Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
You’re wrong. Note “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Notice how the children of diplomats born in the United States aren’t U.S. citizens. I’m an attorney. I’ve read the constitution, I’ve read the case law that partially enacted birth right citizenship. The case that created it was very poorly decided, misreading an older case to come to that conclusion.
If the amendment had intended to grant birthright citizenship, they wouldn’t have needed that “and”
The 14th amendment author explicitly wrote about how citizenship applies only to bloodlines, not soil, thus arguing against his language being used to justify birthright citizenship.
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.
—Honorably Senator and author of the 14th amendment, Jacob Howard (R-Michigan), 05/30/1866
meaning if you hop the border and drop a baby, both you and the baby are still
Subject to the jurisdiction of the country you came from, and therefore ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS.
I would support full citizenship being something that everyone has to earn, not something that's handed out just because of where you're born.
Time to go fight some bugs!
would you like to know more? 🤨
https://youtu.be/SMTz9nIUkGc
ITS AFRAID!!
Do you want to live forever?!?!
Earning the right to vote via military service didn't work out any better than birth right voting in the novel.
Birthright citizenship is absurd. The Supreme Court made it up
Try reading the Constitution. 14th Amendment:
You’re wrong. Note “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Notice how the children of diplomats born in the United States aren’t U.S. citizens. I’m an attorney. I’ve read the constitution, I’ve read the case law that partially enacted birth right citizenship. The case that created it was very poorly decided, misreading an older case to come to that conclusion. If the amendment had intended to grant birthright citizenship, they wouldn’t have needed that “and”
Why didn’t Trump end birthright citizenship? I heard Trump wanted to do that at one time,why did he stop?
The 14th amendment author explicitly wrote about how citizenship applies only to bloodlines, not soil, thus arguing against his language being used to justify birthright citizenship.
—Honorably Senator and author of the 14th amendment, Jacob Howard (R-Michigan), 05/30/1866
Sourced from Library of Congress records, quoting from the bottom half of the middle column: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=11
“...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...”
meaning if you hop the border and drop a baby, both you and the baby are still Subject to the jurisdiction of the country you came from, and therefore ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS.
https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/birthright-citizenship-fundamental-misunderstanding-the-14th-amendment Learn yourself something
Illegals don't "Reside".... They invade and hide in plain sight.
Mobile Infantry made me the man I am today.
Requirement should become planting an American flag on Mars