I think I finally understand the glaring weakness of the Left - they have no regard for context. They actually do form their reality around their immediate observations. White guy kills a black guy? Must be racism. BLMer killed by an AR-15? Must be white supremacist terror.
Just think of how much you could exploit your enemy if you knew they could only see one foot in front of them.
Be White.
Own gun.
Civilly confront rioters for breaking the law.
Get violently attacked by rioters.
Run away.
Shoot rioters if they chase you.
And they'll genuinely believe the whole time that you were the bad guy, while the law would vindicate you. Does a citizen not have the right to counter-protest, and then defend themselves when their unstable opponent attacks them like a wild animal? How can we even lose this struggle when we know our enemy so well?
Is the bar of provocation not so low at that point that a court wouldn't consider them to be "reasonable persons"?
Mentally insane.
I think I finally understand the glaring weakness of the Left - they have no regard for context. They actually do form their reality around their immediate observations. White guy kills a black guy? Must be racism. BLMer killed by an AR-15? Must be white supremacist terror.
Just think of how much you could exploit your enemy if you knew they could only see one foot in front of them.
And they'll genuinely believe the whole time that you were the bad guy, while the law would vindicate you. Does a citizen not have the right to counter-protest, and then defend themselves when their unstable opponent attacks them like a wild animal? How can we even lose this struggle when we know our enemy so well?
Is the bar of provocation not so low at that point that a court wouldn't consider them to be "reasonable persons"?