1748
In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times has done some actual, real investigative reporting and confirmed Revolver’s conclusion that the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting is an open-and-shut case of self-defense. Shockingly, the evidence turned up by the NYT actually strengthens the case! (www.revolver.news)
posted ago by DrBJTester ago by DrBJTester +1748 / -0
54 comments
54 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 58 ▼
– DrBJTester [S] 58 points ago +58 / -0

"Only in a truly clownish world can a man who is being chased by an armed mob not fire a gun in self-defense after exhausting his duty to retreat."

This is going to be a red pill to rival Sandman and hopefully he will get more money from CNN and the leftist media for lying about him to the point he was charged with 1st degree murder. This 17 year old patriot stepped into the breach to stop a riot when the police didn't! The rioting mob tried to kill him repeatedly, they failed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Only in a truly clownish world can a man who is being chased by an armed mob not fire a gun in self-defense after exhausting his duty to retreat."

Fuck that shit. I don't recognize any "duty to retreat."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Archimedes 2 points ago +2 / -0

You should depending on your home state's laws.
I live in Pennsylvania and we have a "stand your ground" law.

I believe Wisconsin is still a "duty to retreat" state.

Kyle was trying to retreat in both incidents.

permalink parent save report block reply