4225 () 🔥 FIRE & FURY 💥 posted 234 days ago by APlaceInTheSun 234 days ago by APlaceInTheSun +4225 / -0 570 comments share 570 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (570) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 107 ▼ – Magus_Strife 107 points 234 days ago +108 / -1 I think Tim Pool said they shot one of the dudes. Peppered with buck shot in the face. That's a pretty damn effective warning shot, imo. permalink save report block reply ▲ 79 ▼ – tufftoffee 79 points 234 days ago +79 / -0 Based. Only "warning shot" you should give is one to the face permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 22 ▼ – kanabiis 22 points 234 days ago +29 / -7 warning shots are illegal in all 50 states, if you have to pull your gun and use it, the bullet better hit a target. You are accountable for every bullet fired out of your gun, if you fire a bullet as a warning you are clearly not in danger. and knowing is half the battle. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – Carolina 6 points 234 days ago +9 / -3 Which is a ridiculous law, I think. It's better to warn than to hit someone. And, warning may be illegal, but I bet there's more legal repercussion from actually hitting someone, including civil lawsuits. permalink parent save report block reply
I think Tim Pool said they shot one of the dudes. Peppered with buck shot in the face. That's a pretty damn effective warning shot, imo.
Based. Only "warning shot" you should give is one to the face
warning shots are illegal in all 50 states, if you have to pull your gun and use it, the bullet better hit a target.
You are accountable for every bullet fired out of your gun, if you fire a bullet as a warning you are clearly not in danger.
and knowing is half the battle.
Which is a ridiculous law, I think. It's better to warn than to hit someone. And, warning may be illegal, but I bet there's more legal repercussion from actually hitting someone, including civil lawsuits.