Yes, that's what happened to Casey Anthony. They charged her with the higher crime that was impossible to prove with the evidence presented, but prosecutors went with it because it was such a high-profile case. Had they sought out manslaughter, they might have had it.
I mean the evidence was pretty obvious I still don't know how she got off. I think it was her where investigators only checked her internet explorer history and not fire fox too...
Murder requires witnesses, not simply forensic evidence, which they had plenty of. There was lots of testimony, which proved she lied about a lot of things, but they could not place Anthony at any crime scene involving her daughter.
Even the duct tape on her kid's face and related chemicals in the trunk of her car were not enough to physically link her to the charge of murder.
Yeah you are right. It isn't about what you know it is about what you can prove. She so clearly did it it is insane but it was all circumstantial. Her lies were so off the rails and didn't even work and she somehow beat it. She was stumbling through that shit like mr magoo and it worked out for her.
I mean you don't have to charge somebody with just the one specific crime for something like that, you can charge them with other things. They could have charged Casey Anthony with endangering a child, abuse, all sorts of other shit. If they only charge the one higher crime that's impossible to prove with the evidence available it's basically a signal that they want the acquittal.
Like in Chauvin's case. They only charged him with first degree murder which can't be proven just off of the coroner's report that states Floyd died of a heart attack that wasn't related to asphyxiation.
Probably the same thing here for Kyle. They could've charge him with unlawful possession of a firearm since he's 17 but all they threw at him was murder? Strange.
Yes, normally they stack the charges to shoot for a realistic conviction. Anthony was charged with three counts of perjury and did the time while she was at trial. That case was botched worse than the OJ trial.
If you want my personal opinion, I think these prosecutors are just too damned young and don't know what they're doing, especially coming out of law school the past 15 years.
Maybe the DA doesn't want the kid in prison but knows passions are high right now, and he can throw the book at kid now when media's lie machine is fully geared up and people will pay attention, but he can drop it a month from now when the the media's cycle on Kyle has spun down.
I absolutely agree with that. I remember growing up everybody who wanted to be a lawyer was exactly the kind of soyim I would never want representing me in any way, I'm sure at least some of those people ended up as prosecutors.
Marxist mindrot has infiltrated all levels of society
Yes, that's what happened to Casey Anthony. They charged her with the higher crime that was impossible to prove with the evidence presented, but prosecutors went with it because it was such a high-profile case. Had they sought out manslaughter, they might have had it.
I mean the evidence was pretty obvious I still don't know how she got off. I think it was her where investigators only checked her internet explorer history and not fire fox too...
Murder requires witnesses, not simply forensic evidence, which they had plenty of. There was lots of testimony, which proved she lied about a lot of things, but they could not place Anthony at any crime scene involving her daughter.
Even the duct tape on her kid's face and related chemicals in the trunk of her car were not enough to physically link her to the charge of murder.
Wait wat. This is the same case as the cop who said she went into the wrong apartment?
Yeah you are right. It isn't about what you know it is about what you can prove. She so clearly did it it is insane but it was all circumstantial. Her lies were so off the rails and didn't even work and she somehow beat it. She was stumbling through that shit like mr magoo and it worked out for her.
I mean you don't have to charge somebody with just the one specific crime for something like that, you can charge them with other things. They could have charged Casey Anthony with endangering a child, abuse, all sorts of other shit. If they only charge the one higher crime that's impossible to prove with the evidence available it's basically a signal that they want the acquittal.
Like in Chauvin's case. They only charged him with first degree murder which can't be proven just off of the coroner's report that states Floyd died of a heart attack that wasn't related to asphyxiation.
Probably the same thing here for Kyle. They could've charge him with unlawful possession of a firearm since he's 17 but all they threw at him was murder? Strange.
Yes, normally they stack the charges to shoot for a realistic conviction. Anthony was charged with three counts of perjury and did the time while she was at trial. That case was botched worse than the OJ trial.
If you want my personal opinion, I think these prosecutors are just too damned young and don't know what they're doing, especially coming out of law school the past 15 years.
Maybe the DA doesn't want the kid in prison but knows passions are high right now, and he can throw the book at kid now when media's lie machine is fully geared up and people will pay attention, but he can drop it a month from now when the the media's cycle on Kyle has spun down.
I absolutely agree with that. I remember growing up everybody who wanted to be a lawyer was exactly the kind of soyim I would never want representing me in any way, I'm sure at least some of those people ended up as prosecutors.
Marxist mindrot has infiltrated all levels of society