2852
Comments (115)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
166
Discount_Lion_Safari 166 points ago +166 / -0

Can't you shoot people for stealing at night in TX?

123
PoohClimbsTrees 123 points ago +123 / -0

Yes, it is actually part of the LTC training. (Concealed Carry License)

Texas statutes say that you can, if you act reasonably, use deadly force against someone committing a theft during the nighttime.

70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
88
Barbs 88 points ago +88 / -0

Well, you just can’t use bait. You have to give them a sporting chance.

45
SuperDuperHypersonic 45 points ago +45 / -0

The most dangerous game

28
Bragg 28 points ago +28 / -0

What about throwing a MAGA Hat on the lawn?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
Cyer6 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because lefties will say "that's not fair!"

2
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 2 points ago +2 / -0

So leaving a social security check visable would be a no-no?

28
MrBlack 28 points ago +28 / -0

Yes, what if I set a blind up in a tree and use NVG's, that seems pretty reasonable.

9
travistd6789 9 points ago +9 / -0

kek

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
22
TGNX 22 points ago +22 / -0

"Hello, police?" BLAM

"Someone just tried to steal a sign off my lawn."

11
MaxineWaters4Prez 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's reasonable to shoot communists.

10
Er_hast_mich 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Reasonable" in law is usually tied to the negligence definition of "the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would observe under a given set of circumstances."

But I don't know what the specific statue says or if that's the same definition Texas uses in criminal law.

8
El-Duderino 8 points ago +8 / -0

That standard of care quote basically means it's up to the jury.

7
Belgian_Rofl 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is NO PRESUMPTION OF REASONABLENESS WHEN DEFENDING PROPERTY

Presumption of reasonableness applies in the case when they were a direct threat to your well being and you used a adequate amount of force to stop them, e.g. self defense

What this means is that you still have to meet the reasonableness standard, but the jury will be the ultimate arbiter of reasonableness of conduct, not as iron clad as presumption of reasonableness.

Texas law penal code 9.41(b):

(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.

(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor;  or

(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.

3
whoscout 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is nighttime anywhere ok? "Officer, it was nighttime in Honolulu."

7
Nimblenavigator1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is for those times when you’re not at home! 😉

6
InterloperKO 6 points ago +6 / -0

In that case, I choose copper clad ammo. Shooting intensifies for running off with my copper

4
Patriot76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Based Fucking Texas

1
TheTexan 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you catch them. You can shoot them for stealing during the day. Weasels tend to do this shit when you are asleep. They don't work for a living