5670
We’re good here, folks! (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by OhioRock3 ago by OhioRock3 +5670 / -0
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
Au_contrarian 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is correct see WI Stat. 948.60(3)(c).

4
0095D 4 points ago +5 / -1

948.60(2)(a), however, says...

Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

I think everyone Kyle shot was in self-defense, but he might get slapped with this charge for being under 18. Class A misdemeanor in WI is not more than nine months in jail and/or a $10,000 fine.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
0095D 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look, I get it. After seeing all the footage, I absolutely believe Kyle was in the right every time he pulled the trigger. I absolutely believe he had every right to protect his community at his age, since the police and NG weren't or couldn't. Unfortunately, a bunch of faggot politicians over the years have put laws in the books that allow a bunch of faggot district attorneys to prosecute people.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
dingocaloocan 2 points ago +2 / -0

we need to push voting in local elections just as much or more than federal ones. Imagine getting most counties sheriffs and mayors to not enforce state gun laws.

3
Au_contrarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

948.60(3)(c) reads (my annotations in [brackets]):

"(c) This section [meaning the entirety of section 948.60] applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 [relating to short-barrel guns] or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 [prohibition against persons under 16] and 29.593 [prohibition against hunting without a license]."

So literally 948.60 does not apply, including subsection 948.60(2)(a) that you quote.