And also, his race is irrelevant....but the article made sure to point out he was white! Too bad they didn’t do the same for the shooter who killed Cannon Hinnant. Almost as if there is an agenda 🤫
Holy fucking 1984:
Going home is "fugitive from justice" and fleeing the state.
Calls rioters who tried to kill the shooter "protestors" with no mention of their actions
Shooter is "white" while the attackers' race, also white, is omitted, hoping readers will assume they are black.
Holding a rifle is called "brandishing".
On the ground being mobbed and attacked is called "in the middle of the street" "before firing off shots".
Completely omit anything that happened.
I couldn’t agree more.
And also, his race is irrelevant....but the article made sure to point out he was white! Too bad they didn’t do the same for the shooter who killed Cannon Hinnant. Almost as if there is an agenda 🤫
Holy fucking 1984: Going home is "fugitive from justice" and fleeing the state. Calls rioters who tried to kill the shooter "protestors" with no mention of their actions Shooter is "white" while the attackers' race, also white, is omitted, hoping readers will assume they are black. Holding a rifle is called "brandishing". On the ground being mobbed and attacked is called "in the middle of the street" "before firing off shots". Completely omit anything that happened.
Can we deport the writer to Africa?
We need new libel laws.
The race is very relevant. He doesn't have the right to self defense, he is white, that much is clear now.
Shooter was Hispanic.
I’m just now reading that.
Looks like the writer of the article will have egg on their face...oops.
But I’m sure, just like Zimmerman, they’ll still call the kid white.