6380
Comments (1116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
TrumpVictorious 9 points ago +10 / -1

Don’t put it past democrats to have electors submit votes for non-candidates or bullshit candidates to make sure nobody has a majority.

If a couple of purple states for example direct electors to Vote for the Green Party candidate as an upset move, then the total electors remains high but nobody gets a majority.

They consider spying and treason fair tactics, why not rigging the electoral college?

2
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they do that, the choice goes to whoever makes up the House on January 6 (ie, the candidates chosen in November). Each state gets one vote, so no advantage for CA and NY. I don’t think they’d like that outcome

1
TrumpVictorious 1 point ago +1 / -0

That assumes Nancy allows a quorum to be called.

If she doesn’t, she becomes acting President.

5
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 5 points ago +5 / -0

You’re assuming that she’s still Speaker in January. The 117th Congress (the entire House and 33 Senators) gets chosen in November and sworn in on January 3

That’s besides the point regardless. A quorum is called to count the Electoral College votes. No exceptions, unless the Dems are saying they want to stage a coup. If there’s no outright winner, the House has no choice but to immediately begin the process of choosing the President (eg, quorum is still active)

2
SpeedyPrius1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't the Supreme Court just put a kabosh on that?