The user comments on that article from the mouth-breathing readers of the Times are already all about taking away people's rights.
As a veteran and a gun owner I say if this is how "good guys with guns" act then take away the right to bear arms. Like punishing a toddler who can't seem to learn right from wrong. "this is why we can't have nice things"
If this goes to trial there will be some HUGE victories for the 2A
Please let it be federal court because it involved the crossing of state lines!
My exact sentiments, pede
Get it to SCOTUS but only after Trump packs in a couple more judges next term.
It isn’t packing when you do it legally
He’s already charged. He will not be convicted though.
Yup and at the same time drop charges or fail conviction on the cop that shot Floyd.
Prepare for more riots!
I heard a lot of other shots on the videos but did not see where they came from.
I just assumed they were fireworks or something because no one was reacting to them.
I guess that as long as you miss, its "into the air" eh
should've chosen better air to stand in!
"gunman fires into the air, though it’s unclear why." Because they wanted to murder Kyle and he was too awesome
After the events of 2020, the gun grabbing BS is going to take a back seat for a while.
Maybe. Or maybe this will be used for the narrative “see, if NOONE has guns this wouldn’t happen”
The user comments on that article from the mouth-breathing readers of the Times are already all about taking away people's rights.
Whoever he is, he is not a veteran nor a gun owner.
That proves they WANT the government to be our parents
Archive: https://archive.is/aEt7A
I bet that comment section is on fire.
Ty! Fuck the NYT