8 posted 233 days ago by GnosticAwakening 233 days ago by GnosticAwakening +8 / -0 24 comments share 24 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (24) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – fthecoup 4 points 233 days ago +4 / -0 Unless all B is also A, then can't tell. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Morgoth 1 point 233 days ago +1 / -0 Yes permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – TheOutlawPepeWales 3 points 233 days ago +3 / -0 Not enough information. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – DivineLordTrump 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 All liberals are cucks. Some cucks are Pedo. How many liberals are pedo? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Schift_for_brains 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 None of A is necessarily C. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 0 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] 0 points 233 days ago +2 / -2 We have a real problem here brother permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 233 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 0 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] 0 points 233 days ago +2 / -2 This was a basic logic question and you're the only one who got it right permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 233 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 233 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ -2 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] -2 points 233 days ago +1 / -3 Answer is some permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Italians_Invented_2A 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 No it isn't. The text in the OP allows for some B to not correspond to A, thus the B in C can be entirely from the B portion that doesn't correspond to A. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -2 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] -2 points 233 days ago +1 / -3 A = B therefore B = A permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Italians_Invented_2A 3 points 233 days ago +3 / -0 No that's not what you wrote. You wrote "all A is B" and not "A is B". The first statement does not imply the symmetric property. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -2 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] -2 points 233 days ago +1 / -3 Yes it does all 10 = 10 all birds = birds all cups = cups permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Italians_Invented_2A 2 points 233 days ago +2 / -0 No, that's the very basic of syllogisms. Example: if all pedos vote Democrats, that does not mean that all Democrats are pedos. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -2 ▼ – GnosticAwakening [S] -2 points 233 days ago +1 / -3 If (a) all pedos vote Dem then (b) all pedos also vote Dem A = B permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Foxbat40 1 point 233 days ago +1 / -0 Some permalink save report block reply
Unless all B is also A, then can't tell.
Yes
Not enough information.
All liberals are cucks. Some cucks are Pedo. How many liberals are pedo?
None of A is necessarily C.
We have a real problem here brother
This was a basic logic question and you're the only one who got it right
Answer is some
No it isn't. The text in the OP allows for some B to not correspond to A, thus the B in C can be entirely from the B portion that doesn't correspond to A.
A = B therefore B = A
No that's not what you wrote.
You wrote "all A is B" and not "A is B". The first statement does not imply the symmetric property.
Yes it does
all 10 = 10 all birds = birds all cups = cups
No, that's the very basic of syllogisms.
Example: if all pedos vote Democrats, that does not mean that all Democrats are pedos.
If (a) all pedos vote Dem then (b) all pedos also vote Dem
A = B
Some