4093
Comments (119)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
meals23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean you don't have to charge somebody with just the one specific crime for something like that, you can charge them with other things. They could have charged Casey Anthony with endangering a child, abuse, all sorts of other shit. If they only charge the one higher crime that's impossible to prove with the evidence available it's basically a signal that they want the acquittal.

Like in Chauvin's case. They only charged him with first degree murder which can't be proven just off of the coroner's report that states Floyd died of a heart attack that wasn't related to asphyxiation.

Probably the same thing here for Kyle. They could've charge him with unlawful possession of a firearm since he's 17 but all they threw at him was murder? Strange.

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, normally they stack the charges to shoot for a realistic conviction. Anthony was charged with three counts of perjury and did the time while she was at trial. That case was botched worse than the OJ trial.

If you want my personal opinion, I think these prosecutors are just too damned young and don't know what they're doing, especially coming out of law school the past 15 years.

2
that1guy1981 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe the DA doesn't want the kid in prison but knows passions are high right now, and he can throw the book at kid now when media's lie machine is fully geared up and people will pay attention, but he can drop it a month from now when the the media's cycle on Kyle has spun down.

2
meals23 2 points ago +2 / -0

I absolutely agree with that. I remember growing up everybody who wanted to be a lawyer was exactly the kind of soyim I would never want representing me in any way, I'm sure at least some of those people ended up as prosecutors.

Marxist mindrot has infiltrated all levels of society