11
Comments (104)
sorted by:
18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
16
dougkeenan 16 points ago +17 / -1

Aren't you supposed to be under a bridge somewhere?

-9
IEVisionExpansion [S] -9 points ago +4 / -13

I voted for Trump. I'm just saying I don't condone the misguided actions of a 17 year old, who traveled out of state with a loaded rifle knowing something was going to go down.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
bellcurvestrikesback 5 points ago +5 / -0

Out of state

He works in Kenosha, Antioch his home is twelve miles away.

Why did he travel to his city with a rifle? And how did you know it was loaded while he travelled with it?

1
Averon 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was loaned to him by someone in Wisconsin.

4
churnbutterhere 4 points ago +4 / -0

I regret that I have but one downvote to give.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
13
TreeOfLiberty 13 points ago +13 / -0

Should not have been there. Too young. Agreed.

Cops should have been doing their taxes-payed-for job. Governor should have stopped this crap all over the state back in June. Governor has the spine of a 1 month to retirement substitute teacher.

Not a vigilante. 100% self-defense. Under threat while retreating of great bodily harm or death: molotov, someone else shot in the air first, skateboard to the head, kick to the head, lunged at by someone with a pistol.

Not ambiguous at all. Self-defense. Incredible discipline in lowering his gun vs "Medic" who then lunged and got shot.

He did not open fire in a crowd, Gaslighter. No one who was not directly threatening his life was hit or fired upon. Get rekked.

-9
IEVisionExpansion [S] -9 points ago +2 / -11

I didn't see a moltov, though I heard that rumor. Usually Molotov's explode and fire ensues, which you cannot see in the video.

6
lanre 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did you hear all the handgun fire going off during this whole event? And did you see the guy who was shot in the arm holding his Glock? Are you just pretending or are you really this liberal?

4
TreeOfLiberty 4 points ago +5 / -1

Upper right panel is a LIT MOLOTOV being thrown at Kyle by Red Shirt Pedo.

https://www.revolver.news/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020.08.26-07.04-revolvernews-5f46b2452855d.png

2
bellcurvestrikesback 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not technically a molotov though possibly on fire

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

It wasn't a molotov, it was a bag with a brick or bottle in it

4
churnbutterhere 4 points ago +4 / -0

And it was on fire. You mysteriously omitted that fact.

2
bellcurvestrikesback 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because there are no char marks on the bag later in the footage, leading me to believe that what some thought were flames may have been lighting pixellation

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's yoir giveaway

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
4
bellcurvestrikesback 4 points ago +4 / -0

Things sure escalated quickly from our Burrito Chad

12
KetoOrourke 12 points ago +13 / -1

Low energy misinformation. Yawn.

12
maga_gal 12 points ago +12 / -0

Found a beta male.

12
nuhbin 12 points ago +12 / -0

he's not the hero we wanted, but he's the hero we deserve

because not one of us went out there and tried to stop any of this commie bullshit ourselves, so I celebrate anyone who has the balls to pick a side and fucking do something about it

if you're worried more about the legality of his presence or his being armed then go ahead and clutch your pearls

I don't care why he went there, or why the 5'3 pedo sex offender was chasing him in the first place

all I care about is a person's right to headshot anyone who tries to forcibly disarm him

this fucking kid tried to call 911 after he domed a dude, and he walked towards police with his hands up

I have no problem picking a side here

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well said

11
Sovren343 11 points ago +11 / -0
  1. Wisconsin law allows a minor to possess a rifle in the presence of an adult. He was part of a larger group that had adults but became separated from them for unknown reasons.
  2. Completely irrelevant as he was not breaking the law, but he did participate in a cadet training program.
  3. The circumstances are not ambiguous. Videos clearly show that he was pursued, assaulted and had a weapon pointed at him. He showed remarkable restraint and only shot those who posed an immediate threat.
  4. He might get introuble for crossing state lines here but he didn't exactly drive hundreds of miles to get to kenosha. Antioch is 21 miles from Kenosha. Your perception of how far this is depends on if you have lived in a rural or urban area. In my experience this is not far at all if you are used to living in a low population density area.
3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good points

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
crusadetiem 8 points ago +8 / -0

Underrated comment!

-8
IEVisionExpansion [S] -8 points ago +2 / -10

Nope.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
ripturntle 10 points ago +10 / -0

Scratch two commies, and an arm.

10
JustTheNews 10 points ago +11 / -1

Shut your punk ass up you commie

10
mimefortheblind 10 points ago +11 / -1

Im not saying you're wrong. But I am saying this case needs a vigorious defense.

How this plays out will determine how the rest 9f us can defend out families.

And the best possible outcome is a consensus that shooing looters thieves and rioters isn't a crime.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
uvontheterrible 10 points ago +10 / -0

When law enforcement can't or won't do their job then it's up to the citizens to protect their own interests.

-12
IEVisionExpansion [S] -12 points ago +1 / -13

So he traveled out of state and took interest in protecting a random Gas station? Ok.

9
SwampMonsterJesus 9 points ago +9 / -0

There have been reports he was there for his uncle's business.

5
bellcurvestrikesback 5 points ago +5 / -0

He literally says in one of the vids when blocked by cops from returning that "I work here"

9
Yournarritive 9 points ago +9 / -0

So your not allowed to protect yourself if attacked behind different state lines?

You are being petty with the state lines shit.

That doesn't make him deserve 1 degree murder either. Pick your battles better.

6
uvontheterrible 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's called people helping people. They still do that in some parts of the country.

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are we not allowed to care about what happens in the nearest big city to us if the cops stand down?

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
-10
IEVisionExpansion [S] -10 points ago +1 / -11

I voted for Trump. I objectively looked at the situation and the events surrounding it, as well as did some research on the shooter himself. How is that emotional?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
lanre 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even the NYT is more objective, lol.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

This time

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you aware he was under attack and retreating every time he had to use self defense?

10
Fringe--dweller 10 points ago +11 / -1

Shooter ? He was legally carrying his weapon. the age limit is on handguns not rifles. he defended himself against 3 attackers, at least one had an illegal pistol (the dead pedo one) but he is "the shooter" ?

your posting is twisted and biased, I call shill, a poor quality shill, at that

2
bellcurvestrikesback 2 points ago +2 / -0

Age limit is for open carry in general

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
SwampMonsterJesus 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's where you're wrong bucko. Read Wisconsin Statutes 948.60(3)(c) regarding open carry. He's in the right.

-11
IEVisionExpansion [S] -11 points ago +1 / -12

He's from Illinois buddy. Check the law.

11
SwampMonsterJesus 11 points ago +11 / -0

And he was carrying in Wisconsin a legal rifle. If they want to charge him, then Illinois should go after him.

-11
IEVisionExpansion [S] -11 points ago +1 / -12

That's why he's in Illinois jail. ;)

9
SwampMonsterJesus 9 points ago +9 / -0

And he'd have to be extradited to Wisonsin anyway. He's not being charged in Illinois, he's being charged in Wisconsin, but currently held in Illinois.

So shut your fucking cock holster if you're gonna be a retard.

-10
IEVisionExpansion [S] -10 points ago +1 / -11

Are you making up laws as you go along?

7
SwampMonsterJesus 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, but you are. Are you really this fucking dense to understand he's charged in Wisconsin but currently held in Illinois and Illinois has not charged him with anything?

6
lanre 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's an antifag, don't bother.

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

He is facing extradition hearings not charges in IL

10
BabaYaga 10 points ago +10 / -0

So you think that you have to follow the laws of your home-state while NOT in your home-state? That's so cute!

6
lanre 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look up FOPA. Nothing wrong with transporting firearms across state lines.

2
Averon 2 points ago +2 / -0

He borrowed it from someone in Wisconsin.

4
bellcurvestrikesback 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the case as he's underage. 2A should supercede state age limits imo. Alaska open carry min age is 16

8
BabaYaga 8 points ago +9 / -1

GTFO, Beta

-11
IEVisionExpansion [S] -11 points ago +1 / -12

Heh.

5
bellcurvestrikesback 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your response proves him right

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
8
pitzercody 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not bad bait....but your argument about Kyle not being trained to do the officers job negates everything else. If police should be taking care of this crap, then let them do it. When the mayors and gov's tell the cops not to engage and not to make arrests the citizens will defend themselves. And this shit about out of state....he works in Kenosha and was helping to defend his place of work. And I am sorry but within hours of the shooting there has been more eyes on the video than anything else, and what did we see, the alleged victims attacking with guns, skateboards and kicks to the head. Kyle shot 3 rounds, and 3 attackers went down. Take your glow elsewhere

-8
IEVisionExpansion [S] -8 points ago +1 / -9

So he worked at that gas station? That's news to me.

4
bellcurvestrikesback 4 points ago +4 / -0

He states it tonthe cops in the full video you did not bother to watch

8
SneakyPete 8 points ago +8 / -0

"He shot 3 people is self defense, but"

                      -George Soros 
8
WopNine17plus1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dead Commies are ALWAYS a good thing.

8
Old_ex_Commie 8 points ago +9 / -1

I hope you find a way to get the sand out of your vagina.

This kid is a hero, and you are a pussy. And so are the cops.

WE ARE IN A WAR. This fine young man risked his life and his future, to go out there and defend America from the Commies who burn, loot and destroy every night.

While you sit in your armchair and bitch. May there be a thousand more like him, stepping up to defend America. Because the cops sure as Hell aren't doing shit.

Fuck you with a rake.

-9
IEVisionExpansion [S] -9 points ago +1 / -10

I laugh at you Armchair warriors who literally think we are in a War, while you type away from your keyboard and shame others who aren't bringing their rifles to a protest.

3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is your definition of the start of a civil war?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
rcstl 7 points ago +8 / -1

Iffin you are just reposting shit from afar, you forgot to say so or to use the shitpost flair. If you are serious, go back from where you came from.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
2
Averon 2 points ago +2 / -0

But but but... They said they voted for Trump.

6
rcstl 6 points ago +6 / -0

You joined 47 minutes ago to get your teeth kicked out? $oro$ pays that well? smdh

6
HueyLongAdmirer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why? Wisconsin is, admittedly, a rednecky state that is VERY pro-Second Amendment. And Illinois outside of the Chicago are, is the same way.

Antioch may have a commuter train that goes to Chicago, but it's still a small town, on the border, and just because Illinois doesn't have as many lakefront cabins like Wisconsin doesn't mean it's much different.

You need to look up the growing number of rural counties passing Second Amendment Sanctuary resolutions Illinois already has a TON of them. Wisconsin has a few, but growing too.

These kinds of incidents only point to the need to use guns. And if you listen to the callers on www.wlip.com you'd know there are a lot of people scared, and feel the need to use weapons to protect themselves.

6
Jbsmoover 6 points ago +6 / -0

American finally defending himself from violent Communists, and "conservatives" are uncomfortable with it.

Until the streets are literally FILLED with more Kyle Rittenhouses, America will not be safe from revolutionary authoritarian fascists who want to kill you, rape your children, take everything of value, and burn the rest.

GTFO

6
Jbsmoover 6 points ago +6 / -0

All 3 "victims" were convicted criminals, and the medic was an official Communist organizer.

1
Averon 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why they can only pull this crap off in blue areas.

6
keepwinning 6 points ago +6 / -0

The governor refused non lethal assistance from the national guard. It is 3 months past time for Patriots to take A LEGAL STAND against tyrrany, anarchy, mob rule and lawlessness.

6
churnbutterhere 6 points ago +6 / -0

1.) Magnitude? WTF are you talking about? It was either a .223/5.56 or a .308 rifle. Magnitude is just your made-up characterization.

2.) One need not have any formal training to defend themselves.

3.) The first attacker threw a flaming object at Rittenhouse and then chased him down. Incidentally, it's unclear if Rittenhouse even shot that guy, as multiple rounds are going off from locations within the maximum range of firearms. There's even video of a firearm being discharged within 100 feet at the time the first guy goes down. Rittenhouse then literally stands at the first guy's body and pulls out his phone and begins dialing, as if to summon assistance. It's within the reasonable realm of possibility that Rittenhouse WAS RUNNING TO GET HELP because he saw the first guy get shot, then was falsely accused of being the shooter and chased and assaulted.

4.) Crossing from one state to another with a firearm is not prima facie evidence of intent to murder someone, especially if the shootings, at their present occasions, were defensive.

You're basically just going with what you think, without knowing any of the true context here, or considering the multiple very reasonable possibilities. Stay off of juries, you are toxic.

6
Qualitycounts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Want a helicopter ride commie ?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-10
IEVisionExpansion [S] -10 points ago +1 / -11

You're wrong. The only person shot in the head was the First attacker. Not a "Second shooter" - If by second shooter you mean, Medic guy who got his arm blown off, yes, he had a glock.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, he means someone was shooting at Kyle seconds before his first DGU

5
Winter_Is_Coming2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Kid was getting shot at when he shot the Bald Pedo Midget. I think you admitted he was justified with Skater Boy and The One Armed Bandit.

5
BonafideTarzan 5 points ago +6 / -1

While I understand your arguement, and agree he shouldn't be lifted too high. Sandman is my dude

  1. A 17 year old can join military and cross borders to protect.

  2. Do I need to be trained by military to protect my home? Or even to fire a weapon? 16 year olds helped win the revo war. People suggest even an 8 year old did too.

  3. You never mentioned the intent with the 3rd "victim."

I'm not denying that he was probably looking for a fight. He did not start off by unloading into a crowd Vegas style.

5
crusadetiem 5 points ago +5 / -0

1.) He is a Minor - Wasn't legally permitted to carry the firearm of such magnitude.

I’m told this is wrong outright but confess I have not cared to look it up myself.

2.) He isn't law enforcement, military, national guard. - It's questionable he lacked any of the proper training in any riot / crowd control tactices, and wasn't acting on any official duty.

Is that, uh, like, the rules of being.. something? I recall the second amendment not having so many words, but maybe you’re referring to something else?

3.) He shot three people probably in self defense, but one under ambiguous circumstances. Video quality of first shooting does not show any clear "attack" from the first victim, other than he was 'being chased' - Second attacker did have a skateboard and that could be justified as self-defense; however, skateboarder was trying to disarm him as he can be seen grabbing the butt of the rifle when he jumped over him.

Did that guy not look threatening to you? You must be a bad dude, like corn pop bad. Context notwithstanding- hell, I’ll even sort of agree with you in that I hope he had a reason to be there - if someone knows you have a battle rifle and they still come after you, that speaks to a willingness to engage in a lethal force encounter.

4.) He drove out of state to "participate" in that days events, crossing borders with a weapon, and also showing premeditated intent. He wasn't a business owner defending his property. Just a random Joe looking for test his Call-of-duty skills.

Possible? But we haven’t heard his side of the story. We haven’t heard any testimony under oath. We are left with hearsay - where anonymous sources can tweet that he yelled the dreaded double N-word while spraying lead - and video - where he appears to shoot three people while attempting to retreat each time.

Violence is always ugly. It doesn’t look like the end of an episode of Walker Texas Ranger. The bad guys don’t always give up and get walked away in cuffs. By the time you get to violence, every better option has been given up. We have, at least on the local scale, gotten to violence. Sorry it hurts your tummy.

5
lanre 5 points ago +5 / -0

1.) All gun restrictions are unconstitutional. Push for an amendment to the Constitution if you think it should be different instead of weakening the Constitution by "re-interprating" its plain English. 2.) Law enforcement, national guard, politicians all failed this town. They sat back and allowed the situation to escalate. If you want citizens to stand back and wait for law enforcement then law enforcement needs to do something besides stand by idly while cities burn and we're murdered for the color of our skin. 3.) Bicep boy had a Glock, other people in the area were shooting, and they threatened to kill him. 4.) Crossing a state border with a weapon is totally fine. Look up a law called FOPA.

4
nero2003 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you're right that he shouldn't have been there in the first place, but the latest video shows that a shot was fired before he opened fire on the first guy. He was defending himself. It's a bad situation all around. And I don't think 1st degree murder is anywhere in the ballpark of a legitimate charge.

-6
IEVisionExpansion [S] -6 points ago +1 / -7

I'd like to see proof of that, havn't found any.

2
bellcurvestrikesback 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you not watch the video? Even the NYT admits it.

4
bellcurvestrikesback 4 points ago +4 / -0

Video quality of first shooting does not show any clear "attack" from the first victim, other than he was 'being chased

Not true, rewatch. He was shot at and had bag with brick or bottles thrown at him while being bumrushed into a corner

1
WopNine17plus1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some guy did something.