It could have been. But there's video of plastic bag, with a coke bottle, and it's not on fire after kyle domes the guy. So you're not accurate. In situations like these you must always be accurate or people will find a single hole to ignore everything you say.
Something, in a plastic bag, was thrown at kyle. Around that same time, someone in the crowd fired a shot (that appears to be fired in the air as maybe a warning). The bag appears to have a coke bottle that's empty or with clear liquid. So potentially it's a molotolv, or the cola drained out but after it was thrown. Regardless it was thrown at Kyle in an attempt in incapacitate him. Saying it was a molotolv without 100% proof just ruins your credibility for the remained of the story bud.
Sorry bud, it could be either. In previous videos you see him pick up a bag, with what appears to be a come bottle but unclear. He looks like he throws a projectile at him that's possibly a molotolv cocktail, and later in these videos you can see a plastic bag with a coke bottle in it.
This is not proof of a molotolv cocktail. This is proof that something was thrown at Kyle with the intention to harm him. But stating 100% you know without any doubt, hurts your future arguments. When you go to people who think Kyle is a murderer you can't have any flaws from them to hide under.
In another video you can see it hit the ground and explode into what looks like flame. I'm sorry I don't have the time to find it for you while I'm at work. I never stated 100% it was a Molotov. It sure seems obvious to me from that video though. Maybe it could be a video anomaly or maybe your equipment just sucks and you can't see it.
Edit* I'm not the original person you were responding to and they deleted their post so I no longer care about this argument.
You think you saw that, and you may have. But that's not the argument to make. The dude who got deleted threw something at a child with the intent to cause bodily harm. It it was a teddy bear, a football, a stick, a running chain saw, a box.b, the object is irrelevant. Don't get hung up one something that we here on this .win are going back and forth over. Argue the action not the stupid object that was thrown.
It could have been. But there's video of plastic bag, with a coke bottle, and it's not on fire after kyle domes the guy. So you're not accurate. In situations like these you must always be accurate or people will find a single hole to ignore everything you say.
Something, in a plastic bag, was thrown at kyle. Around that same time, someone in the crowd fired a shot (that appears to be fired in the air as maybe a warning). The bag appears to have a coke bottle that's empty or with clear liquid. So potentially it's a molotolv, or the cola drained out but after it was thrown. Regardless it was thrown at Kyle in an attempt in incapacitate him. Saying it was a molotolv without 100% proof just ruins your credibility for the remained of the story bud.
https://twitter.com/dmplinstiltskin/status/1298975130777825280?s=20
Looks like you can see it in this video breakdown. Bud.
Sorry bud, it could be either. In previous videos you see him pick up a bag, with what appears to be a come bottle but unclear. He looks like he throws a projectile at him that's possibly a molotolv cocktail, and later in these videos you can see a plastic bag with a coke bottle in it.
This is not proof of a molotolv cocktail. This is proof that something was thrown at Kyle with the intention to harm him. But stating 100% you know without any doubt, hurts your future arguments. When you go to people who think Kyle is a murderer you can't have any flaws from them to hide under.
In another video you can see it hit the ground and explode into what looks like flame. I'm sorry I don't have the time to find it for you while I'm at work. I never stated 100% it was a Molotov. It sure seems obvious to me from that video though. Maybe it could be a video anomaly or maybe your equipment just sucks and you can't see it.
Edit* I'm not the original person you were responding to and they deleted their post so I no longer care about this argument.
You think you saw that, and you may have. But that's not the argument to make. The dude who got deleted threw something at a child with the intent to cause bodily harm. It it was a teddy bear, a football, a stick, a running chain saw, a box.b, the object is irrelevant. Don't get hung up one something that we here on this .win are going back and forth over. Argue the action not the stupid object that was thrown.
Maybe saying it that was explains it better?