Someone at the NY Times is gonna be fired. Can't be having people that research, investigate, and report without any political bias or bending of the truth. This is even on the ticker at the top of their site.
i thought the article was surprisingly fair and even-handed, at least for the NYT that is, though it totally glosses over an attempted head stomp then getting smashed over the head with a skateboard. He wasn't just firing because he was down on the pavement, he was firing because he was down on the pavement being assaulted by multiple shitbags.
Literally when in the last 7 years have the NYT published something that helps our side or Trump.
When was the last time you read an article in the NYT and said, "oh, that was good."
I can't see it yet, but I smell a rat.
EDIT: u/iamherefortheluls below pointed out something I missed. They completely neglected to mention that the 2 other victims attacked him. Just left that out.
They said they watched HOURS of video. Meaning they saw the skateboard guy, and the guy with the gun attack, themselves, with their own eyes, HUNDREDS of times.
And they just left it out of their article.
The universe is right again.
EDIT2: FURTHER SUSPICION:
Has anyone seen any video of why red shirt is chasing Kyle? All video I have seen picks up when he's already chasing, and not what started the chase.
Maybe they found the video of what started the chase, and they are waiting to reveal it because they think it will hurt Kyle's chances of success. That sounds like exactly what they would do.
Someone at the NY Times is gonna be fired. Can't be having people that research, investigate, and report without any political bias or bending of the truth. This is even on the ticker at the top of their site.
i thought the article was surprisingly fair and even-handed, at least for the NYT that is, though it totally glosses over an attempted head stomp then getting smashed over the head with a skateboard. He wasn't just firing because he was down on the pavement, he was firing because he was down on the pavement being assaulted by multiple shitbags.
Honestly reading that article I assume hell has frozen over. That analysis is far more fair to Kyle than I ever expected to see in the NYT.
my fear is, the forthcoming edit and any reference to this archive becomes mUh rW cOnSpiRacY.
Probably because they learned their lesson with minors.
.
You should pay very attention to that red flag you noticed.
I just wish I knew what it meant.
Something's amiss.
Literally when in the last 7 years have the NYT published something that helps our side or Trump.
When was the last time you read an article in the NYT and said, "oh, that was good."
I can't see it yet, but I smell a rat.
EDIT: u/iamherefortheluls below pointed out something I missed. They completely neglected to mention that the 2 other victims attacked him. Just left that out.
They said they watched HOURS of video. Meaning they saw the skateboard guy, and the guy with the gun attack, themselves, with their own eyes, HUNDREDS of times.
And they just left it out of their article.
The universe is right again.
EDIT2: FURTHER SUSPICION:
Has anyone seen any video of why red shirt is chasing Kyle? All video I have seen picks up when he's already chasing, and not what started the chase.
Maybe they found the video of what started the chase, and they are waiting to reveal it because they think it will hurt Kyle's chances of success. That sounds like exactly what they would do.
Has anyone seen the video why they started chase?
It seemed to start the chase right after a patriot put out Red Shirts dumpster fire. I’m not 100% on this because that video is hard to find
Well that's interesting. Why is that video hard to find.
The guy that was streaming at the time wasn't facing that direction when it happened.
Right? It is so weird to read actual journalism. Sure there are some mistakes and omissions but nothing that I can say seems calculated.
.
Doesn't that racist bitch Sarah Jeong have run of that place? Or am I mistaken?