I would certainly try to argue it under 803(1) or 803(5). I think 803(5) would be reasonable especially when calling that individual to testify. Whether the judge would agree will depend but I think a reasonable arguement may be made that this was a recorded recollection of an event that when called the witness may have conveniently not remembered.
Is it perjury if Lefty says he didn't say it. Then, call the friend and have him say what he heard Lefty say? IANL but there seems like some kind of leverage here on one or both of these commiefucks.
It’s hearsay. No respectable judge is going to allow that.
I would certainly try to argue it under 803(1) or 803(5). I think 803(5) would be reasonable especially when calling that individual to testify. Whether the judge would agree will depend but I think a reasonable arguement may be made that this was a recorded recollection of an event that when called the witness may have conveniently not remembered.
Is it perjury if Lefty says he didn't say it. Then, call the friend and have him say what he heard Lefty say? IANL but there seems like some kind of leverage here on one or both of these commiefucks.
Printed online is printed (like a diary).
If you took the time to type it, you likely mean it.