2213
Comments (254)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
41
14
Ih8leftists 14 points ago +17 / -3

That says he was 43 in 2013.

I don't think this is accurate.

9
CancelBLM 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lists his year of birth as 1993

5
sgt_richard 5 points ago +5 / -0

It also says 1969, it's probably a scraper that's all fucked up.

8
CancelBLM 8 points ago +8 / -0

If the database has a default value for a date/timestamp field and it gets a 0 then it will use the UNIX birthday - 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

11
Bossmus 11 points ago +14 / -3

First link inaccurate. 43 at time of arrest 7 years ago? No chance

65
rando_calrissian 65 points ago +65 / -0

When you leave a date field empty in programming, it evaluates to Jan 1, 1970. Which if used to calculate his age, would make him 43 in 2013.

So his DOB was left out of that page. That's all that means.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
7
WaxMyBallsBernie 7 points ago +7 / -0

Like SQL... I better get back to work but I can't put .win down!

11
H4yw1r3 11 points ago +11 / -0

This pede unix ticks

3
CancelBLM 3 points ago +3 / -0

The year is shown as 1993

5
rando_calrissian 5 points ago +5 / -0

They may have had the correct date of birth for him but the age calculation got fed a 0 instead of the actual date due to a programmer error. These things happen.

3
CancelBLM 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lists his year of birth as 1993

1
sgt_richard 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has two different DOB.