True. Buts it's about disenfranchisement. Mail in voting greatly increases ballot rejection. Last year there were at least 1 million mail in ballots rejected. If the rejected count is within the margin it's going to get extremely ugly. And I think that's the plan. They can't win legitimately. Washington state is 100% mail in voting (you can request a ballot in person if you lose yours and vote that day if you wish, but it's an office not a polling place.). They mail a ballot to every single registered voter, so it's not like absentee where you request a mail in ballot. We usually have 50% turnout or less. If states that don't do mail in votes are, and mass sending them out, and they get a 50% return they will claim the mail lost the other 50% with no proof. Even though it would follow the normal pattern of voter turnout. With mail in voting there is no knowing if it was lost in the mail, or people just didn't vote. In Washington we do have a way where you can check if your ballot was accepted or rejected. If it's a signature issue they notify you and you can fix it and have your vote counted if you get it done in a matter of days.

I believe a large number of ballots will be completed and mailed in by nefarious Dem-supporting groups, which otherwise would not have happened. For example: My mom is in a nursing home, along with about 100 other old people. My mom doesn't know what day it is, much less who is President, or that there is an election. I received a mail-in ballot addressed to her, at my address, because I am her guardian. I bet many others have family members that manage their affairs too. But let's say 50 out of 100 people there use the nursing home address. I can easily imagine the staff having an "Elect Biden for more gibs" party (they are all Dems), where they fill in an mail in the ballots.

That wouldn't have happened in prior elections. What makes it possible is mass unsolicited mail-in ballots, and lax State laws that will permit this kind of fuckery.