2565
The only jersey i'd buy (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by g1bby7 ago by g1bby7 +2565 / -0
Comments (41)
sorted by:
33
South_Florida_Guy 33 points ago +33 / -0

The dude from SF Giants, Aubrey Huff.

18
g1bby7 [S] 18 points ago +18 / -0

Good call! He's based af

13
Wtf69000 13 points ago +13 / -0

I've loved Aubrey since he called Baltimore a Horseshit Town!

6
Kyani_Protocol 6 points ago +6 / -0

His podcast is great! His best line is “I’ll take my chances that real chicks dig some toxic masculinity”

3
Wtf69000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the heads up, I'll have to check it out. Thanks!

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
10
Jaqen 10 points ago +10 / -0

Buy an existing blank jersey, on the used market. You can iron on your own letters or have it embroidered.

5
Farage_massage 5 points ago +5 / -0

This.

All this shit is made in China anyway, so if you MUST buy this crap, just buy identical fake/knock offs from eBay that literally come out of the same factory.

15
Toughsky_Shitsky 15 points ago +16 / -1

Can't believe that George Floyd hasn't yet replaced Jerry West as the NBA logo.

2
Hangemh1gh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lolololololol! 😂😂😂😂

9
Konsaki 9 points ago +9 / -0

Giving money to China as a way of protesting Burn Loot Murder... Interesting strategy. Let's see how it plays out, Cotton.

8
imgunnasayit 8 points ago +8 / -0

I say #2 for the 2nd amendment or #17 for his age would be better....

5
Ninki333 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed. Immortalized at 17 so it makes sense.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
9
PraiseBeToScience 9 points ago +9 / -0

5.56

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
sneedwt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shouldn’t that number be 3?

4
RiffFantastic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe 17

2
ippwndu 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s like a less ambitious 10k.

4
theyrebothwrong 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't support these bastards at all. Fuck the NBA, fuck the NFL, fuck the MLB, fuck the NHL

2
TrumpOrTreason 2 points ago +2 / -0

I use to live on a street called “ Rittenhouse Drive”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Brotherhoodlum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spirit of '76. It's an homage to our founding fathers

1
Brotherhoodlum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spirit of '76!

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

No money to NBA

-8
EntilZha -8 points ago +2 / -10

Am I the only guy not 100% behind this kid?

I'm not mourning the thugs he shot....but...

He went there looking for trouble (with others) and had to defend himself because of a situation he went looking for and put himself in.

TRIGGER WARNING

I know a lot of people here have this militia fantasy and are living vicariously through him...it doesn't make him right.

9
rossagesausage 9 points ago +9 / -0

You have a context problem. He went there to protect his community. The "muh state lines" complaint is gaslighting nonsense. He lives 15 minutes away so that is 100% his community they were looting and setting aflame. If he went there looking for trouble, he would have shot when he got pepper-sprayed and he would have fired immediately instead of running away from all of his attackers. He conducted himself well beyond his years and deserves your respect.

7
PraiseBeToScience 7 points ago +7 / -0

Washington went looking for trouble when the Continental Army shot Redcoats too, so?

-6
EntilZha -6 points ago +1 / -7

Was he there protecting his or his families property ("his community", is not an acceptable answer)? I don't think so, ergo, he (they) went looking for trouble. IMHO it was as much a LARP as the antifa idiots, it just turned deadly.

9
GeneralVeers 9 points ago +9 / -0

"his community", is not an acceptable answer

Tough noogies. That WAS the answer.

When you ask a question, you need to be prepared for the possibility that you'll get an answer you don't like.

5
AllLivesMatter 5 points ago +5 / -0

FFS dude, the guy was trying to protect the community he worked in. Whether you completely agree with his motives for being there or not, he clearly was not looking to kill somebody. He did everything he could to avoid using his weapon.

This kid is facing 165 years and a mandatory life sentence. This is a crucifixion of the 2nd amendment plain and simple.

Edit: This isn't about if he should or shouldn't have been there, this isn't about if he was old enough to have the gun, this is about: Do you have the right to defend yourself when people are violently attacking you?

4
Geyck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah? I'm done beind on the defensive. If he was there to indiscriminately shoot BLMs I'd maybe be a LITTLE less supportive. (As I understand he was there to protect them and businesses.) He was there to help and was armed just in case shit got real. Well, shit got real and he defended himself, and a few commies died. It's a win.

0
ScreamingEagles 0 points ago +1 / -1

If the cops and state and local govt had done their damn jobs, none of this would be needed.

"Sorry guys, I can't defend myself, I'm not old enough." * shrugs, guess I'll die. *

You can't simultaneously REFUSE to arrest rioters and arrest one guy for breaking the law, and expect to be seen as a legitimate government.

If they go thru with punishing Kyle, then we have crossed the Delaware and its a bad day for the redcoats.

0
jive-ass-turkey 0 points ago +1 / -1

Am I the only guy not 100% behind this kid?

Yes