She was trying to get as much video of the violent, threatening terrorists as possible, so maybe she didn't figure it was in her interest to open fire. If she started poking holes in them, the video would have had an entirely different theme. xD
They are most certainly terrorists. The most disturbing part is that these TERRORISTS have the support of a MULTI-BILLION-DOLLAR fake "news" industry. It's disturbing. The public MUST be made to understand that relationship! Those responsible for supporting terrorism MUST be brought to justice! How long do we need to wait for this!?
You are a retard. Let's ignore the fact she may not have a conceal carry so she can't legally carry or she is a new gun owner and covid made it impossible to get the permit etc. Don't make inferences of one picture you fucking clown.
So she should open fire on other unarmed people? They picked up a cone and were harassing her but her life would be over if she shot any of these fuckwits. Yeah I love coming on her and see people trying to incite violence among others while they talk shit behind a keyboard. You are making this site look like shit fuck off. I'll just assume you are a giant pussy who wont do shit when the time comes
Enough of these pieces of shit pushing people around. Absolutely the time has come for them to learn american citizens have the right to defend themselves.
Yes defend themselves 100% that means more than immediately going to shoot people and possibly face quite a while in jail though. Cone does not equal deadly force. A good lawyer could show the blm riots other instances of violence at the riots etc but still could lose. Easy to be arm chair rambo and lawyer like half this site when you don't have to face the consequences. I also don't know where that was so laws vary massively between states. What people on here fail to understand is just how good blm and antifa are at skirting the line of what would cause deadly force to be a reasonable response to. Cops ain't allowed to defend themselves anymore you think a civilian gonna get a fair trial in a Dem run city?
I'm not even reading past do you know how self defense laws work because I do and you are not winning that case of shooting people over the traffic cone. A good lawyer can argue the totality of the circumstances blm riots other attacks on people etc but a jury will not say a gun is a reasonable response to a 3 lb traffic cone. Idk where that video was from or the exact laws of that area.
I sound like a commie sympathizer... Fuck off. You are a tough guy on the internet saying she should just shoot them when you don't understand the law and how it is put in to practice in the real world. Easy to say yeah she should shoot them when you aren't facing the consequences she will. Fuck out of here retard.
"The picture is intended to show she likes guns" lol As they say, "wut"? Where did you see a "picture" of her 'liking guns'? It's a video. There was no gun. There were only media-backed marxist terrorists.
"The picture is intended to show she likes guns and maybe trying to scare people off.", "an image of her shooting at the range on her Twatter profile." Ohhhh, now I see; the TERRORIST mob failed to check the victim's twitter profile, noticing a photo from the range, and taking it as a warning to stop being TERRORISTS. How could this be?! How negligent of them!!! xD
She was trying to get as much video of the violent, threatening terrorists as possible, so maybe she didn't figure it was in her interest to open fire. If she started poking holes in them, the video would have had an entirely different theme. xD
She succeeded. I was worried for her safety.
Those are not protestors. Those are terrorists.
They are most certainly terrorists. The most disturbing part is that these TERRORISTS have the support of a MULTI-BILLION-DOLLAR fake "news" industry. It's disturbing. The public MUST be made to understand that relationship! Those responsible for supporting terrorism MUST be brought to justice! How long do we need to wait for this!?
Whoa you cracked the case. Women aren’t tough.
Nurture-fag detected.
Woah. You sound like one of the coward protestors in this video.
BLM needs to go after rap "artists" with such vigor.
• We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.
You are a retard. Let's ignore the fact she may not have a conceal carry so she can't legally carry or she is a new gun owner and covid made it impossible to get the permit etc. Don't make inferences of one picture you fucking clown.
So she should open fire on other unarmed people? They picked up a cone and were harassing her but her life would be over if she shot any of these fuckwits. Yeah I love coming on her and see people trying to incite violence among others while they talk shit behind a keyboard. You are making this site look like shit fuck off. I'll just assume you are a giant pussy who wont do shit when the time comes
Enough of these pieces of shit pushing people around. Absolutely the time has come for them to learn american citizens have the right to defend themselves.
Yes defend themselves 100% that means more than immediately going to shoot people and possibly face quite a while in jail though. Cone does not equal deadly force. A good lawyer could show the blm riots other instances of violence at the riots etc but still could lose. Easy to be arm chair rambo and lawyer like half this site when you don't have to face the consequences. I also don't know where that was so laws vary massively between states. What people on here fail to understand is just how good blm and antifa are at skirting the line of what would cause deadly force to be a reasonable response to. Cops ain't allowed to defend themselves anymore you think a civilian gonna get a fair trial in a Dem run city?
wait till the bear that they poke( us ) wakes up
I'm not even reading past do you know how self defense laws work because I do and you are not winning that case of shooting people over the traffic cone. A good lawyer can argue the totality of the circumstances blm riots other attacks on people etc but a jury will not say a gun is a reasonable response to a 3 lb traffic cone. Idk where that video was from or the exact laws of that area.
I sound like a commie sympathizer... Fuck off. You are a tough guy on the internet saying she should just shoot them when you don't understand the law and how it is put in to practice in the real world. Easy to say yeah she should shoot them when you aren't facing the consequences she will. Fuck out of here retard.
you're glowing
And also retarded
So you can read minds? Gotcha.
Only other explanation is that you're the female in question on a sock puppet.
"The picture is intended to show she likes guns" lol As they say, "wut"? Where did you see a "picture" of her 'liking guns'? It's a video. There was no gun. There were only media-backed marxist terrorists.
"The picture is intended to show she likes guns and maybe trying to scare people off.", "an image of her shooting at the range on her Twatter profile." Ohhhh, now I see; the TERRORIST mob failed to check the victim's twitter profile, noticing a photo from the range, and taking it as a warning to stop being TERRORISTS. How could this be?! How negligent of them!!! xD
(Ultimate eye-roll).