so Wisconsin castle-doctrine allows use of deadly force for fear of life at home OR a business.. I'm guessing a burning dumpster being pushed towards said business qualifies. my Q is does he have to be paid for service if it's not owned by him?
well context is a MAJOR factor here.. with an already called active RIOT in play someone breaking through any door or chasing after you isn't just looking for hugs
Castle doctrine doesn't apply here, although self-defense does. Because he fled the aggressors first and they chased, he can argue defense. This includes the first shooting, he was being chased and had something thrown at him then was chased again by the first clowns friends.
Wisconsin's judiciary is still mostly conservative-appointed, and unless they stack the jury I don't see how they can convince every juror he's guilty.
I have hunted this state for years. Stopped multiple time switch fire arms I'm under 18 even when we weren't hunting. It is not illegal to possess unless you are on school grounds.
Back to that.. does the 2A have an age restriction? I think not!
He'll get off in Wisconsin for self defense then serve life in Illinois for transporting the AR-15 in his vehicle or some shit like that. Illinois is severely cucked.
self defense is self defense does not matter whether the item used to defend yourself with is legal or illegal for you to have. that said they could charge him with some bullshit gun charge but that would still have no bearing on the shootings
so Wisconsin castle-doctrine allows use of deadly force for fear of life at home OR a business.. I'm guessing a burning dumpster being pushed towards said business qualifies. my Q is does he have to be paid for service if it's not owned by him?
so that means it is unlawful to hire personal security and either paid or unpaid have to give up their 2a and right to self-defense?
well context is a MAJOR factor here.. with an already called active RIOT in play someone breaking through any door or chasing after you isn't just looking for hugs
Castle doctrine doesn't apply here, although self-defense does. Because he fled the aggressors first and they chased, he can argue defense. This includes the first shooting, he was being chased and had something thrown at him then was chased again by the first clowns friends.
Wisconsin's judiciary is still mostly conservative-appointed, and unless they stack the jury I don't see how they can convince every juror he's guilty.
I wonder how militia and emergency declaration work in to the equation. Poor kid I hope he gets a fair shake.
Archive of the article, use this! https://archive.is/GUZ1K
(edit: it's working now, my phone probably did something stupid) I got an error message
I have hunted this state for years. Stopped multiple time switch fire arms I'm under 18 even when we weren't hunting. It is not illegal to possess unless you are on school grounds.
Back to that.. does the 2A have an age restriction? I think not!
how? He's under 18
Open carry age in WI is 18 according to https://www.usacarry.com/wisconsin-open-carry.html
Also according to official sources...
He's from super-cucked Illinois, though. How is the law even going to be applied in this situation? Is he subject to Wisconsin's laws, or Illinois's?
Wisconsin. You're subject to the laws in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed.
If any crime was committed in IL during all of this, he'll be charged in IL
He was already charged in IL on some exceedingly shaky grounds. After all, it's Illinois, home of Mayor Beetlejuice.
He was charged in Wisconsin arrested in Illinois for transfer.
Good to know, that one is not making the rounds.
He'll get off in Wisconsin for self defense then serve life in Illinois for transporting the AR-15 in his vehicle or some shit like that. Illinois is severely cucked.
That’s exactly what I’m worried about
Illinois you can have a foid card at any age. Even a new born. Conceal Carry 21.
So if he is a minor then what sort of penalties does EVERY SINGLE FAKE NEWS CHANNEL face for doxing him? Because all of these bastards did.
self defense is self defense does not matter whether the item used to defend yourself with is legal or illegal for you to have. that said they could charge him with some bullshit gun charge but that would still have no bearing on the shootings
And he'd be dead now, if he hadn't carried...
The felon with the glock was not legally allowed to have a firearm.
Any charges for him?
Not that I have seen, but I could be wrong
CNN: Hes white so he's guilty.