1748
In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times has done some actual, real investigative reporting and confirmed Revolver’s conclusion that the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting is an open-and-shut case of self-defense. Shockingly, the evidence turned up by the NYT actually strengthens the case! (www.revolver.news)
posted ago by DrBJTester ago by DrBJTester +1748 / -0
54 comments
54 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 2 ▼
– Archimedes 2 points ago +2 / -0

You should depending on your home state's laws.
I live in Pennsylvania and we have a "stand your ground" law.

I believe Wisconsin is still a "duty to retreat" state.

Kyle was trying to retreat in both incidents.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Paul_Revere 1 point ago +1 / -0

I live in Pennsylvania and we have a "stand your ground" law.

So do I. I know.

I believe Wisconsin is still a "duty to retreat" state.

I believe so, but I don't think I was making myself clear. My point is that, regardless of Wisconsin's idiotic laws, I don't recognize the concept of "you have a duty to retreat" when threatened. If it were a choice of being killed or worrying about an invented "'duty' to retreat," I'd choose to stay alive.

permalink parent save report block reply