I try to dig man all that we can do its know our own laws and regulations, only way to change them, without the proper knowledge and facts people make dumb decisions. especially mobs.
On a side note our states gun laws are a straight up run around..chase the tail.. i know i spoke with some one earlier who laid out all the statues for me but i cant find it now.. the one that states that "minors can not possess a dangerous weapon" does not pertain to this because he is old enough, atleast that was my understanding. its more for 14 year olds alone..
however being in a "organized Militia" definitely gives him the legal right by our US Constitution. so its really moot at this point.
Militia membership is not required. Don't get hung up on "militia."
This is now settled law.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370
Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training. See Johnson 1619 (“Regulate”: “To adjust by rule or method”); Rawle 121–122; cf. Va. Declaration of Rights §13 (1776), in 7 Thorpe 3812, 3814 (referring to “a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms”).
Held:
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
The Militia is pretty explicitly defined as being made up of the Organized Militia (like the national guard) and the Unorganized Militia (all able bodied gun owners) both of which meet the criteria for "well regulated"
People are going to spend a lot of time debating why Kyle was even there in the first place. Personally, I think the reason he was there is irrelevant. A lot of people came together in Kenosha that day, and for a variety of reasons many of them had firearms. Kyle used his responsibly when the time came, and I think the situation ended about as well as it could have given the circumstances.
exactly, it doesnt matter why he was there. had just as much rights as the rioters to be there. That is just a nonsense argument for bad optics. The other thing is, I bet you half of the rioters were minors.. not a doubt in my mind. I know this state. I know Milwaukee. I know Chicago.
I cant find anything in statue 941.29 that would make it illegal for him to possess a firearm.
Thank you for being true to your username and helping people see through the smoke and mirrors.
I try to dig man all that we can do its know our own laws and regulations, only way to change them, without the proper knowledge and facts people make dumb decisions. especially mobs.
On a side note our states gun laws are a straight up run around..chase the tail.. i know i spoke with some one earlier who laid out all the statues for me but i cant find it now.. the one that states that "minors can not possess a dangerous weapon" does not pertain to this because he is old enough, atleast that was my understanding. its more for 14 year olds alone..
however being in a "organized Militia" definitely gives him the legal right by our US Constitution. so its really moot at this point.
Militia membership is not required. Don't get hung up on "militia."
This is now settled law.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370
Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training. See Johnson 1619 (“Regulate”: “To adjust by rule or method”); Rawle 121–122; cf. Va. Declaration of Rights §13 (1776), in 7 Thorpe 3812, 3814 (referring to “a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms”).
Held:
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53. (a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
Even if it was, he has that too.
The Militia is pretty explicitly defined as being made up of the Organized Militia (like the national guard) and the Unorganized Militia (all able bodied gun owners) both of which meet the criteria for "well regulated"
People are going to spend a lot of time debating why Kyle was even there in the first place. Personally, I think the reason he was there is irrelevant. A lot of people came together in Kenosha that day, and for a variety of reasons many of them had firearms. Kyle used his responsibly when the time came, and I think the situation ended about as well as it could have given the circumstances.
exactly, it doesnt matter why he was there. had just as much rights as the rioters to be there. That is just a nonsense argument for bad optics. The other thing is, I bet you half of the rioters were minors.. not a doubt in my mind. I know this state. I know Milwaukee. I know Chicago. I cant find anything in statue 941.29 that would make it illegal for him to possess a firearm.