6287
Comments (309)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
YugiohVrains -2 points ago +2 / -4

Q literally contradicts Trump.

He said to trust Sessions, which was clearly false.

If there was more of an outrage on the right, Trump would have had an easier time firing him. Q is 100% a larp.

2
rooftoptendie 2 points ago +4 / -2

And you are 100% a divisive faggot. Drop your q-is-a-larp crusade. Its pathetic.

1
WhereForArt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wouldn’t it be nice if one of these shills gave us a challenge for once instead of screaming tired and exhausted talking points at us? I’d actually love to debate someone who’s actually read all of the drops and still thinks it’s all a larp. But no one who reads the drops in full still thinks it’s a larp by the time they are done so the challenge never arises :(

2
rooftoptendie 2 points ago +2 / -0

shill = "Youre a fucking shill"

they are so low energy this year they should be ashamed.

0
YugiohVrains 0 points ago +1 / -1

Q is either someone who wants attention (and got it) or a deep state psyop. You have promised yourselves things that won't come to pass in Trump's first term.

And they're going to try to steal his second term. Complacency is what brought us to this point. The promise of some useless special counsel resolving everything got us to this point.

Calling me a shill for wanting us to fight for our freedom is not just wrong, it's the opposite of what I'm saying. What would a shill even do to stop a supposed insider that knows all the dark secrets?

Q followers are a disgrace to Trump's base.

-3
YugiohVrains -3 points ago +1 / -4

Q divided us by leeching off the movement and pretending to be an insider.

We have a record of him contradicting Trump and providing false info. That's the division.

2
WhereForArt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Did sessions not kick off the investigations that led to the Durham investigations? You have to prove that justice can’t be served in one jurisdiction before you can compel a change of venue. Moves and counter moves.

Is sessions the only talking point they arm you guys with when sending you out to counter information operations?

-3
YugiohVrains -3 points ago +1 / -4

Are we going to cling to the promise of Durham until it's possibly too late?

Also, that's definitely not what Q suggested. He was hinting at a shit ton of indictment around the corner. He gave so many dates where nothing happened.

There is no difference between Q and astrology.

1
WhereForArt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where did Q give dates? That was skills making up dates to disappoint people who were following people taking about Q instead of Q him self. We have a term in the community for that “date fagging”

11.6 11.3 are abc=123 Marker for 11.6 is the first action against the coup plotters (11=k, 6=c). KC or Kevin Clinesmith

In cling to nothing. I keep researching and building fact patterns to trace down and identify victims and abusers to help prosecute the criminals.

You’re like a reference manual of shill talking points. Try reading the drops your self and making up your own mind instead of mindlessly repeating what others told you to believe.

-3
YugiohVrains -3 points ago +1 / -4

Ah yes, it was the shills making up dates. Brilliant. Because Q never says anything directly that we don't already know.

Everyone was already tracking the facts. Q leeched on to this movement, has no insider knowledge, and has contributed nothing but creating complacency in the most vulnerable of the movement.

Shilling against Q would imply he knows anything, and he doesn't. There's is nothing the left would even be worried about when it comes to Q, no shills needed. Q has created a fumbling mess of people LOOSELY associated with Trump, that would have otherwise been just Trump supporters.