3979
Comments (263)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
34
AmpleDesserts 34 points ago +35 / -1

It's also starting to look like the house he was at and had robbed was his "ex-partner" he was arrested for raping.

13
Reddit_is_for_cucks 13 points ago +14 / -1

Are we sure that's who he raped? His rape victim was 15.

26
BurgerChef90 26 points ago +26 / -0

Politifact says “there’s no evidence he raped a minor.”

Oh he didn’t rape a kid? So he’s just a regular rapist then?

That makes it so much better /s

29
Reddit_is_for_cucks 29 points ago +33 / -4

Lol, guess politifact didn't see his warrant. That's how you know they're full of shit. His warrant specifically specifies that it it was a minor under the age of 16 but above the age of 14 that he raped. This is public record, fucking scumbag media.

15
BurgerChef90 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yup. Knew it was 100% horseshit from politifact and others as soon as I read it.

And millions will believe them instead of doing their own research. They could find the media lied about it in 5 minutes by doing a public records search. But nope, they believe the media 100% every time, and they call us ignorant.

15
GoldenComedy 15 points ago +15 / -0

He's just a regular rapist. Wisconsin law doesn't specify 3rd degree sexual assault as with minors. You can see in the link the law is 940.225(3)(a) which lines up with his rap sheet. The law in the pic is actually Rhode Island and you can see the numbering is different 11-37-6.

2
AmpleDesserts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there were two charges. Sexual assault on his baby momma and then sexual activity with an underage individual. Should have saved the docs