29
Comments (3)
sorted by:
2
CovfefeNegro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, and then there is the fact many insurance policies will not cover riot and acts of war/insurrection.

And deductibles, and all the accumulated losses from the time you will now spend rebuilding, the loans you will have to take, the depreciations you will have to absorb, the employees you cannot pay.

Rioters and BLM terrorists are never justified, period, and would not be within the realm of Human Society under any circumstances. They are always outcasts, Evil beings, not rational, not mentally viable, not legitimate Humans.

Their lack of mental capacity does not excuse them, their drugs and other self-inflicted derangements do not offer them shade or cover, they are despicable creatures, not much evolved from animals.

They are always a mortal threat, never allow them to approach within 30 feet of you.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5f4578a447986.jpg

2
PantsJihad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just as a note here, my Mom is an insurance agent. Back during the Ferguson riots, I asked her about whether the business owners would be covered.

Here's the sad answer: Under almost all policies, civil unrest is specifically excluded. Meaning unless you went out and got a rider or separate policy specifically covering for that risk, your insurance would not cover the damages.

1
Choppa_Pilot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we ought to turn this around on rioters who get shot.

"They have life/health insurance, so it's fine."