5670
We’re good here, folks! (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by OhioRock3 ago by OhioRock3 +5670 / -0
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
22
CnnWillBlackmailYou 22 points ago +36 / -14

He was allowed to have a gun. He was not allowed to open carry until 18. Open carrying under the age of 18 is a misdemeanor in that state.

A felon carrying a pistol, chasing down a retreating person, and attempting to execute them on the street, well, there's a WHOLE lot of felonies there.

59
VoterIDMatters 59 points ago +59 / -0

Does not apply to long guns

He was legally in possession and legally carrying.

15
Au_contrarian 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is correct see WI Stat. 948.60(3)(c).

4
0095D 4 points ago +5 / -1

948.60(2)(a), however, says...

Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

I think everyone Kyle shot was in self-defense, but he might get slapped with this charge for being under 18. Class A misdemeanor in WI is not more than nine months in jail and/or a $10,000 fine.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
Au_contrarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

948.60(3)(c) reads (my annotations in [brackets]):

"(c) This section [meaning the entirety of section 948.60] applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 [relating to short-barrel guns] or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 [prohibition against persons under 16] and 29.593 [prohibition against hunting without a license]."

So literally 948.60 does not apply, including subsection 948.60(2)(a) that you quote.

3
Sick_n_tired 3 points ago +3 / -0

And you think our hero Kyle didn’t know he was within the boundaries of the law?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
TruuthSeeker 4 points ago +4 / -0

in Illinois it is legal to possess/own a firearm with parental consent if under 18.

I believe thats how it is stated

its probably registered to his mother..

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Believe it or not this has all already been researched and determined without your input

11
Awilen 11 points ago +12 / -1

He was not allowed to open carry until 18.

This is what I stumbled upon regarding the issue of his age https://thedonald.win/p/GvP7nwY4/x/c/15K6leOBRU

He may fall under the "Part of an armed or police force" exception, if he can establish he was part of the militia protecting property there (he was.)

13
throwawaytoday 13 points ago +13 / -0

I find no restriction for open carry by age. If you can legally possess the gun in Wisconsin, you can legally open carry it.

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/66/IV/0409/6

2
Awilen 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the law you linked means the law I referenced cannot be enforced, correct?

3
throwawaytoday 3 points ago +3 / -0

In Wisconsin, If someone is in violation of 948.60, they cannot open carry.

The law I referenced pertains to Wisconsin state law regarding local municipality ordinances. The law you referenced is part of state law, and not a local ordinance.

Edit: Basically, the state decides when, where, and who can carry a firearm, not local municipalities. For example, a township can't pass an ordinance against carrying a firearm (open or concealed) in restaurants.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Tacotonny23 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the revolutionary war, 12 and 14 year olds were handed rifles and told to go fight for freedom. I see no difference.

1
TruuthSeeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

well regulated, they were organized and militia he is goldin

1
CnnWillBlackmailYou 1 point ago +1 / -0

Literally said the same thing to my wife yesterday.