I suggest you all open a tab with the video in it and watch later tonight. There’s some really great advice here for how to handle Police interactions.
I was falsely accused of something a long time ago and followed this advice, it saved my ass. I didn't do anything so obviously there was no evidence, but if I had opened my smouth I would've given them something they could misconstrue to hang me with. I saw firsthand how they're out to get people, not out to see justice done.
Glad to hear! Yeah it really boils down to 1 word in the Miranda rights --
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you have the right to stop answering at any time.
I don't know. I don't run a police force. I imagine getting rid of IQ caps, getting rid of affirmative action and actually waiting the most qualified, and not training officers to treat citizens as the enemy could be somewhat effective.
But I think it comes down to metrics and what they're judged on ultimately, yeah. If you promote based on convictions, you'll get more convictions, but not necessarily less crime, just people using every dirty trick in the book to convict someone as quickly as possible.
I was a victim of an armed robbery at a little ceasers. The cops asked if i would take a lie detector test to see if i was apart of it. I wasn't so i figured i had nothing to hide. The way my test was done was they ask you questions to purposefully lie and then ask you questions pertaining to the case. As an example "do you drive 5mph over the speed limit?" To which i would say "no" because everyone does, then they ask "did you have anything to do with such and such" to which i said "no".
Well my test came back and they said that my lies and truths didn't match which indicated i was guilty of being involved. To which i said "well all the answers you had me lie and tell the truth to resulted in no responces" to which the detective said "you're right. Would you be willing to take the test again but we will ask you the questions in a way that you answer yes?". Well i retook the test the way they described and the detective came back and said "Snip i guess you are just a yes kinda guy. You're free to go".
Here’s an oldie but goldie video:
Don’t Talk to the Police (47 min)
I suggest you all open a tab with the video in it and watch later tonight. There’s some really great advice here for how to handle Police interactions.
This is KEK101 lesson for any pede
I was falsely accused of something a long time ago and followed this advice, it saved my ass. I didn't do anything so obviously there was no evidence, but if I had opened my smouth I would've given them something they could misconstrue to hang me with. I saw firsthand how they're out to get people, not out to see justice done.
Glad to hear! Yeah it really boils down to 1 word in the Miranda rights --
I wish everyone would watch Richard Jewel and take their blinders off.
How do we remove this idea from policing. Decouple promotions with arrests?
I don't know. I don't run a police force. I imagine getting rid of IQ caps, getting rid of affirmative action and actually waiting the most qualified, and not training officers to treat citizens as the enemy could be somewhat effective.
But I think it comes down to metrics and what they're judged on ultimately, yeah. If you promote based on convictions, you'll get more convictions, but not necessarily less crime, just people using every dirty trick in the book to convict someone as quickly as possible.
Wait a sec... they don’t allow smart people to become a cop?
When i learned about the iq cap, i was floored and outraged.
I was a victim of an armed robbery at a little ceasers. The cops asked if i would take a lie detector test to see if i was apart of it. I wasn't so i figured i had nothing to hide. The way my test was done was they ask you questions to purposefully lie and then ask you questions pertaining to the case. As an example "do you drive 5mph over the speed limit?" To which i would say "no" because everyone does, then they ask "did you have anything to do with such and such" to which i said "no".
Well my test came back and they said that my lies and truths didn't match which indicated i was guilty of being involved. To which i said "well all the answers you had me lie and tell the truth to resulted in no responces" to which the detective said "you're right. Would you be willing to take the test again but we will ask you the questions in a way that you answer yes?". Well i retook the test the way they described and the detective came back and said "Snip i guess you are just a yes kinda guy. You're free to go".