is severally disconnected from the enlisted side of things.
Some of us have been waiting our entire adult lives for this fight. I honestly thought it would never come in my lifetime. After all, how many generations enjoyed stateside peace outside of the Revolutionary and Civil War?
well the war of 1812 also, but I understand your point. Throughout its history America has been truly blessed to very rarely ever have to see what true conflict and warfare is like on their own soil.
This is the thing, you have the other side who is filled with dickheads who haven't ever really experienced what the real desperation of conflict is right, then you have our side which overwhelmingly has veterans that understand the darkest possible side of human nature.
Aside from all other reasons available that we would, in the event of a big igloo, win bigly; you have the effect of morale over a period of time. You said it yourself, some of us have been waiting our whole lives for this fight. In the pursuit of freedom and ridding our glorious nation of the Marxist infestation we would endure misery they can't even conceive of. This is why I say it'd be a Thunderdome lasting about a week. After a week of starving bellies and watching most of the people they knew end up as an unidentifiable mass of red flesh, they'd go full Iraqi and start surrendering to news crews if it got them food.
The majority of plans fighting against America is wait us out. We had 20 years worth of logistics, databases, etc but the patience of the American people is the weak point.
You're getting downvoted but dishing facts. As hard as they are to digest they are true and people need to acknowledge this long-term if we ever are to go to war with an effective strategy.
Hmmm, let's see... They own the media, the telecoms, the Deep State, the law, most of the Government, almost all the higher ranks of the DoD, education, and have foreign allies. Yes they can win an armed Civil War. Just because they're anti 2A doesn't mean they're powerless.
how are they going to win it? a bunch of goat fuckers with pick up trucks and ak 47s have been able to frustrate and oppose the most powerful military force on the planet for the better part of 20 years
that same incredibly powerful military force over the last 20 years sent home a great deal of veterans who learned first hand the trade of fighting a guerilla war. in the (unlikely) event that the majority of the uniformed military service sides with the globalists you will see the most legendary insurgency in the history of recorded warfare. it will be worth your life to drive 500 feet on any highway in america.
They weren’t trying to win. I’m sure many times the rules of engagement got our guys killed. They were just making it perpetual. Obomber was pulling back probably with plans of another mid-East country. Winning doesn’t sale tanks and planes and curing illnesses doesn’t sale prescription drugs.
Wolverines mothrfucker.
Wolverines
I’m not over looking this at all I just think I wasn’t being clear. I’ve been collecting means of self preservation for many years. The people I know and associate with wouldn’t put up with the Portland deal in our towns. I get the point of the thread. I was simply pointing out that no one who started a war in the Middle East had plans of winning it. Our guys on the ground might have been but the people who put them there weren’t. I was just making a point that the people who decided to go to war also owned stock in companies that directly profited from it. To your point we are on the same team. I believe in freedom and the constitution and believe that there are enough patriots to hold back this from happening. I agree with everything you said BTW
Great post. Now I have an erection.
That's ridiculous.
Here's some recorded history for you.
People don’t realize we have millions of combat veterans walking the streets today, and while they lack the money and equipment of our current active duty, those currently on active duty collectively have little combat experience, most units are not deploying into much more than sustainment positions.
I discharged in 2011, my peer group that stayed would be in the 10-15 year service experience now. We were drilled on a consistent basis our role to protect the constitution and how we would not turn on the US public (was a genuine concern at the start of the Obama era, at least in my units). The pentagon is severally disconnected from the enlisted side of things.
Exactly.
Some of us have been waiting our entire adult lives for this fight. I honestly thought it would never come in my lifetime. After all, how many generations enjoyed stateside peace outside of the Revolutionary and Civil War?
well the war of 1812 also, but I understand your point. Throughout its history America has been truly blessed to very rarely ever have to see what true conflict and warfare is like on their own soil.
This is the thing, you have the other side who is filled with dickheads who haven't ever really experienced what the real desperation of conflict is right, then you have our side which overwhelmingly has veterans that understand the darkest possible side of human nature.
Aside from all other reasons available that we would, in the event of a big igloo, win bigly; you have the effect of morale over a period of time. You said it yourself, some of us have been waiting our whole lives for this fight. In the pursuit of freedom and ridding our glorious nation of the Marxist infestation we would endure misery they can't even conceive of. This is why I say it'd be a Thunderdome lasting about a week. After a week of starving bellies and watching most of the people they knew end up as an unidentifiable mass of red flesh, they'd go full Iraqi and start surrendering to news crews if it got them food.
The majority of plans fighting against America is wait us out. We had 20 years worth of logistics, databases, etc but the patience of the American people is the weak point.
You're getting downvoted but dishing facts. As hard as they are to digest they are true and people need to acknowledge this long-term if we ever are to go to war with an effective strategy.
We could start with national leadership, a communications network and a coordinated plan of action.
They can lock us out of the internet. That's real power.
We'll make our own Internet. With Blackjack. And hookers!
The media could convince the demotards that Chinese/UN troops on US soil are here to protect our democracy against the "nazis"
Who wins the civil war depends entirely on how it starts, the circumstances and context.
Kek,Key, imagine thinking a war is won in the first battle. Cringe bro