Yes, a right to a speedy trial exists. But the innocent rot in jail while lawyers argue to judges that the Constitution does not define exactly what speedy is -- therefore, as long as things are handled promptly and in "normal" amounts of time, the "speedy" requirement is met. Been there.
Yes, a right to a speedy trial exists. But the innocent rot in jail while lawyers argue to judges that the Constitution does not define exactly what speedy is -- therefore, as long as things are handled promptly and in "normal" amounts of time, the "speedy" requirement is met. Been there.