The problem is that the prosecutor can use the fact that he voluntarily crossed state lines, with a firearm, to be present at the riot as evidence of premeditation and deliberation. I think its bullshit, but it will be sufficient to survive an outright dismissal.
If they do get him on anything, it will be dependent on why he was running from the head ventilated commie in the first place. If Kyle, in any way, provoked the attack, he's in serious trouble, though he will still be able to claim that he attempted to retreat before firing. The other 2, I think, are completely defensible as the chest ventilated commie had committed a felony against Kyle and was in the process of committing another felony. Lefty was brandishing a firearm at Kyle while Kyle was in a compromised position...making a fear for his life entirely credible.
Edit: Luckily Wisconsin does not have the death penalty so he does not have to fear that manner of punishment in deciding whether or not to fight the charges or plea down.
premeditation and deliberation cant apply to being as a general theme. They are very specific.
like you have to plot a murder.... crossing state lines to be present at a riot to protect a business that may very well see 0 action in no way shape or form comes even remotely close to premeditation and deliberation
1st degree murder literally requires you, as person, to think about and plot and follow through with the killing of specific people. Unless someone can find evidence that he went there specifically w/ the intent to shoot people regardless of any other facts there is 0 case.
way, provoked the attack, he's in serious trouble
no, you cant be in trouble for provoking communist animals to attack... thats on the communists, and you can act in self defense.
literally the only question right now is what happened in that very first shooting, as the video was far. I heard a gunshot before kyle had his weapon raised and they threw a molotov cocktail at him too. He also can be seen and heard calling 911 right afterwards. So its pretty apparent it was likely self defense in the first shooting. Then as he retreats to the police more commies attack him and he properly dispatches them.
In no sane free loving world does a DA charge you with murder under these facts.
nah
many self defense cases are never charged because its an abuse of public funds to charge cases you know have 0 chance lol
additionally prosecution discretion allows any DA to not charge a case that they know has evidence showing the defendant being innocent
also murder charges require a level of intent that is inherently lacking in all self defense cases (premeditation and deliberation)
The problem is that the prosecutor can use the fact that he voluntarily crossed state lines, with a firearm, to be present at the riot as evidence of premeditation and deliberation. I think its bullshit, but it will be sufficient to survive an outright dismissal.
If they do get him on anything, it will be dependent on why he was running from the head ventilated commie in the first place. If Kyle, in any way, provoked the attack, he's in serious trouble, though he will still be able to claim that he attempted to retreat before firing. The other 2, I think, are completely defensible as the chest ventilated commie had committed a felony against Kyle and was in the process of committing another felony. Lefty was brandishing a firearm at Kyle while Kyle was in a compromised position...making a fear for his life entirely credible.
Edit: Luckily Wisconsin does not have the death penalty so he does not have to fear that manner of punishment in deciding whether or not to fight the charges or plea down.
no not really
premeditation and deliberation cant apply to being as a general theme. They are very specific.
like you have to plot a murder.... crossing state lines to be present at a riot to protect a business that may very well see 0 action in no way shape or form comes even remotely close to premeditation and deliberation
1st degree murder literally requires you, as person, to think about and plot and follow through with the killing of specific people. Unless someone can find evidence that he went there specifically w/ the intent to shoot people regardless of any other facts there is 0 case.
no, you cant be in trouble for provoking communist animals to attack... thats on the communists, and you can act in self defense.
literally the only question right now is what happened in that very first shooting, as the video was far. I heard a gunshot before kyle had his weapon raised and they threw a molotov cocktail at him too. He also can be seen and heard calling 911 right afterwards. So its pretty apparent it was likely self defense in the first shooting. Then as he retreats to the police more commies attack him and he properly dispatches them.
In no sane free loving world does a DA charge you with murder under these facts.