The number of exceptions to the hearsay rule are ridiculous. I suggest taking a look at the Federal Rules of evidence. 801-807 cover hearsay and the exceptions for it's use. I agree that it probably won't get mentioned in court - although for reasons other than it being hearsay - but there may well exist a valid exception for it that would allow it to be entered into evidence. Just wanted to correct that small misconception that hearsay always equals bad unusable evidence.
Also that arm around the shoulder and that look in the face so insincere he's pretending man. He's just taking one for the team or in this case his mate. Man I hope his social dept plan works out. If his friend cops out I don't think there are real bailiffs for that man.
Look alike, soul alike or one and the same? I'm lazy at this hour so I ask rather than answer. I'm confused though. I see two forces of reason and one fucked up in every which way including white supremacy and white inferiority.
Guy denies his own existence. I've stood my ground before against two dozen Africans without a machine gun or any gun and I can tell you I get bare respect blood.
This misanthrope has nothing on me. I just see the humans like a glock of stone. Got to sculpt it, removing his likes and that of other critical theorists to reveal the true and proper shape.
Yeah, no kidding. He should be turning his life around and teaching others not to screw around. I think he is feeling emboldened and wants to escalate, however. As soon as he heals up, he'll be on another crime spree
These people are not the brightest bulbs. Trophy pics in the hospital, and screenshots of text messages, repeating that Lefty wanted to kill The Kid. Dumb and Dumber.
I would certainly try to argue it under 803(1) or 803(5). I think 803(5) would be reasonable especially when calling that individual to testify. Whether the judge would agree will depend but I think a reasonable arguement may be made that this was a recorded recollection of an event that when called the witness may have conveniently not remembered.
Is it perjury if Lefty says he didn't say it. Then, call the friend and have him say what he heard Lefty say? IANL but there seems like some kind of leverage here on one or both of these commiefucks.
His mouth just fucked up. Involved in a shooting and says he intended to kill Kyle.
Any good lawyer considering leftys side just noped out of representing him.
They can sure as fuck call him up as a hostile witness- victim and the friend who said it/posted it. And you sure as fuck can introduce evidence of what someone told you. Are you fucking kidding me? You're not American, are you?
Dude, it's not hearsay when you call Bicep-boy's little soyfriend there up to the stand and ask him to repeat, under oath, what Bicep-boy said about the subject.
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. So when soyfriend is asked to repeat what bicep-boyfriend said previously out of court, that is hearsay. If bicep-boyfriend wants to repeat it in court, it’s no longer hearsay.
“For example, a court could bar Claire’s statement to a police officer that Bob had a gun and was acting like a maniac with either the hearsay rule or the Confrontation Clause.” the police can’t repeat what someone told them in a police report, but if the police had TWEETED what they were told by the witness, THEN SURELY it’s admissible. Jesus fucking Christ.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/hearsay-criminal-cases.html
Objection, hearsay.
Unless you’ve got a reason why you’re asking him about that other than because you’re trying to get in what Gaige said for the truth of what Gaige said, it’d be sustained. The prosecutor would object when you asked about the tweet. Before you brought that printout to the witness you’d need to show the prosecution and the judge, and the prosecutor would object and the judge would sustain. Hearsay isn’t no longer hearsay because it was said outside of court. That makes 0 sense. You didn’t discover a loophole. “Hey witness, quick tweet what you’re going to testify about so that none of the hearsay is hearsay!” No. The law isn’t a stupid computer that can’t anticipate a work around. The judge and prosecutors aren’t brain dead. You’re asking about what Gaige said. If you’re asking about what Soyboy said that Gaige said you better have a good reason for it, one that has nothing to do with whether or not what Gaige said was true, and one that’s more probative than prejudicial here (since that hearsay you’re trying to sneak in would be highly prejudicial).
How stupid do you have to be to think you can get around hearsay by changing the testimony from “he said X” to “I said he said X” when in both instances the X is the important part.
You really don’t understand what hearsay is, huh? What you said is exactly hearsay unless one-arm is a party opponent. You would need an exception to get that in. You’d have to call one-arm himself in, under oath, and ask him what he said. I’ll keep repeating this until you get it
No, that IS hearsay. But what you can do is bring up bicep boy and have him say what he said, and then bring in the friend and have him say what he said - not for the truth of the matter asserted, but to impeach the witness as a liar, and then let the jury do with that information what it wants
Words cannot express how much I wish buddy caught that bullet in his forehead instead of his arm
But if he did, he wouldn’t have been able to open his dumb mouth and prove his motive, means, and opportunity thereby exonerating our boy Kyle.
Thanks Lefty!
This useful idiot's right side isn't so useful any more.
all but their own side.
Well, that's hearsay, so no matter how true it is, it won't ever get mentioned in court. Unless homeboy is dumb enough to repeat it himself.
The number of exceptions to the hearsay rule are ridiculous. I suggest taking a look at the Federal Rules of evidence. 801-807 cover hearsay and the exceptions for it's use. I agree that it probably won't get mentioned in court - although for reasons other than it being hearsay - but there may well exist a valid exception for it that would allow it to be entered into evidence. Just wanted to correct that small misconception that hearsay always equals bad unusable evidence.
Thanks for the pointer, pede!
Ask and ye shall receive, eh? I guess we don't need to worry about what's admissible in court.
Actually, all we need are the pictures of the gun in his hand.
He did evil.
This scumbag regrets not being able to do more evil.
what are the visiting hours at that hospital?
Much more lenient than every other hospital in the nation still afraid of the Coof, apparently.
hope his good arm is handcuffed to the bed
Wait, I'm wasted but is that guy the guy Akkad's latest video was covering argument with?
Fuck man it's like his twinbro...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpabAwUk6Z4
Also that arm around the shoulder and that look in the face so insincere he's pretending man. He's just taking one for the team or in this case his mate. Man I hope his social dept plan works out. If his friend cops out I don't think there are real bailiffs for that man.
That's Vaush, a 'philosophical' white-supremacist commie fucktard.
Look alike, soul alike or one and the same? I'm lazy at this hour so I ask rather than answer. I'm confused though. I see two forces of reason and one fucked up in every which way including white supremacy and white inferiority.
Guy denies his own existence. I've stood my ground before against two dozen Africans without a machine gun or any gun and I can tell you I get bare respect blood.
This misanthrope has nothing on me. I just see the humans like a glock of stone. Got to sculpt it, removing his likes and that of other critical theorists to reveal the true and proper shape.
Allowed a visitor? Masks?
Seriously wtf. My gf had to say goodbye to her dying grandma on facetime just 2 weeks ago! This asshole gets a visitor! And why is he not arrested???
FINISH HIM!
He also admits he would empty the mag for fun, not just until he stopped the “threat”. That defiantly dose not look good.
screencap and send to Lin Wood
Whose Lin Wood?
Sandmanns lawyer, hes going to represent Rittenhouse
Lin Wood had made the callout for people to send archived URLs, not screenshots, if they find anything he could use for the case.
Kyle should have put one in his head as well
Would have been 100% justified. He should be thanking Kyle for not finishing the job.
Yeah, no kidding. He should be turning his life around and teaching others not to screw around. I think he is feeling emboldened and wants to escalate, however. As soon as he heals up, he'll be on another crime spree
Kyle had a choice: shoot commies or be killed himself. I think we all know the correct answer in that situation.
Kyle was good enough to spare that man's life. Sickening that this man believes he should have used that mercy against Kyle.
He aimed center of mass, but just missed. This jerkoff should have been shot through like the other guy.
These people are not the brightest bulbs. Trophy pics in the hospital, and screenshots of text messages, repeating that Lefty wanted to kill The Kid. Dumb and Dumber.
This is the guy who really deserved to get offed. Too bad Kyle didn't aim a little more to the right.
Umm, yah I can think of something that exactly DID stop your boy. Dumbass.
Balls of adamantium. Not sure if it's legal for president to promise a pardon though. Probably counts as incitement.
I laughed as I imagined an endless loop of self pardons
Shia LaBeouf and Neckbeard Guy aren't too smart.
So if I read this correctly, he was 3/3 shooting criminals with priors.
Kyle’s defense? Gaige needs to be prosecuted for attempted murder
lol Gay-jjjju. Who the fuck names their kid Gaige?
Parents who were thinking of Paige for a girl and were surprised he was a boy??? Best I've got for ya
They'll have a field day calling the friend as a witness with bug blowup of the tweet on a stand while he denies it, etc ...
There are other videos that show people chasing him (including red dead). The video then shows someone firing a round in the air.
I’m sure Kyle had no idea where the shot came from and was on offense as soon as he heard it. That’s when red dead rushed him.
If youre with BLM raise your right arm...
that should help the court case, the intent to murder is right there. If kyle didn't shoot he'd be dead.
Why did the doctors save his arm? He's just going to use it to burn down their hospital.
Screencap and archive, the send to Lin Wood as admissible evidence.
It’s hearsay. No respectable judge is going to allow that.
I would certainly try to argue it under 803(1) or 803(5). I think 803(5) would be reasonable especially when calling that individual to testify. Whether the judge would agree will depend but I think a reasonable arguement may be made that this was a recorded recollection of an event that when called the witness may have conveniently not remembered.
Is it perjury if Lefty says he didn't say it. Then, call the friend and have him say what he heard Lefty say? IANL but there seems like some kind of leverage here on one or both of these commiefucks.
Printed online is printed (like a diary).
If you took the time to type it, you likely mean it.
Sporting his zero inch python
Bitch found out
His mouth just fucked up. Involved in a shooting and says he intended to kill Kyle. Any good lawyer considering leftys side just noped out of representing him.
Retard can't help shooting his mouth off.. Even after he almost had his arm shot off..
Needs to be drawn and quartered.
Kyle needs to press charges against this guy. Now. Self defense means defending against an assailant and this is one he was defending against.
Yes! Lefty caught on
What. A. Fucking. DUMBASS!
What a shame hospitals had to treat him.
Fucking shame.
"can't stop my boy"???
I can think of 5.56 reasons you CAN!
BLM is a domestic terrorist organization.
too bad he didnt center mass that piece of shit.
I hope that shit hurt like hell. Hopefully he loses most motor function in that arm. Piece of shit.
Wears paramedic hat
Wants to kill someone
Tbf gaige never said it. His friend did.
Also, there's further proof for the lefties that keep saying he was only holding a cell phone.
Hearsay is inadmissible in court. So the defence won't be having a field day with it.
They can sure as fuck call him up as a hostile witness- victim and the friend who said it/posted it. And you sure as fuck can introduce evidence of what someone told you. Are you fucking kidding me? You're not American, are you?
5000 mafia henchmen are giggling at you right now. 5th ammendment, fren.
The 5th is only for self-incrimination. It doesn't allow you to 'not testify' on someone else's behalf.
Dude, it's not hearsay when you call Bicep-boy's little soyfriend there up to the stand and ask him to repeat, under oath, what Bicep-boy said about the subject.
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. So when soyfriend is asked to repeat what bicep-boyfriend said previously out of court, that is hearsay. If bicep-boyfriend wants to repeat it in court, it’s no longer hearsay.
Lawdog - "Mr Soyfriend, this is your tweet, is it not? One you composed yourself."
Soyfriend - "It is."
L - "In it, you claim Armless stated he regrets not killing the defendant. Is that correct?"
S - "Err... Yeah, I did."
L - "Now, remember you're under oath, Mr Soyfriend. When did Armless tell you of his regret?"
S - "Uh... when I visited him at the hospital?"
“For example, a court could bar Claire’s statement to a police officer that Bob had a gun and was acting like a maniac with either the hearsay rule or the Confrontation Clause.” the police can’t repeat what someone told them in a police report, but if the police had TWEETED what they were told by the witness, THEN SURELY it’s admissible. Jesus fucking Christ. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/hearsay-criminal-cases.html
Objection, hearsay. Unless you’ve got a reason why you’re asking him about that other than because you’re trying to get in what Gaige said for the truth of what Gaige said, it’d be sustained. The prosecutor would object when you asked about the tweet. Before you brought that printout to the witness you’d need to show the prosecution and the judge, and the prosecutor would object and the judge would sustain. Hearsay isn’t no longer hearsay because it was said outside of court. That makes 0 sense. You didn’t discover a loophole. “Hey witness, quick tweet what you’re going to testify about so that none of the hearsay is hearsay!” No. The law isn’t a stupid computer that can’t anticipate a work around. The judge and prosecutors aren’t brain dead. You’re asking about what Gaige said. If you’re asking about what Soyboy said that Gaige said you better have a good reason for it, one that has nothing to do with whether or not what Gaige said was true, and one that’s more probative than prejudicial here (since that hearsay you’re trying to sneak in would be highly prejudicial).
How stupid do you have to be to think you can get around hearsay by changing the testimony from “he said X” to “I said he said X” when in both instances the X is the important part.
You really don’t understand what hearsay is, huh? What you said is exactly hearsay unless one-arm is a party opponent. You would need an exception to get that in. You’d have to call one-arm himself in, under oath, and ask him what he said. I’ll keep repeating this until you get it
No, that IS hearsay. But what you can do is bring up bicep boy and have him say what he said, and then bring in the friend and have him say what he said - not for the truth of the matter asserted, but to impeach the witness as a liar, and then let the jury do with that information what it wants
There’s like 60 exceptions to a hearsay objection. A good lawyer will find one