2354
Comments (115)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
79
Oback_Barama 79 points ago +79 / -0

But if he did, he wouldn’t have been able to open his dumb mouth and prove his motive, means, and opportunity thereby exonerating our boy Kyle.

Thanks Lefty!

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
16
FuckChinaRaw 16 points ago +16 / -0

This useful idiot's right side isn't so useful any more.

5
Halcyoncritter 5 points ago +5 / -0

all but their own side.

6
rothbard_anarchist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, that's hearsay, so no matter how true it is, it won't ever get mentioned in court. Unless homeboy is dumb enough to repeat it himself.

5
SpaceMarine40K 5 points ago +5 / -0

The number of exceptions to the hearsay rule are ridiculous. I suggest taking a look at the Federal Rules of evidence. 801-807 cover hearsay and the exceptions for it's use. I agree that it probably won't get mentioned in court - although for reasons other than it being hearsay - but there may well exist a valid exception for it that would allow it to be entered into evidence. Just wanted to correct that small misconception that hearsay always equals bad unusable evidence.

1
rothbard_anarchist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the pointer, pede!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
rothbard_anarchist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask and ye shall receive, eh? I guess we don't need to worry about what's admissible in court.

4
MyDogCompletesMe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, all we need are the pictures of the gun in his hand.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0