6380
Comments (1116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
263
Doolimite 263 points ago +264 / -1

No Debates.... States arbitrarily sending ballots to vote by mail so there is no "winner" by the certification deadline.....We can't let this happen !

140
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 140 points ago +140 / -0

We can't let this happen !

Good news is that the electoral college votes on December 14, regardless of how many states actually have electors to send

46
Mr_Beanths 46 points ago +46 / -0

Ooooooo, this is good

93
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 93 points ago +94 / -1

It really is. The beauty of the system is that if a state can’t get its shit together, it simply doesn’t vote, and no other states are affected. How nobody seems to understand this and thinks that if they draw the chaos out to Jan 20 Pelosi magically becomes President is beyond me

51
MaxineWaters4Prez 51 points ago +51 / -0

Don't anticipate the democrats following rules and procedures.

16
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 16 points ago +16 / -0

Gas-lighting.

This is definitely their plan.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
iamherefortheluls 8 points ago +8 / -0

heard this theory that if a state doesn't have a valid election, current state government can just declare a vote for president as they see fit? I am not well versed on how states actually cast their votes...

5
Mr_Beanths 5 points ago +5 / -0

THANKS, PEDE! Keep fucking Spez’s wife.

26
Forgotmyoldpassword 26 points ago +26 / -0

They declare any rule not in their favor as racist or fascist. Just like the electoral college. They couldn't win so they pivoted to popular vote. This time around they can't even win the popular vote so they have to attack the entire voting system.

17
TrumpVictorious 17 points ago +17 / -0

As long as we get over 270.

Dems are going to full court press purple states with blue governors.

16
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 16 points ago +16 / -0

We don’t need 270. We need a majority of the votes cast. If California doesn’t send electors, only 483 are available, and 242 are needed to win

9
TrumpVictorious 9 points ago +10 / -1

Don’t put it past democrats to have electors submit votes for non-candidates or bullshit candidates to make sure nobody has a majority.

If a couple of purple states for example direct electors to Vote for the Green Party candidate as an upset move, then the total electors remains high but nobody gets a majority.

They consider spying and treason fair tactics, why not rigging the electoral college?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
papaMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

source?

11
lafingman0 11 points ago +11 / -0

vote early, vote in person!

9
Doolimite 9 points ago +10 / -1

I agree. Others here have said to wait until Election Day so the Dems don’t know ahead of time how much to cheat... but if you are in a big city, you should count on the fact that shit will be burning and mass violence and intimidation will be popping off around you so definitely vote early imo

2
featherwinglove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which they're trying to change to "Vote early, vote often" lol!

8
electricboogaloo 8 points ago +8 / -0

etet OQkmtM ISHn 1AY Ce3XsxyK DPt H wNR8 ZxBqfxP

7
zabbers 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even back then they knew city folk were weird, liable to rumor mongering and social pressure leading to mass hysteria. They don't see the world the same as rural folk. They aren't close to the means of production, and have an easier life where everything can be bought with enough money. They aren't busy toiling to live all day, so they constantly invent new problems and demand someone solve them. Idle hands. This has always been true.

26
Cesare_Borgia 26 points ago +28 / -2

They really do want a second civil war. I hope we're all prepared.

14
Block_Helen 14 points ago +14 / -0

Need more ammo. Sadly, hard to find.

15
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 15 points ago +15 / -0

I’ve got job applications and paternity tests as a backup plan, that should drive a few waves back.

4
I_Love_45-70_Gov 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ammoseek . com is a great site for ammo gettin'. If it's available, they will have a link to a vendor.

Unfortunately, at today's marked up prices....

4
Cesare_Borgia 4 points ago +4 / -0

The good news is many of us have been hoarding for a long time. I could probably outfit a company with battle load outs and my collection is tiny compared to some.

1
M1919A2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've got enough to outfit two platoons. Didn't even realize it until I took inventory for insurance.

3
ScreamingEagle1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not hard to find, ammoseek is your friend. The hard part is having the money to pay .75 a round for 5.56. Hell, .22lr is .16 right now.

1
M1919A2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Academy hasn't raised their prices other than what they've been forced to by manufacturers. i.e. .223 is $0.42 a round. Now you have to go two or three mornings a week to see what comes in on the truck. But in the last month I've picked up two 200 round packs of federal red box .223 for a carbine course. Last week it 124gr 9mm this week 115gr 9mm. They've had both brass .223 at $8 a box and Tula for $5 a box. Also picked up two 800 round bricks of .22 bulk for 5.5cpr.